英语六级真题及答案无听力Word格式文档下载.docx

1、3. 我认为例文 On the Importance of a NameThere is no denying the fact that it is a controversial topic whether names are important or not. Some hold the positive view. They claim that a good name, or a name that can be easily remembered, can bring one a lot more opportunities than others. Some Chinese ma

2、y also believe that a name designed according to the traditional theory of five elements can bring good luck. Others, however, hold the opposite view. They argue that a name is nothing but a code to distinguish one from another. A person “good” name may not be as successful as the name indicates. In

3、 the same way, a person who has a common or casually given name can also achieve tremendous success.Personally, I believe that both sides have something right, so we should not go to extremes. On the one hand, we have to admit that a well designed name can help a person to some extent. On the other

4、hand, we should not exaggerate the effect of a name on a persons fate. Anyway, a persons success mainly depends on his hard work and desirable personalities.Part II Reading Comprehension （Skimming and Scanning） （15 minutes） Helicopter Moms vs. Free-Range Kids Would you let your fourth-grader ride pu

5、blic transportation without an adult? Probably not. Still, when Lenore Sleazy, a columnist for the New York Sun, wrote about letting her son take the subway alone to get back to Long story short :my son got home from a department store on the Upper East Side, she didnt expect to get hit with a wave

6、of criticism from readers.“Long story short: My son got home, overjoyed with independence,” Sleazy wrote on April 4 in the New York Sun. “Long story longer: Half the people Ivet told this episode to now want to turn on in for child abuse. As if keeping kids under lock and key and cell phone and care

7、ful watch is the right way to rear kids. Its not. Its debilitating （使虚弱）for us and for them.”Online message boards were soon full of people both applauding and condemning Sleazys decision to let her son go it alone. She wound up defending herself on CNN （accompanied by her son） and on popular blogs

8、like the buffing ton post, where her follow-up piece was ironically headlined “More from Americas Worst Mom.”The episode has ignited another one of those debates that divides parents into vocal opposing camps. Are Modern parents needlessly overprotective, or is the world a more complicated and dange

9、rous place than it was when previous generations were allowed to wander about unsupervised? From the “shes an irresponsible mother” camp came: “Shame on you for being so careless about his safety,” in Comments on the buffing ton post. And there was this from a mother of four: “How would you have fel

10、t if he didt come home?” But Sleazy got a lot of support, too, with women and men writing in with stories about how they were allowed to take trips all by them selves at seven or eight. She also got heaps of praise for bucking the “helicopter parent” trend: “Good for this Mom,” one commenter wrote o

11、n the buffing ton post. “This is a much-needed reality check.”Last week, encouraged by all the attention, Sleazy started her own blogFree Range, kidspromoting the idea that modern children need some of the same independence that her generation had. In the good old days nine-year-old baby boomers rod

12、e their bikes to school, walked to the store, took busesand even subwaysall by themselves. Her blog, she says, is dedicated to sensible parenting. “At Free Range Kids, we believe in safe kids. We believe in car seats and safety belts. We do NOT believe that every time school-age children go outside,

13、 they need a security guard.”So why are some parents so nervous about letting their children out of their sight? Are cities and towns less safe and kids more vulnerable to crimes like child kidnap and sexual abuse than they were in previous generations?Not exactly. New York City, for instance, is sa

14、fer than its ever been; its ranked 36th in crime among all American cities. Nationwide, stringer kidnaps are extremely rare; theres a one-in-a-million chance a child will be taken by a stranger, according to the Justice Department. And 90 percent of sexual abuse cases are committed by someone the ch

15、ild knows. Mortality rates from all causes, including disease and accidents, for American children are lower now than they were 25 years ago. According to Child Trends, a nonprofit research group, between 1980 and 2003 death rates dropped by 44 percent for children aged 5 to 14 and 32 percent for te

