需求管理精讲.docx

1、需求管理精讲SiteVELIZYEVOLIUM SASOriginatorC. ChesneauMulti-Standard Controller Platform Project MX Project Quality PlanSystem:ALCATEL GSM BSSSub-system:SYSDocument Category:QualityABSTRACTThe MX Project Quality Plan describes the global quality objectives, criteria and quality assurance aspects to be app

2、lied in order to ensure a high quality level of the MX product as expected by our customers. This document applies for MX HW and SW applications porting on this new MX HW up to HW and SW Sub-DR4.Otherwise, Bx Quality Plans applies.ApprovalsNameApp.P. PelouasMX Technical Project LeaderL. SzaboEvolium

3、 Technical DirectorH. BuiEvolium Quality DirectorNameApp.D. BomyB9 Technical Project LeaderA. WazanaB8 Technical Project LeaderREVIEWEd. 01 Proposal 01Meeting review with S. Veret and P. Pelouas. Written remarks exchanged by mail, included in review reportEvolium/QD/04.008/CCHEd. 01 Proposal 02Evoli

4、um/QD/04.009/CCH Ed. 01 Proposal 04Evolium/QD/04.020/CCHEd. 01 Proposal 05Evolium/QD/04.021/CCHEd. 01 Proposal 06Evolium/QD/04.026/CCH which is an update and complement of Evolium/QD/04.021/CCHEd. 01 Proposal 07Evolium/QD/04.032/CCH which is an update and complement of Evolium/QD/04.026/CCHEd. 01 Pr

5、oposal 08Evolium/QD/04.035/CCHEd. 01 Proposal 09Evolium/QD/04.048/CCHEd. 02 Proposal 01Evoliuml/QD/04.049/CCHEd. 02 Proposal 02Evolium/QD/04.050/CCHHISTORYEd. 01 Proposal 01Proposal 01 built on the basis of BSS Quality Plan Release B9 ed1 proposal 07.Main adaptations concerns:- No sub-DR4+ as in B9,

6、 but a delta-DR2 on B9. Although it is seen as a B9 milestone, the quality criteria to be used are detailed in this MX Quality Plan.- More HW oriented, even if SW is developed as well. This SW development is mainly a porting to make SW run on the new MX HW generation and thus the initial PLC model u

7、sed will be the Evolium Equipment PLC adapted to the MX project case. At DR1, in particular, the checklist used will be the HW one (which check as well SW aspects as background of the HW).- Pre-SD done in MX project- No packages defined up-to-now- PROTOTYPE MX phase with SW B8 before usage of B9 SW.

8、- More precision on relations with external provider, since usage of - A lot of Commercial Off The Shelf Hardware and of- Some SW produced outside of Evolium. - More precisions on the handover towards SW validation teams from B9: MX will have its own DR4 but the validation test phase will be handled

9、 by B9 release team.- More precisions on the X-Free product constraints due to MX product to be delivered when it will become mandatory to have X-Free product in China and European Community.Ed. 01 Proposal 02Main modifications:- D. Bomy, Technical Project Leader for B9 added as approver.- Addition

10、of some precisions in DR4 criteria table in particular on expected QoS. It should not be lower than B9, in particular in term of Call drop rate and successful call setup rate.- Precisions in fig 2, that in fact from sub-DR4, the responsibility of the MX is fully transferred to B9 team with maintenan

11、ce and support insured by MX team. - The System Integration tests are expected to be run till SR2 and thus this is why no sub-DR4+ is planned.- The Delta-DR2 MX is done when sufficient level is assessed by MX teams and B9 VAL DPM and TPL.- There could be 2 Delta-DR2: one related to MX-MFS and one to

12、 MX-BSC.- There could be 2 SR1, 2 SR2, 2 SYS-DR4 and 2 GADR: one for MFS and one for BSC.- Pre-integration is replaced by wording system pre-integration in order to insist that we start to get a view on the system behavior even if done under the responsibility of the sub-system teams.- Precision tha

13、t MX DR1 must mention what are the costs for B9 due to System Integration and System Validation fully put under their responsibility. - Add Table 1 in 4.1 on general overview: to clarify which milestones are HW or SW and on B8 or on B9 - Modification of Evolium objectives for MX, but still to be con

14、firmed by Evolium Technical Director.Ed. 01 Proposal 03- Takes into account remarks received on ed1 proposal 02 before DR1 MX meeting planned on 7th April 2004.- Modifications to include impacts due to decision to fully support MX-MFS from B8 (up to full DR4) (in particular fig 2a and 2b).- Addition

15、 in quality targets of MX: - Improve the traceability, - To take into account as soon as possible the reliability issues: to check as soon as possible the assumptions done (to be treated during the TTF)- To complete SR1 review cycle with regular pre-SR1 meetings and then post-SR1 meetings till DR6 o

16、f the product: MX will be the pilot for this new process description coming from what is already on-going for GSM B8 and UTRAN R3: one main point to make it work = have DPMs trained and test package responsibles are responsible for initially well documented FRs (so that they can be exploited quite e

