大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx

上传人:b****1 文档编号:13240770 上传时间:2023-06-12 格式:DOCX 页数:14 大小:23.92KB
下载 相关 举报
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共14页
大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共14页
亲,该文档总共14页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx

《大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809.docx

大学思辨英语教程精读1Unit3教师用书0809

Unit3VerbalandNon-verbalCommunication

 

Unitoverview

BothUnits1and2mentionakeyword“communication”.AsThomasPaynepointsoutinTextBofUnit2,mostofus,linguistsornon-linguists,havethecommon-sensenotionthat“themainpurposeofhumanlanguageiscommunication”.Thustodevelopadeeperunderstandingofthenatureandfunctionoflanguage,weneedtotakeacloseathumancommunication.Thisunitexaminesthistopicfromacross-culturalperspective,illustratingthesimilaritiesanddifferencesinverbalandnon-verbalcommunicationbetweendifferentcultures,whichlaysafoundationforfurtherexplorationintotheinterfacebetweenlanguageandcultureinthefollowingunits.

 

TextA

Peopleindifferentcommunitiesdemonstratedifferentperceptionsandrulesofbothverbalandnon-verbalcommunication.Thewaytheyinteractisculturallyrelativeinalmosteveryaspect,includingwhentotalk,whattosay,pacingandpausing,listenership,intonationandprosody,formulaicity,indirectness,andcoherenceandcohesion.

 

TextB

Somenon-verbalbehaviorsarepracticallyuniversalandhavethesamemeaningwhereveryouare.,smilingandfacialexpressionsofanger,surprise,fear,sadness,andsoon).Butforculturalandhistoricalreasons,therehavealsodevelopedgreatdifferencesandvariationsinsuchaspectsaseyecontact,touch,gestures,andterritorialspace,etc.Withoutanawarenessofrespectandaccommodationforpeoplefromadifferentbackground,thesedifferencesarelikelytocausemisunderstandingsincross-culturalcommunication.

 

ThetwotextssupplementeachotherinthatTextAillustratescross-culturaldifferencesinbothverbalandnon-verbalcommunicationwhileTextBfocusesonnon-verbalbehaviorsandaddressesbothdifferencesandsimilarities.

 

Teachingobjectives

Thisunitisdesignedtohelpstudentsdeveloptheirreadingskills,communicativecompetence,criticalthinking,interculturalreflectionandabilitiesofautonomouslearninginthefollowingaspects.

 

Readingskills:

Usecontexttounderstandanewword

Identifycohesivedevices

Predictthecontentofanupcomingsentence/paragraph

 

Communicativecompetence:

Developacoherentandcohesiveoral/writtendiscourse

Usetopicsentences,supportingsentencesandconcludingsentencesinpresentations/essays

Communicateconstructivelyinteamwork

 

Criticalthinking:

Evaluatethestrengthsandweaknessesofpersonalexperienceasevidenceinargumentation

Organizetheargumentsusinganoutline

Noteandreflectonthedifferencesbetweenacademicwritingandeverydaywriting

 

Interculturalreflection

Identifysimilaritiesanddifferencesinnon-verbalcommunicationacrosscultures

Beawareofmultiplelevelsofdifferencesonwhichcross-culturalcommunicationcanfalter

Interpretcommunicationbehaviorsfromculturalandhistoricalperspectives

 

Teachingstrategies

Non-verbalcommunicationandcross-culturalcommunicationarebothinterestingtopicsinlinguistics.Theteachercanintroducethetwotextsbyquotinganecdotesorrelatingtostudents’ownexperiences(question5inPreparatorywork,p.59).Forstudentswholackexperienceofcross-culturalcommunication,thetopiccanbeledinbydiscussionsaboutinter-subculturalcommunication.

 

TextAisaresearcharticlefromanacademicjournalanditsstructureandwritingstylearequiteclear.Itisrecommendedtodrawstudents’attentiontotheauthor’slogic.,waysofarguing)anduseofevidenceinclass.Ifwell-planned,allthequestionsinPreparatoryWorkandCriticalreadingcanbedealtwithinsomedetailinclass.TheteachercanfollowallthequestionsinUnderstandingthetexttocheckstudents’comprehensionofthetext,whilethetasksinEvaluationandexplorationcanbedividedandassignedtogroups.Forexample,inMakinganoutline(p.62),theteachercandividethestudentsintothreegroups,eachresponsibleforonetopic.

 

Forclassicalworksininterculturalcommunication,pleasereferto:

Hall,EdwardT.(1955).TheAnthropologyofAmerican,192:

85-89.

Hall,EdwardT.(1959).TheSilentLanguage.NewYork:

Doubleday.

Formoreupdatedinformation,pleasefindthefollowingjournals:

Cross-CulturalCommunicationpublishedbyCanadianAcademyofOrientalandOccidentalCulture(CAOOC)

AcrossLanguagesandCulturespublishedbyAkadémiaiKiadó

LanguageandInterculturalCommunicationpublishedbyRoutledgeJournals,Taylor&FrancisLtd.

 

Preparatorywork

(1)Academicinterests:

genderandlanguage,interactionalsociolinguistics,conversationalinteraction,cross-culturalcommunication,framestheory,conversationalvs.literarydiscourse,andnewmediadiscourse.

(2)

Mainpublications:

YouJustDon'tUnderstand:

WomenandMeninConversation.NewYork:

Morrow,1990.

