股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:16678959 上传时间:2023-07-16 格式:DOCX 页数:23 大小:512.93KB
下载 相关 举报
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第17页
第17页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第18页
第18页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第19页
第19页 / 共23页
股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx_第20页
第20页 / 共23页
亲,该文档总共23页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx

《股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx(23页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能.docx

股票收盘价格的确定和股票指数期货套期保值性能

Determinationofstockclosingpricesandhedgingperformancewithstockindicesfutures

Keywords:

∙Stockclosingprices;

∙Futuresclosingprices;

∙Marketefficiency;

∙Hedgingeffectiveness

∙G14;

∙G15;

∙G18

Abstract

Thispaperexaminestheimpactofthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesonfuturespriceefficiencyandhedgingeffectivenesswithstockindicesfutures.Theempiricalresultsindicatethattheincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallimprovespriceefficiencyinthefuturesclosingpricesandthenenhanceshedgingperformanceintermsofthehedgingrisks.Additionally,fromautility-maximizationpointofview,hedgingperformancedoesnotimproveaftertheintroductionofthe5minstockclosingcall,whichcanbeexplainedbyanimprovementinpriceefficiencyatthefuturesmarketclose.

1.Introduction

Thispaperexaminestheimpactofthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesonfuturespriceefficiencyandhedgingeffectivenesswithstockindicesfutures.Hedgingeffectivenesshasbeenmarkedlyinformedbyfuturesliterature(seeYangandAllen,2004;Fernandez,2008;Hsuetal.,2008).Incontrast,anumberofrecentstudieshaveexaminedtheeffectsofthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesonmarketefficiency(seePaganoandSchwartz,2003;Aitkenetal.,2005;HuangandTsai,2008).PaganoandSchwartz(2003)indicatethatachangeinthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesmightaffectthederivativesmarkets.Inpractice,therelationshipbetweenstockandfuturesclosingpricesisunlikelytochangeovertimebecauseofarbitrageforces(Tong,1996).Hence,ifthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesaffectsmarketefficiencyinstockclosingprices,itmightthenhaveanimpactonfuturespriceefficiencyandhedgingperformance.However,nostudieshavebeenperformedtoinvestigatethisimpact.

On1July2002,theTaiwanStockExchange(TSE)expandedthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallfrom30secto5mininanattempttoenhancethefairnessofstockclosingprices.Additionally,theTaiwanFuturesExchange(TAIFEX)closes15minlaterthantheTSE.Hence,thisinstitutionalchangeprovidesanopportunitytostudytheeffectonfuturesclosingpriceefficiencyandhedgingeffectiveness.

ArecentstudybyLeeetal.(2007)reportsthatanincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallaffectsthebehaviouroffuturesprices,specificallyindicatingthatreturnvolatilityandtradingvolumeincreasedafterstockmarketclosewhentheTSEexpandedthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcall.Furthermore,thestudyalsoshowsthatpre-closestockreturnshaveagreatimpactonextendedfuturesreturnswhenthebatchingperiodislong.However,theimpactofincreasingthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallonfuturesclosingpriceefficiencyandhedgingeffectivenessisnotexamined,andthepresentstudyextendsuponthispreviousstudyandinvestigatesthisimpactwithstockindicesfutures.

Theempiricalresultsofthisstudyindicatethatthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesaffectsfuturespriceefficiencyandhedgingperformance.Specifically,theincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallimprovespriceefficiencyinfuturesclosingpricesandthenenhanceshedgingperformanceintermsofthehedgingrisksperspective.However,hedgingperformancewithrespecttoutility-maximizationdoesnotimprovewithalongerbatchingperiodofthestockclosingcall,whichcanbeexplainedbyanimprovementinpriceefficiencyatthefuturesmarketclose(seeFiglewski,1984).Theseempiricalresultsprovidepolicy-makerswithvaluableinformationontheimportanceoftheimpactofthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesonfuturesmarkets.

Theremainderofthisresearchisorganizedasfollows:

aliteraturereviewandhypothesesarepresentednext.Sections4and5describethedataandmethodologyusedinthispaper.Section6presentstheempiricalresultsandtheconclusionsarepresentedinSection7.

2.Literaturereview

Thedeterminationoftheoptimalhedgestrategyhasattractedconsiderableattentionfromfinancialeconometricians.Inthepublishedhedgeratioestimationliterature,theoptimalhedgeratioinastaticsenseisfullyaddressed.AstatichedgeratioproposedbyEderington(1979)isanordinaryleast-squaresregression-basedmethod.1Usingthismethod,Figlewski(1984)examinestheimpactofthedifferentsourcesofbasisriskonhedgingperformance,findingthathedgingdurationandtimetoexpirationaffectshedgingperformance.Thestudyalsosuggeststhatasthefuturesmarkethasdeveloped,overreactionoffuturespricestochangesinthespotindexhasdiminished.Nevertheless,Ederington's(1979)approachhasreceivedincreasingcriticism,particularlywithrespecttoaconstanthedgeratiothroughtime.

