完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板.docx

完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板.docx

《完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

完整版SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

ListofResponses

DearEditorsandReviewers:

Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”（ID:

文章稿号）.Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:

Respondstothereviewer’scomments:

Reviewer#1:

1.Responsetocomment:

（……简要列出意见……）

Response:

××××××

2.Responsetocomment:

（……简要列出意见……）

Response:

××××××

。

。

。

。

。

。

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……...

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……

WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.

Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion

AsReviewersuggestedthat……

ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.

Reviewer#2:

同上述

Reviewer#3:

××××××

Otherchanges:

1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”

2.Line107,“……”wasadded

3.Line129,“……”wasdeleted

××××××

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.

Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions

以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。

与大家分享。

从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。

这些意见

分布在文章的各个地方。

我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。

看到这些意见，

我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高

文章的质量。

从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。

对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。

记得ACSStyleGuide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这

也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。

因此，作者就是要

修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。

因此：

有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。

============================================

Reviewers'comments:

Reviewer#3:

Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.

1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.

2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?

3.Experimentalpart:

Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.

4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup（page4）canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.

5.ReslutsPart（Page6）:

"COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages",themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?

Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?

6.Page12,2ndpara:

ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?

Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn'tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B.etc.tobecorrected.

7.Page14,1stpara:

'contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy',butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature.

8.Pages14through17:

theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface（figs3&4）hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?

CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.

9.Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para1:

Itwasgeneralizedthat.........,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.

10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy.

===============================================

DearEditor,

Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments.NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable.Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.

[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction.HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.

[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e.,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.

[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound（containingtwocarbonylgroups）todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow-coverageCO（comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy）attheliquid-solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid-phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies.MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2.

[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation.

[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1.

[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0.85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30-45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn’tchange,indicating60minisalreadyenough.AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasafunctionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.

[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks.ThementionofFig.7aand7betc.throughoutthetextwereallcorrected.

[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.Wesawthedamageofo-ringafterusinghigh-concentrationEtPy.AreferencetotheVitono-ringinformationwasgiven.

[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.

[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.

[10]Thetoo-longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.

Inall,Ifoundthereviewer’scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaperpoint-by-point.Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!

==============================================

结果：

http:

//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.005

欢迎浏览：

OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces（Review）

Z.Ma,F.Zaera*,SurfaceScenceReports61（2006）229-281.

ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry

http:

//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.03.001

CI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

ListofResponses

DearEditorsandReviewers:

Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”（ID:

文章稿号）.Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:

Respondstothereviewer’scomments:

Reviewer#1:

1.Responsetocomment:

（……简要列出意见……）

Response:

××××××

2.Responsetocomment:

（……简要列出意见……）

Response:

××××××

。

。

。

。

。

。

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...

Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……...

ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……

WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.

Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion

AsReviewersuggestedthat……

ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.

Reviewer#2:

同上述

Reviewer#3:

××××××

Otherchanges:

1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”

2.Line107,“……”wasadded

3.Line129,“……”wasdeleted

××××××

Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.

WeappreciateforEditors/Re