Unit6.docx
《Unit6.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Unit6.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
Unit6
UnitSix
GettingAlongwithNature
WendellBerry
Text (Introductions:
Thereisafarcryofenvironmentalprotectionintheworld.WehumanbeinghavealreadyWendellBerryentertainstheopinionthatwewilldiminishourselvesifwediminishnature.Doyouagreewithhim?
)
1.Thedefendersofnatureandwilderness---liketheirenemiesthedefendersoftheindustrialeconomy---sometimessoundasifthenaturalandthehumanestatesweretwoseparateestates,radicallydifferentandradicallydivided.Thedefendersofnatureandwildernesssometimesseemtofeelthattheymustopposeanyhumanencroachmentwhatsoever,justastheindustrialistsoftenapparentlyfeelthattheymustmakethehumanencroachmentabsoluteor,astheysay,"completetheconquestofnature."Butthereisdangerinthisopposition,anditcanbebestdealtwithbyrealizingthatthesepureandseparatecategoriesarepureideasanddonototherwiseexist.
2.Purenature,anyhow,isnotgoodforhumanstolivein,andhumansdonotwanttoliveinit---ornotforverylong.Anyexposuretotheelementsthatlastsmorethanafewhourswillremindusofthedesirabilityofthebasichumanamenities:
clothing,shelter,cookedfood,thecompanyofkinfolkandfriends---perhapsevenofhotbathsandmusicandbooks.
3.Itisequallytrueaconditionthatispurelyhumanisnotgoodforpeopletolivein,andpeopledonotwanttoliveforverylonginit.Obviously,themoreartificialahumanenvironmentbecomes,themoretheword"natural"becomesatermofvalue.Itcanbeargued,indeed,thattheconservationmovement,asweknowittoday,islargelyaproductoftheindustrialrevolution.Thepeoplewhowantcleanair,clearstreams,andwildforests,prairies,anddesertsarethepeoplewhonolongerhavethem.
4.Peoplecannotliveapartfromnature;thatisthefirstprincipleoftheconservationists.Andyet,peoplecannotliveinnaturewithoutchangingit.Butthisistrueofallcreatures;theydependuponnature,andtheychangeit.Whatwecallnatureis,inasense,thesumofthechangesmadebyallthevariouscreaturesandnaturalforcesintheirintricateactionsandinfluencesuponeachotherandupontheirplaces.Becauseofthewoodpeckers,natureisdifferentfromwhatitwouldbewithoutthem.Itisdifferentalsobecauseoftheborersandantsthatliveintreetrunks,andbecauseofthebacteriathatliveinthesoilunderthetrees.Themakingofthesedifferencesisthemakingoftheworld.
5.Someofthechangesmadebywildcreatureswewouldcallbeaversarefamousformakingpondsthatturnintofertilemeadows;treesandprairiegrassesbuildsoil.Butsometimes,too,wewouldcallnaturalchangesdestructive.Accordingtoearlywitnesses,forinstance,largeareasaroundKentuckysaltlickswereseverelytrampledanderodedbythegreatherdsofhoofedanimalsthatgatheredthere.Thebuffalo"streets"throughhillycountryweresohollowedoutbyhoofwearanderosionthattheyremainvisiblealmosttwocenturiesafterthedisappearanceofthebuffalo.Andsoitcanhardlybeexpectedthathumanswouldnotchangenature.Humans,likeallothercreatures,mustmakeadifference;otherwise,theycannotlive.Butunlikeothercreatures,humansmustmakeachoiceastothekindandscaleofthedifferencetheymake.Iftheychoosetomaketoosmalladifference,theydiminishtheirhumanity.Iftheychoosetomaketoogreatadifference,theydiminishnature,andnarrowtheirsubsequentchoices;ultimately,theydiminishordestroythemselves.Nature,then,isnotonlyoursourcebutalsoourlimitandmeasure.Or,asthepostEdmundSpenserputitalmostfourhundredyearsago.Nature,whoisthe"greatestgoddesse",actsasasortofearthlylieutenantofGod,andSpenserrepresentsherasbothamotherandjudge.Herjurisdictionisovertherelationsbetweenthecreatures;shedeals“Righttoall...indifferently,”forsheis“theequalmother”ofall“Andknittesteachtoeach,asbrotheruntobrother.”Thus,inSpenser,thenaturalprinciplesoffertilityandorderarepointedlylinkedwiththeprincipleofjustice,whichwemaybealittlesurprisedtoseethatheattributesalsotonature.Andyetinhisinsistenceonan“indifferent”naturaljustice,restingonthe“brotherhood”ofallcreatures,notjustofhumans,Spenserwouldnowbesaidtobeonsoundecologicalfooting.
6.Innatureweknowthatwildcreaturessometimesexhausttheirvitalsourcesandsufferthenaturalremedy:
drasticpopulationreductions.Iflynxeseattoomanysnowshoerabbits---whichtheyaresaidtodorepeatedly---thenthelynxesstarvedowntothecarryingcapacityoftheirhabitat.Itisthecarryingcapacityofthelynx'shabitat,notthecarryingcapacityofthelynx'sstomach,thatdeterminestheprosperityoflynxes.Similarly,ifhumansuseuptoomuchsoil---whichtheyhaveoftendoneandaredoing---thentheywillstarvedowntothecarryingcapacityoftheirhabitat.Thisisnature's"indifferent"justice.AsSpensersawinthesixteenthcentury,andaswemustlearntoseenow,thereisnoappealfromthisjustice.Inthefuture,theLordmayforgiveourwrongsagainstnature,butonearth,sofarasweknow,Hedoesnotoverturnherdecisions.