16、ens aged 15 to 19.Then theres the whole question of whether modern parents are more watchful and nervous about safety than previous generations. Yes, some are. Part of the problem is that with wall to wall Internet and cable news, every missing child case gets so much airtime that its not surprising

17、 even normal parental anxiety can be amplified. And many middle-class parents have gotten used to managing their childrens time and shuttling them to various enriching activities, so the idea of letting them out on their own can seem like a risk. Back in 1972, when many of todays parents were kids,

18、87 percent of children who lived within a mile of school walked or biked every day. But today, the Centers for Disease Control report that only 13 percent of children bike, walk or otherwise t themselves to school.The extra supervision is both a city and a suburb phenomenon. Parents are worried abou

19、t crime, and they are worried about kids getting caught in traffic in a city thats not used to pedestrians. On the other hand, there are still plenty of kids whose parents give them a lot of independence, by choice or by necessity. The After School Alliance finds that more than 14 million kids aged

20、5 to 17 are responsible for taking care of themselves after school. Only 6.5 million kids participate in organized programs. “Many children who have working parents have to take the subway or bus to get to school. Many do this by themselves because they have no other way to get to the schools,” says

21、 Dr. Richard Gallagher, director of the Parenting Institute at the New York University Child Study Center.For those parents who wonder how and when they should start allowing their kids more freedom, theres no clear-cut answer. Child experts discourage a one-size-fits-all approach to parenting. What

22、s right for Sleazys nine-year-old could be inappropriate for another one. It all depends on developmental issue, maturity, and the psychological and emotional makeup of that child. Several factors must be taken into account, says Gallagher. “The ability to follow parent guidelines, the childs level

23、of comfort in handling such situations, and a childs general judgment should be weighed.”Gallagher agrees with Sleazy that many nine-year-olds are ready for independence like taking public transportation alone. “At certain times of the day, on certain routes, the subways are generally safe for these

24、 children, especially if they have grown up in the city and have been taught how to be safe, how to obtain help if they are concerned for their safety, and how to avoid unsafe situations by being watchful and on their toes.”But even with more traffic and fewer sidewalks, modern parents do have one a

25、dvantage their parents didt: the cell phone. Being able to check in with a child anytime goes a long way toward relieving parental anxiety and may help parents loosen their control a little sooner. Sleazy got a lot of criticism because she didnt give her kid her cell phone because she thought hed lo

26、se it and wanted him to learn to go it alone without depending on moma major principle of free-range parenting. But most parents are more than happy to use cell phones to keep track of their kids.And for those who like the idea of free-range kids but still struggle with their inner helicopter parent

27、, there may be a middle way. A new generation of GPS cell phones with tracking software make it easier than ever to follow a childs every movement via the Internetwithout seeming to interfere or hover. Of course, when they go to college, they might start objecting to being monitored as theyre on par

28、ole （假释）.1. When Lenore Sleazys son was allowed to take the subway alone, he _.AWas afraid that he might get lostBEnjoyed having the independenceCWas only too pleased to take the riskDThought he was an exceptional child2. Lenore Sleazy believes that keeping kids under careful watchAHinders their hea

29、lthy growthBadds too much to parents expensesCShows traditional parental cautionDBucks the latest parenting trend3. Sleazys decision to let her son take the Subway alone has net with_.AOpposition from her own familyBShare parenting experienceCFight against child abuseDprotect childrens rights4. Slea

30、zy started her own blog to _.APromote sensible parenting5. According to the author, New York City _.ARanks high in road accidentsBIs much safe than beforeCRanks low in child mortality ratesDIs less dangerous than small cities6. Parents today are more nervous about their kids safety than previous gen

31、erations because_.AThere are now fewer children in the familyBThe number of traffic accidents has been increasingCTheir fear is amplified by media exposure of crimeDCrime rates have been on the rise over the years7. According to child experts, how and when kids may be allowed more freedom depends on _.AThe traditions and customs of the communityBThe safety conditions of their neighborhoodCtheir parents psycholo