mental lexicon.docx
《mental lexicon.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《mental lexicon.docx(16页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
![mental lexicon.docx](https://file1.bingdoc.com/fileroot1/2023-5/5/68eece4c-22c7-4076-b2f7-61e1f7838711/68eece4c-22c7-4076-b2f7-61e1f78387111.gif)
mentallexicon
1mentallexicon
Thelate1960swasassociatedwiththebirthofthestudyofthementallexicon.Thestudyofthementallexiconisasubfieldofpsycholinguistics.Byusingboththeoriesofpsychologyandlinguistics,thepsycholinguisticstudyoflanguagedealswiththementalprocesseswhichareinvolvedinlanguageacquisition,production,andcomprehension.Mentallexicon,alsocalledmentaldictionary,internallexiconorsubjectivelexicon.Treisman(242-48)[文献tresiman,A.M.“contextualcuesinselectivelistening.”quaterlyjournalofexperimentalpsychology12(1960):
242-48],whoisthefirsttoproposetheconceptofmentallexiconin1964,holdsthatthementallexiconisarepositoryofalltheinformationthatareaderoralistenerhasconcerningwordsofalanguage.Accordingtohim,itisineveryspeaker’smindthatexistsawellorganizedsystemoflexicalrepresentationwhichconsistsofword’sspelling,soundandmeaning.Uptillnow,amonglinguists,psychologistsandanthropologists,theissueofmentallexiconstudieshascausedgreatconcern.Differentdefinitionofthistermhasbeengivenbydifferentscholars.ThedefinitionofmentallexicongivenbyJ.C.Richardsetal.(2000)isamentalsystemthatcontainsalltheinformationapersonknowsaboutwords.AccordingtoAitchison(1994)[文献Aitchison,J.wordsinthemind:
anintroductiontothementallexicon[M].2nded.Oxford:
Blackwell,1994],mentallexicon,alsocalledmentaldictionary,referstotherepresentationofwordsandtheirmeaningstoredpermanentlyinthememory.
1.1Thedifferencesbetweenmentallexiconanddictionary
Thementallexiconisamentalphenomenonwhichisbeyondourreach.Asmentionedabove,mentallexiconiscalledmentaldictionary.Comparingmentallexiconandtraditionbookdictionarycanmakesmentallexiconunderstoodeasily.Thesedifferencesaresummarizedasthefollowing:
First,thetraditionalbookdictionaryisorganizedinthealphabeticalorder,whilethementallexiconisnot.Asexperimentresultshow,thesemanticandphonologicalfactorstendtoaffecttheaccessofthementallexicon
second,thenumberofwordsthatabookdictionarycontainsisdefiniteandfixed,whichwouldpossiblemakethemeaningfallbehindtheconstantlydevelopmentoflanguage.Thatistosay,bookdictionaryisstatic.Incontrast,thementallexiconisdynamic.Becausetheuserscanchangeitbyaddingandcreatingnewmeaningsornewpronunciationstotheoriginalwords,byabsorbingnewwordsandbydeletingsomeout-of-datewords.
Third,thementallexiconismorecomplexandcontainsmoreinformationthanabookdictionary.Bookdictionarieslistonlyonepronunciationortwoforeachword,whileineverydaylife,aspecificwordindifferentspeaker’smentallexiconislikelytohavemorethanonepronunciation.Moreover,bookdictionaryonlycontainsverbalinformation,incontrast,thementallexiconcontainsnotverbalbutalsothenon-verbalinformation.Adictionarydefinitionofawordonlyincludesdenotationinformation.Mentallexiconcontainsbothdenotationandconnotationmeaningofaword.Mentallexicalcontainsnotonlymoresyntacticinformationaboutanentrythanabookdictionarydoesbutalsotheencyclopediaknowledgeaboutthisword.
Fourth,thewordsinbookdictionaryarearrangedseparated,thusittakesthesametimetolookupafrequentlyusedwordandaninfrequentlyusedone.Thewordsinmentallexiconconstituteaninterrelatednetworkthustheretrievetimeisinfluencesbyfrequencyeffect,thatistosay,thefrequentlyusedwordsaremorerapidlyretrievedfromthementallexicon.
1.2TheInternalStructureoftheBasicUnit-theLexicalEntry
AccordingtoLevelt,alexicalentryinL1containsfourkindsofspecifications:
Forexample,theentry‘do’canbedividedintofourpartswiththesemanticinformationas“toperform,carryout”,thesyntacticinformationas“usedasantransitiveverb”,themorphologicalinformationas“doservesasarootformwithitsthird-personpresent-tenseinflectionasdoes,past-tenseinflectionasdidandpastparticipleasdoneetc.”andtheformalinformationas“amonosyllabicconstantvowelsequence,with/d/asconstantand/u:
/asvowel”.Thedifferenttypeofinformationcanberepresentedintwocomponentswhichcomposealexicalentry:
thelemmaandthelexeme.Thelemmaincludesthesemanticinformationandsyntacticinformation.Thelexemecontainsmorphologicalinformationandphonologicalinformation.