Previousstudieshavereportedthatatime-varyinghedgeratiocanenhancethedegreeofhedgeeffectivenessincomparisonwithastatichedgeratio.Toestimatethetime-varyinghedgeratio,recentstudiesusetheautoregressiveconditionalheteroscedastic(ARCH)andgeneralisedautoregressiveconditionalheteroscedastic(GARCH)-typemodelstocharacterizethebehaviourofhedgeratiosovertime.2Myers(1991)andBaillieandMyers(1991)indicatethatGARCH-typetime-varyingoptimalhedgeratiosoutperformconstanthedgeratios,andimplythatGARCHmodelsappearideallysuitedtoestimatingtime-varyingoptimalhedgeratios.3YangandAllen(2004)alsosuggestthattime-varyingGARCHhedgeratiosperformbetterthanconstanthedgeratiosintermsofminimizingrisks.Brooksetal.(2002)usetheasymmetricGARCHmodeltoestimatetime-varyinghedgeratios,findingthatthismodelgivesasuperiorin-samplehedgingperformance.Inarecentstudy,Hsuetal.(2008)introduceaclassofcopula-basedGARCHmodels,withouttheassumptionofmultivariatenormality,toestimatetime-varyinghedgeratios,findingthatdynamicconditionalcorrelation(DCC)GARCHmodelsperformmoreeffectivelythanconstantconditionalcorrelation(CCC)GARCHmodels,andcopula-basedGARCHmodelsoutperformotherdynamicmodels,intermsofhedgingeffectiveness.4,5

Ontheotherhand,thechoiceofmarketclearingfrequencyhasreceivedmuchattentioninthefieldofmarketmicrostructure.Previousstudieshavefoundthattheintroductionofaclosingcallcanenhancepriceefficiencyandreduceclosingpricemanipulation.AninfluentialpaperbyPaganoandSchwartz(2003)suggeststhattheintroductionofastockclosingcallisbeneficialtomarketquality,afterspecificallyexaminingEuronextParisandfindingthattheintroductionofaclosingcallreducesexecutioncostsandenhancespricediscovery.HillionandSuominen(2004)developanagency-basedmodeltoexplainthebehaviourofstockclosingprices,andindicatethattheintroductionofastockclosingcallcanreducemanipulationofclosingprices.

UtilizingdatafromtheAustralianStockExchange,Aitkenetal.(2005)suggestthattheclosingcallprovidesamechanismforconsolidatingliquidityandreducestransactioncosts.UsingdatafromtheSingaporeStockExchange,Comerton-Fordeetal.(2007)findthattheintroductionofopeningandclosingcallauctionscansignificantlyimprovepricediscoveryatopeningandclosing.Similarly,HuangandTsai(2008)reportthatadecreaseinmarketvolatilityandanincreaseinpriceefficiencywereachievedattheexpenseofadecreaseinmarketliquidityatthecloseoftradingdayswhentheTSEexpandedthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcall.

Insummary,previousstudieshavedevelopedvariousmodelstoestimateanoptimalhedgeratio.Additionally,recentresearchsuggeststhattheintroductionofastockclosingcallaffectsstockpricebehaviour.However,noresearchhasbeenperformedontheinfluenceofthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesonfuturespriceefficiencyandhedgingeffectiveness.Accordingly,thepresentstudyattemptstofillthisgap.

3.Theoreticalconsiderations

Anincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallcanimprovepriceefficiencyatthefuturesmarketcloseandenhancehedgingperformance.6HillionandSuominen(2004)proposethattheintroductionofastockclosingcallreducesthemanipulationofclosingprices,andHuangandTsai(2008)indicatethattheincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallintheTSEhaseffectivelyreducedmarketvolatilityatclosingandenhancedmarketefficiencybyreducingnoiseinstockclosingprices.Ontheotherhand,PaganoandSchwartz(2003)suggestthatthechangeinthedeterminationofstockclosingpricesmightaffectthederivativesmarkets.AssuggestedbyLeeetal.(2007),stockclosingpriceshavehadagreatimpactonextendedfuturestradingsincetheTSEexpandedthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcall.Hence,ifalongbatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallreducesstockmarketvolatilityandmanipulationofstockclosingprices,futuresclosingpriceswilltendtowardstheirintrinsicvalueswhenthebatchingperiodislong.Inthiscase,thehedgingriskwilldecreasebecauseofadecreaseinstockmarketvolatilityandareductionofmanipulationofstockandfuturesclosingprices.7

Accordingtotheabovearguments,thehypothesescanbestatedasfollows:

H1:

Anincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcallcanimprovepriceefficiencyatthefuturesmarketclose.

H2:

Hedgingperformancewillbeenhancedafteranincreaseinthelengthofthebatchingperiodofthestockclosingcall.

4.Data

Dailyclosingpricesforthreefuturesin

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 经管营销 > 经济市场

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2