ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOCX , 页数:12 ,大小:20.99KB ,
资源ID:6303098      下载积分:3 金币
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.bingdoc.com/d-6303098.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(UTM与经纬度之间的转换Word格式.docx)为本站会员(b****4)主动上传,冰点文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知冰点文库(发送邮件至service@bingdoc.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

UTM与经纬度之间的转换Word格式.docx

1、 Unlike latitude and longitude, there is no physical frame of reference for UTM grids. Latitude is determined by the earths polar axis. Longitude is determined by the earths rotation. If you can see the stars and have a sextant and a good clock set to Greenwich time, you can find your latitude and l

2、ongitude. But there is no way to determine your UTM coordinates except by calculation.UTM grids, on the other hand, are created by laying a square grid on the earth. This means that different maps will have different grids depending on the datum used (model of the shape of the earth). I saw US milit

3、ary maps of Germany shift their UTM grids by about 300 meters when a more modern datum was used for the maps. Also, old World War II era maps of Europe apparently used a single grid for all of Europe and grids in some areas are wildly tilted with respect to latitude and longitude.The two basic refer

4、ences for converting UTM and geographic coordinates are U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395 and U. S. Army Technical Manual TM 5-241-8 (complete citations below). Each has advantages and disadvantages. For converting latitude and longitude to UTM, the Army publication is better. Its notat

5、ion is more consistent and the formulas more clearly laid out, making code easier to debug. In defense of the USGS, their notation is constrained by space, and the need to be consistent with cartographic literature and descriptions of several dozen other map projections in the book.For converting UT

6、M to latitude and longitude, however, the Army publication has formulas that involve latitude (the quantity to be found) and which require reverse interpolation from tables. Here the USGS publication is the only game in town.Some extremely tiny terms that will not seriously affect meter-scale accura

7、cy have been omitted.Converting Between Decimal Degrees, Degrees, Minutes and Seconds, and Radians(dd + mm/60 +ss/3600) to Decimal degrees (dd.ff)dd = whole degrees, mm = minutes, ss = secondsdd.ff = dd + mm/60 + ss/3600Example: 30 degrees 15 minutes 22 seconds = 30 + 15/60 + 22/3600 = 30.2561Decima

8、l degrees (dd.ff) to (dd + mm/60 +ss/3600)For the reverse conversion, we want to convert dd.ff to dd mm ss. Here ff = the fractional part of a decimal degree.mm = 60*ffss = 60*(fractional part of mm)Use only the whole number part of mm in the final result.30.2561 degrees = 30 degrees.2561*60 = 15.36

9、6 minutes.366 minutes = 22 seconds, so the final result is 30 degrees 15 minutes 22 secondsDecimal degrees (dd.ff) to RadiansRadians = (dd.ff)*pi/180Radians to Decimal degrees (dd.ff)(dd.ff) = Radians*180/piDegrees, Minutes and Seconds to DistanceA degree of longitude at the equator is 111.2 kilomet

10、ers. A minute is 1853 meters. A second is 30.9 meters. For other latitudes multiply by cos(lat). Distances for degrees, minutes and seconds in latitude are very similar and differ very slightly with latitude. (Before satellites, observing those differences was a principal method for determining the

11、exact shape of the earth.)Converting Latitude and Longitude to UTMOkay, take a deep breath. This will get very complicated, but the math, although tedious, is only algebra and trigonometry. It would sure be nice if someone wrote aspreadsheet to do this.P = point under considerationF = foot of perpen

12、dicular from P to the central meridian. The latitude of F is called thefootprint latitude.O = origin (on equator)OZ = central meridianLP = parallel of latitude of PZP = meridian of POL = k0S = meridional arc from equatorLF = ordinate of curvatureOF = N = grid northingFP = E = grid distance from cent

13、ral meridianGN = grid northC = convergence of meridians = angle between true and grid northAnother thing you need to know is the datum being used:DatumEquatorial Radius, meters (a)Polar Radius, meters (b)Flattening (a-b)/aUseNAD83/WGS846,378,1376,356,752.31421/298.257223563GlobalGRS 806,356,752.3141

14、1/298.257222101USWGS726,378,1356,356,750.51/298.26NASA, DODAustralian 19656,378,1606,356,774.71/298.25AustraliaKrasovsky 19406,378,2456,356,863.01/298.3Soviet UnionInternational (1924) -Hayford (1909)6,378,3886,356,911.91/297Global except as listedClake 18806,378,249.16,356,514.91/293.46France, Afri

15、caClarke 18666,378,206.46,356,583.81/294.98North AmericaAiry 18306,377,563.46,356,256.91/299.32Great BritainBessel 18416,377,397.26,356,079.01/299.15Central Europe, Chile, IndonesiaEverest 18306,377,276.36,356,075.41/300.80South AsiaDont interpret the chart to mean there is radical disagreement abou