17、asily to build the final restriction list: correct severity, impact and workaround described with an operator view).- RoHS impacts (action to list boards impacted and in which extent they are impacted, action to list green products to replace components, plan to produce/test new boards (if needed).E

18、d. 01 Proposal 04- Simplification in order to present this Quality Plan as a “Sub-System” quality plan which then will be attached to one or another BSS Release Quality Plan once having achieved Sub-DR4.Ed.01 Proposal 05- To take into account the remarks from S. Veret before review by DPMs.Ed.01 Pro

19、posal 06- To close the open point on the global quality criteria objectives: alignment done towards what is done for other big HW platform project RNC V1 MKII (but for MX, we intend to count till SYS-DR4 + 12 months).- To take into account the remarks from MX TPL and DPMs, in particular:- Introducti

20、on of definition of regression tests and new features scope in 4.2.4 (sub-DR4 criteria). - Criteria on FR number for sub-DR4 precise: that it counts all FRs encountered during the MX campaign that it be already known by Bx teams or not. Ed. 01 Proposal 07- Based on last remarks (mainly editorial) se

21、nt on ed1p6. It will be the basis for review meeting to be held on 21-Sept04. In particular main discussions will be related to sub-DR4 criteria and regression tests definition. Ed. 01 Proposal 08- Modifications after review meeting held on 21-Sept04 with all DPMs and B8 and B9 TPLs: main decision w

22、as to have no criteria specific on regression nor on new feature raw quality at sub-DR4, but only a global criteria on raw quality (common to B8 and B9): RQ superior to 95%: this will be considered as the criteria for introduction of new equipment or platform on a Bx release.Ed. 01 Proposal 09- Mino

23、r modifications (see review report Evolium/QD/04.035/CCH)- B8 context not anymore said as specific to MX-MFS since there is now a studied request to introduce as well MX-BSC and not only to use a MX-BSC prototype for interworking tests.Ed. 01 ReleasedRelease of the document edition 01 based on MX De

24、velopment Plan edition 01.An edition 02 of this MX Quality Plan is targeted for mid-December 04 to simplify it and to be in line with the MX Development Plan edition 02.Ed. 02 Proposal 01Simplification of the edition 01 and alignment on MX Development Plan edition 02. Ed. 02 Proposal 02Take into acc

25、ount P. Pelouas remarks to go further in the simplification of the document.Ed. 02 Proposal 03New proposal after mail review sent to TPLs B8, B9, MX and MX DPMs.- Further editorial simplification.Ed.02 ReleasedReleased with agreement of P. Pelouas after re-reading of ed2p3.TABLE OF CONTENTS1 QUality

26、 plan presentation 101.1 Purpose and domain of application 101.2 Terminology 102 OVERALL QUALITY POLICY AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS for MX project 112.1 Global Evolium Quality Objectives application to MX Project 112.2 Specific management for RoHS 112.3 Audits and preventive actions within the project

27、122.4 Project Management targeted improvements for MX Project 122.5 Project Management System Support Activities 122.6 Deviations Management 123 EXTERnal PROJECT Interfaces 134 QUALITY RULES, ACTIONS and CRITERIA WITHIN LIFE CYCLE ACTIVITIES 144.1 General overview 144.1.1 Quality criteria for Sub-DR

28、4 164.1.2 Quality criteria for SYS-DR2 for MX on Bx 185 Appendix A: Abbreviations 196 Appendix B: Raw and Balanced Quality formulae 21INTERNAL REFERENCED DOCUMENTSNot applicableREFERENCED DOCUMENTS 1 Evolium Product Life Cycle8BL 14450 0001 ASZZA 2 Technical Life Cycle8BL 14152 0001 ASZZA 3 EVOLIUM

29、R&D Draft Organization Process 8BL 14150 0001 ASZZA 4 BSS Quality Plan Release B9 3BK 10242 0001 QMZZA 5 Evolium R&D Documentation Management Process8BL 14155 0001 ASZZA 6 Document review procedure8BL 14109 0000 ASZZA 7 EVOLIUM R&D Quality Manual8BL 14151 0001 QRZZA 8 EVOLIUM R&D MS Cataloguehttp:/a

30、ww-evolium.cit.alcatel.fr/evol_rd/Evoliumrdms/bodyerdproc.php3#top8BL 14150 0000 ADZZA 9 DR0 and DR0+ Checklist8BL 13350 0010 ASZZA 10 DR0/DR1 HW Checklist8BL 13350 0020 ASZZA 11 DR2 Checklist8BL 13350 0012 ASZZA 12 SR2 and DR4 Checklist 8BL 13350 0014 ASZZA 13 Pre-Starting Decision + Starting Decision Checklist8BL 13350 0006 ASZZA 14 Sub DR2 Checklist8BL 13350 0002 ASZZA 15 Sub DR4 Checklist(specific HW used if HW milestone)8BL 13350 0003 ASZZA (SW)8BL 13350 0005 ASZZA (HW) 16 Test Status Result Definition and Follow up8BL 14116 00