Analysis of high school language teaching of reading implementation of curriculum reform facing util文档格式.docx

1、 Cheng Hongbing, with grade teacher, said: “utilitarian hazards the narrowness of lead: chasing deer hunter can not see the mountains, fishing is invisible water; utilitarian and narrow the final analysis, is not sterile, it is not may be as large. “To this end, full of poetry and rational teaching

2、to activate students thinking, precipitated by the students of creative inspiration, students of the human spirit, to improve students language literacy, regression in this call for spiritual home society of great significance that I found in the day-to-day investigation and analysis of the implemen

3、tation of the curriculum of high school language teaching of reading faces serious utilitarian. A loss of humanistic spirit at the expense of short-term “benefit” Lack of language teachers are not teaching methods, techniques, nor the various theories, but the most basic language literacy and essent

4、ial human spirit, resulting in language teaching of reading, there are many utilitarian behavior. Some teachers over the pursuit of performance in class, classroom design more consideration is whether the teachers classroom teaching performance can attract the eye, ability to create something new, w

5、hether control of the situation, rather than from the students to learn the knowledge, capacity-building perspective, classroom design flow surface slick. otherwise some teachers also not out of the examination-oriented education, more attention to students scores to focus only on subject knowledge

6、to teach and students problem-solving skills training, the boring monotonous indoctrination and mechanical training devoid of students comprehensive ability. Extreme mode explore the weakening of the text content mining. Extreme exploration of language teaching has caused many illnesses, the key to

7、solve the problem points to the construction and improvement of the external conditions of the teaching of reading, trying to solve the problem through such efforts: the formation of the names of a variety of classroom teaching mode by constantly explore summed up the experience and trying to change

8、 the current language teaching “non-reading” （non-human）; interpretation of the teaching content through multimedia forms and a variety of teaching methods, with the intention to solve the tedious problem of teaching methods; comprehensive analysis focused on students understand the problem ability

9、of students to come out from a purely accept the morass of knowledge, and then subjected to the test of autonomy, cooperation and explore, and so on. efforts indeed to some extent changed the tradition with a single in the teaching of reading, and apparently is achieved or partially achieved the des

10、ired effect, as if to language teaching, especially the teaching of reading a glimmer of life and hope, however, through the good-looking appearance, we can see is some bad real: it is the pursuit of form over content, pursuit of a unified than personality, it is the pursuit of the “tricks” than art

11、 such duplicity let us once again the focus of attention on the language teaching of reading. Cooperative inquiry resulting in blind-oriented traction. Some of the teachers in the classroom simply pandering to the new curriculum standards, the pursuit of cooperation to explore this fashionable way t

12、o learn, but the purpose of the cooperative inquiry, the timing and the process has a lot of randomness. Surface looks very lively, not actually thinking impact spark students do not have the time do not want to think independently （which may have been accustomed to）, to discuss only general exchang

13、e, and is not carried out under the guidance of teachers, no one is willing to listen to different views of others, almost all students their hopes of teachers preaching. nominal cooperation to explore, easy to grow student arbitrary, learning to fish in troubled waters tendency to make the teaching

14、 of randomness and blindness. Emotional goals summary false show is suspected. I have such a lot of open class research found that teachers in order to highlight the three-dimensional target set in the classroom Summary will be emotional goals like knowledge objectives as listed here, giving a false

15、 feeling of the teaching of reading emotions, attitudes, values ​&with subjective experience, within the recessive It can not be stiff lecture, can not rely on a lesson to complete, but throughout the whole process of learning from the teaching mechanism , the Chinese reading teaching should b

16、e “wind sneaked into the night, silent” type, not for each class are far-fetched to add a link, only blend in with the knowledge and skills, process and methods, vitality. 4. Juggle “tricks” to harness the full language courses. School teachers juggling skills, language class basic learning skills,

17、they skillfully A papers, as in the machine next to expertly handle a batch of parts; skillfully written lyric article, felt not excite the slightest emotions waves. wonder some people lament: “Language education mutation as the possibility of a the pure skills training and craft tempered.” “This is

18、 the traditional Chinese language education in the modern transformation of Chinese Language Education the most profound, the most startling, the most terrifying nuclear change. “skills are absolutely essential, but we must not be the language mutation of a simple learning answer techniques and basi

19、c skills to steer the course. Language teaching, particularly the teaching of reading, Humanism, the reconstruction of the national spirit, the reconstruction of the national character are the best places. Language teaching of reading in the end should focus on language technology applications, or s

20、hould focus on the spiritual foundation of the lay people? Language education in the final analysis is actually the human spirit to cultivate “is” the rich experience of the human spirit, the life of the rich development of the human personality education “, is a” national culture enlightenment “no

21、language there is almost no human spirit （or only very simple, superficial spirit） there is no language, we can not use the “feeling” to experience the world. example, the only person to feel, to understand such as “flower splash tears, startling birds” （Du Fu, < Spring Hope >） obsession with

22、the pain of being separated; sea moon “Lam Tin day warm” （yin & Zither &） persistent feelings of regret; “an Acacia Xianchou , this situation no account can be eliminated only under the brow, but our hearts “（Qingzhao & Yi Jianmei &） lingering the Siv bitter, and so on. unite in feeling and knowledg

23、e” language “to give our or say, we learned the language, and understand or feel these it is clear that language education in the external performance of the education and training of language skills or training language skills is to train mental. In clear language education is the spirit of thinkin

24、g （not equal） education courses qualitative “At the same time, we want to seize the language skills to improve students language skills, thereby laying the foundation of the human spirit. Reposted elsewhere in the Research Papers Download http :/ / Second, too many “unified” restricted the teachers

25、and students to fully benefit The teaching of reading the inclusion criteria to the consistency of shows from the perspective of “In the general consistency of culture that todays order reasonable” thought control by the historical legacy of sorrow, language education and personality development of

26、students and therefore greatly reduced. We were too “uniform” （the needs of the college entrance examination） bound hands and feet, Chinese reading teaching almost does not allow the freedom of opinion of the majority of teachers and students to make independent text, such as & blessing the & critic

27、al tragic social environment and feudal ethics phenomenon, & & a thunderstorm, exposing old old family all the dark evil and tyranny of the landlords and the bourgeoisie, cold and hypocrisy, these unified interpretation makes the teaching of reading spiritual space is extremely narrow, lack of indiv

28、idual spirit a matter of opinion. teachings as well. teachings of a teacher successful in the region, so even wider imitated to follow, promotion, regardless of teacher personality, questions ideas and examinations mode is the same, so, students at the expense of in this age of the due Chin and fant

29、asy, they mature and prematurely aging prematurely wrapped the true freedom of self and personality. Forming mode of teaching, in turn, is largely restricted teachers and students, especially students to fully benefit, because the model of the formation, that is the method to explore the ultimate st

30、ereotypes in the mode of use of the process, ways of thinking and point to certain , known for the analysis and synthesis of information only formal deduction, because numerous drills to form a fixed mapping and routines, the method mode leads to the mindset, not only led the students to develop thinking inert, and bound students thinking space, affecting the development of the