7.Oneofthedifferencesbetweenhumansandlynxesisthathumanscanseethattheprincipleofbalanceoperatesbetweenlynxesandsnowshoerabbits,asbetweenhumansandtopsoil;anotherdifference,wehope,isthathumanshavethesensetoactontheirunderstanding.Wecansee,too,thatastablebalanceispreferabletoabalancethattiltsbackandforthlikeaseesaw,dumpingasurplusofcreaturesalternatelyfromeitherend.Tosaythisistorenewthequestionofwhetherornotthehumanrelationshipwithnatureisnecessarilyanadversaryrelationship,anditistosuggestthattheanswerisnotsimple.
8.Butindealingwiththisquestionandintryingtodojusticetothepresumedcomplexityoftheanswer,weareupagainstanAmericanconventionofsimpleoppositiontonaturethatisdeeplyestablishedbothinourmindsandinourways.WehaveopposedtheprimevalforestsoftheEastandtheprimevalprairiesanddesertsoftheWest,wehaveopposedman-eatingbeastsandcrop-eatinginsects,sheep-eatingwolvesandchicken-eatinghawks.Inourlawnsandgardensandfields,weopposewhatwecallweeds.Andyetmoreandmoreofusarebeginningtoseethatthisoppositionisultimatelydestructiveevenofourselves,thatitdoesnotexplainmanythingsthatneedexplaining—inshort,thatitisuntrue.
9.Ifourproperrelationtonatureisnotopposition,thenwhatisit?
Thisquestionbecomescomplicatedanddifficultforusbecausenoneofus,asIhavesaid,wantstoliveina"pure"primevalforestorina"pure"primevalprairie;wedonotwanttobeeatenbygrizzlybears;ifwearegardeners,wehavealegitimatequarrelwithweeds;if,inKentucky,wearetryingtoimproveourpastures,wearelikelytobeenemiesofthenoddingthistle.But,dowhatwewill,weremainunderthespelloftheprimevalforestsandprairiesthatwehavecutdownandbroken;weturnrepeatedlyandwithlovetothethoughtofthemandtotheirsurvivingremnants.Wefindourselvesattractedtothegrizzlybears,too,andknowthattheyandothergreat,dangerousanimalsremainaliveinourimaginationsastheyhavebeenallthroughhumantime.Thoughwecutdownthenoddingthistles,weacknowledgetheirbeautyandaregladtothinkthattheremustbesomeplacewheretheybelong.(Theymay,infact,notalwaysbeoutofplaceinpastures;if,asseemsevident,overgrazingmakesanidealseedbedfortheseplants,thenwemustunderstandthemasapartofnature'sstrategytoprotectthegroundagainstabusebyanimals.)Eventheugliestgardenweedsearnaffectionfromuswhenweconsiderhowfaithfullytheyperformanindispensabledutyincoveringthebaregroundandinbuildinghumus.Theweeds,too,areinvolvedinthebusinessoffertility.
10.Weknow,then,thattheconflictbetweenthehumanandthenaturalestatesreallyexistsandthatitistosomeextentnecessary.Butwearelearning,orrelearning,somethingelse,too,thatfrightensus:
namely,thatthisconflictoftenoccursattheexpenseofbothestates.Itisnotonlypossiblebutaltogetherprobablethatbydiminishingnaturewediminishourselves,andviceversa.
TranslatingandWriting:
A.TranslatethefollowingtwoparagraphsintoChinese.
1.AsthepoetEdmundSpenserputitalmostfourhundredyearsago.Nature,whoisthe"greatestgoddess,"actsasasortofearthlylieutenantofGod,andSpenserrepresentsherasbothamotherandjudge.||Herjurisdictionisovertherelationsbetweenthecreatures;shedeals"Righttoall...indifferently,"forsheis"theequalmother"ofall"andknittesteachtoeach,asbrotheruntobrother."||Thus,inSpenser,thenaturalprinciplesoffertilityandorderarepointedlylinkedwiththeprincipleofjustice,whichwemaybealittlesurprisedtoseethatheattributesalsotonature.||Andyetinhisinsistenceonan"indifferent"naturaljustice,restingonthe"brotherhood"ofallcreatures,notjustofhumans,Spenserwouldnowbesaidtobeonsoundecologicalfooting.
2.Ifourproperrelationtonatureisnotopposition,thenwhatisit?
||Thisquestionbecomescomplicatedanddifficultforusbecausenoneofus,asIhavesaid,wantstoliveina"pure"primevalforestorina"pure"primevalprairie;wedonotwanttobeeatenbygrizzlybears;||ifwearegardeners,wehavealegitimatequarrelwithweeds;if,inKentucky,wearetryingtoimproveourpastures,wearelikelytobeenemiesofthenoddingthistle.||But,dowhatwewill,weremainunderthespelloftheprimevalfores