That'sNotWhatIMeant!

:

HowConversationalStyleMakesorBreaksRelationships.NY:

WilliamMorrow,1986.

GenderandDiscourse.NY&Oxford:

OxfordUniversityPress,1994.

Note:

OutsidetheacademicworldDeborahTannenisbestknownastheauthorof anumberofbooksontheNewYorkTimesbestsellerandshe isalsoafrequentguestontelevisionandradionewsandinformationshows.

 

(3)EdwardSapir(1884–1939):

an American anthropologistwhoiswidelyregardedasoneofthemostimportantfiguresintheearlydevelopmentofmodernlinguistics.Hismaininterestsareinthewaysinwhichlanguageandcultureinfluenceeachother,therelationbetweenlinguisticdifferences,anddifferencesinculturalworldviews.Hismostimportantcontributioniswhatisknownastheprincipleof linguisticrelativity orthe"Sapir-Whorf"hypothesis.

(4)

 

JohnJosephGumperz(1922–2013):

anAmericanlinguist.HisresearchinterestsincludethelanguagesofIndia,code-switching,andconversationalinteraction.Well-knownforhiscontributionininteractionalsociolinguisticsandthe"ethnographyofcommunication",Gumperz’sresearchhasbenefittedsuchfieldsassociolinguistics,discourseanalysis,andlinguisticanthropology.

 

E.M.Forster(1879–1970):

anEnglishnovelist,shortstorywriter,essayistandlibrettist.Heisknownbestforhisironicandwell-plottednovelsexaminingclassdifferenceandhypocrisyinearly20th-centuryBritishsociety.HewasnominatedfortheNobelPrizeinLiteraturein13differentyears.

 

RobertKaplan:

AnAmerican appliedlinguist.Hisresearchareacoversappliedlinguistics,discourseanalysis,languagepolicy,languageplanning,andESL/EFLTeaching.HeismostfamousforhiscontributioninContrastiveRhetoric,atermhefirstcoinedin1966.Kaplanhasauthoredoredited32books,morethan130articlesinscholarlyjournalsandchaptersinbooks,andmorethan85bookreviewsandotherephemeralpiecesinvariousnewsletters,aswellas9specialreportstothe.governmentandtogovernmentselsewhere.

(5)isthesystematicstudyofmeaningdependentonlanguageinuse.Unlikesemantics,whichexaminesconventionalmeaning"coded"inagivenlanguage,pragmaticsstudieshowthetransmissionofmeaningdependsnotonlyonstructuralandlinguisticknowledge.,grammar,lexicon,etc.)ofthespeakerandthehearer,butalsoonthecontextoftheutterance,anypre-existingknowledgeaboutthoseparticipantsinvolved,theinferredintentofthespeaker,andotherfactors.Centraltopicsofpragmaticsincludeaspeaker’scommunicativeintentions,theuseoflanguagethatrequiressuchintentions,contextofuse,therelationbetweentheuserofalinguisticformandtheactofusingtheform,andthestrategiesanaddresseeemploystoworkoutwhattheintentionsandactsare.

(6)

 

(7)Cohesionreferstotheuseofvariousphonological,grammatical,and/orlexicalmeanstolinksentencesorutterancesintoawell-connected,largerlinguisticunitsuchasaparagraphorachapter.Inotherwords,cohesionachieveswell-connectednessbymeansoflinguisticforms.

(8)

Example:

Maryisasecretary.Sheworksinalawfirm.Yan(2012)

 

Coherencereferstothelogicalwell-connectednessbetweendifferentpartsofapieceofspokenorwrittenlanguage,whichdistinguishesitfromarandomassemblageofsentencesorutterances.Yan(2012)

 

Formly incohesive discourse may be coherent through common sense, cultural background, contextual information, imagination, logical assumption, etc. 

Husband:

 That’s the telephone. 

Wife:

 I’m in the bath. 

Husband:

 OK. 

 

(9)Pauseisatemporaryandbriefbreakintheflowofspeech,whichisoftenclassifiedintofilledpauseandunfilledorsilentpause.Theformeristakenuporfilledbyahesitationformlikeah,er,andum.Incontrast,thelatterisnotfilledbyahesitationform.Inotherwords,asilentpauseisonewherethereisnovocalization.

(10)

 

Criticalreading

I.Understandingthetext

(1)Themainpurposeofthisarticleistoillustrateeightlevelsofcross-culturaldifferencesinnon-verbalaspectsofcommunication.

 

(2)Wecanunderstandthenatureoflanguagebyobservingitincommunicationandincontactwithothersystemsofcommunication.

 

(3)Pacingandpausing,listenership.Indecidingwhentotalkandwhattosay,thespeakerusuallytakesaconsciousspeechplanning,yetinpacingandpausingandinshowinglistenershipinaconversation,onedoesnotneedtostopandthinkforadecision.

 

(4)Sectionstartswithadirectthesisstatement.Thentheauthorexplainsitwithanexpert’s(Scollon)researchfindingsandsectiontheauthorraisesanumberofquestions(inpara7,9and11)andrespondstothemwithrelevantresearchfindings(Goody’saswellashers)andherownpersonalexperience.Sectionisalsoorganizedintheorderof“question-answer”.Sectionillustratescross-culturaldiffere

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 自然科学 > 物理

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2