16、t the shape of the earth. The earth isnt perfectly round, it isnt even a perfect ellipsoid, and slightly different shapes work better for some regions than for the earth as a whole. The top three are based on worldwide data and are truly global. Also, you are very unlikely to find UTM grids based on

17、 any of the earlier projections.The most modern datums (jars my Latinist sensibilities since the plural of datum in Latin is data, but that has a different meaning to us) are NAD83 and WGS84. These are based in turn on GRS80. Differences between the three systems derive mostly from redetermination o

18、f station locations rather than differences in the datum. Unless you are locating a first-order station to sub-millimeter accuracy (in which case you are way beyond the scope of this page) you can probably regard them as essentially identical.I have no information on the NAD83 and WGS84 datums, nor

19、can my spreadsheet calculate differences between those datums and WGS84.Formulas For Converting Latitude and Longitude to UTMThese formulas are slightly modified from Army (1973). They are accurate to within less than a meter within a given grid zone. The original formulas include a now obsolete ter

20、m that can be handled more simply - it merely converts radians to seconds of arc. That term is omitted here but discussed below.Symbolslat = latitude of point long = longitude of point long0 = central meridian of zone k0 = scale along long0 = 0.9996. Even though its a constant, we retain it as a sep

21、arate symbol to keep the numerical coefficients simpler, also to allow for systems that might use a different Mercator projection. e = SQRT(1-b2/a2) = .08 approximately. This is the eccentricity of the earths elliptical cross-section. e2 = (ea/b)2 = e2/(1-e2) = .007 approximately. The quantity e onl

22、y occurs in even powers so it need only be calculated as e2. n = (a-b)/(a+b) rho = a(1-e2)/(1-e2sin2(lat)3/2. This is the radius of curvature of the earth in the meridian plane. nu = a/(1-e2sin2(lat)1/2. This is the radius of curvature of the earth perpendicular to the meridian plane. It is also the

23、 distance from the point in question to the polar axis, measured perpendicular to the earths surface. p = (long-long0) in radians (This differs from the treatment in the Army reference) Calculate the Meridional ArcS is the meridional arc through the point in question (the distance along the earths s

24、urface from the equator). All angles are in radians.S = Alat - Bsin(2lat) + Csin(4lat) - Dsin(6lat) + Esin(8lat), where lat is in radians and A = a1 - n + (5/4)(n2 - n3) + (81/64)(n4 - n5) . B = (3 tan/2)1 - n + (7/8)(n2 - n3) + (55/64)(n4 - n5) . C = (15 tan2/16)1 - n + (3/4)(n2 - n3) . D = (35 tan

25、3/48)1 - n + (11/16)(n2 - n3) . E = (315 tan4/512)1 - n . The USGS gives this form, which may be more appealing to some. (They use M where the Army uses S)M = a(1 - e2/4 - 3e4/64 - 5e6/256 .)lat - (3e2/8 + 3e4/32 + 45e6/1024.)sin(2lat) + (15e4/256 + 45e6/1024 + .)sin(4lat) - (35e6/3072 + .) sin(6lat

26、) + .) where lat is in radians This is the hard part. Calculating the arc length of an ellipse involves functions called elliptic integrals, which dont reduce to neat closed formulas. So they have to be represented as series.All angles are in radians.y = northing = K1 + K2p2 + K3p4, whereK1 = Sk0, K

27、2 = k0 nu sin(lat)cos(lat)/2 = k0 nu sin(2 lat)/4 K3 = k0 nu sin(lat)cos3(lat)/24(5 - tan2(lat) + 9e2cos2(lat) + 4e4cos4(lat) x = easting = K4p + K5p3, whereK4 = k0 nu cos(lat) K5 = (k0 nu cos3(lat)/6)1 - tan2(lat) + e2cos2(lat) Easting x is relative to the central meridian. For conventional UTM eas

28、ting add 500,000 meters to x.What the Formulas MeanThe hard part, allowing for the oblateness of the Earth, is taken care of in calculating S (or M). So K1 is simply the arc length along the central meridian of the zone corrected by the scale factor. Remember, the scale is a hair less than 1 in the

29、middle of the zone, and a hair more on the outside.All the higher K terms involve nu, the local radius of curvature (roughly equal to the radius of the earth or roughly 6,400,000 m), trig functions, and powers of e2 ( = .007 ). So basically they are never much larger than nu. Actually the maximum va

30、lue of K2 is about nu/4 (1,600,000), K3 is about nu/24 (267,000) and K5 is about nu/6 (1,070,000). Expanding the expressions will show that the tangent terms dont affect anything.If we were just to stop with the K2 term in the northing, wed have a quadratic in p. In other words, wed approximate the parallel of latitude as a parabola. The r

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2