Infact,thesedifferentkindsofspecificationareintegratedwithineachlexicalentry.Thiskindofintegrationintolexicalentriesneedsanextensive,highlycontextualizedexposuretothelanguage.Oncetheentryisopened,allkindsofinformationautomaticallyaregetaccessed.Becauseofthehighly-contextualizedinput,anL1learnerisabletoextractthesemantic,syntactic,morphologicalandphonologicalinformationoftheword.
1.3Organizationofmentallexicon
Aitchisonmaintainedthatvocabularyinmentallexiconisneitherinalphabeticorderlikethatinadictionary,noradisorderedcollectionofwords.theevidenceofwordassociationtaskssupportedthatwordsareorganizednotonlyonthebasisofphoneticandspelling,butalsoonthebasisifsenserelationship.Wehavehadgottenaboutthesenserelationsmoreovertheideaofanetworkofconceptsisvaluable.Inaddition,weknowthatthebrainiscomposedofneuronsthatareconnectedatsynapsestootherneurons.Theideaofnetworkissameasthecentralnervoussystem.Thesemaketheideaofnetworkmoreattractive.
Therearemainlytwokindsofnetworkmodels:
hierarchicalnetworkmodelsandspreadingactivationmodels.
1.2.1HierarchicalNetworkModels
Thehierarchicalmodel,whichwasthemostearliestandthemostinfluentialmodelofL1mentallexicon,wasproposedbyCollinsandQuilliansin1969.Inahierarchicalnetwork,thenetworkishierarchicalwithsomeelementsstandingaboveorbelowothers.Itresemblesthesemanticfieldtheoryinwhichtherearesuperordinates,subordinatesandcoordinates.TheresearchofCollinsandQuillian(1969)isaprototypeofthisapproach.ThemodelisshowninFigure2.
Inthemodel,conceptssimilartothewordarerepresentedasdistinctnodesinanetworkofcategoryrelationsthatdealwithhyponymyandpropertyrelationsthatindicatewhatcharacteristicsmaybeattributedtotheitemsatvariouslevelsinthenetwork.CollinsandQuillianputforwardthecognitiveeconomyprinciplethatassumedthespaceavailableforthestorageofsemanticinformationwaslimited,sothatitwouldbebeneficialtostoreinformationonlyinoneplaceinthenetwork.Theyalsoassumedthattheinformationwouldbestoredonlyatthehighestpossiblenode.
However,problemsoccurredwiththemodelbecausethemodelassumedthatalltheitemsonagivenlevelofthehierarchyweremoreorlessequal.Thismadeitimpossibletoexplainthetypicalityeffect:
itemsthataremoretypicalofagivensubordinatetakelesstimetoverifythanatypicalitemsintruestatement;theoppositeistrueforfalsestatements.
1.2.2SpreadingActivationModels
Aalternativemodelwasproposebymodifyingoftherigidhierarchicalassumptionswhileretainingtheconceptofnetwork.ThiskindofmodelsisreferredtoasspreadingactivationmodelsthatfirstproposedbyCollinsandLoftus(1975).Themodelsuggeststhatmentallexiconisnotstoredinastricthierarchicalorderinthenetwork.Incontrast,theorganizationisanetworkofinterconnectedelementsandthedistancebetweenthenodesisdeterminedbyfunctionalfactorsandstructuralproperty.Thustheretrievalofawordbecomesaspreadofactivation.Thatistosay,whenawordisretrieved,theactivationstartsatthissinglenodeandthenspreadsalongtheassociativepathwayindifferentdirectionsandeventotheentirenetwork.Thisactivationbecomesweakeroverdistance,thusmakessurethatthecloselyrelatedconceptsaremorelikelytobeactivatedthandistantconcepts.
Figureisanexemplificationofthespreadingactivationmodel.
ThespreadingactivationmodelofCollinsandLoftushaslimitations.Themodelissemanticnetworkanditneglectsthephonological,syntacticandmorphologicalaspectsofwords,whichareimportantinformationofalexicalentryinthementallexicon.
AmorereasonablespreadingactivationmodelisproposedbyBockandLevelt(1994),whichisbasedonLevelt’spropositionofcomponentsinalexicalentry.Themodifiedspreadingactivationmodelincorporateslexicalaswellasconceptualaspects.Theconceptualsyntacticandphonologicalinformationareincorporatedatthreedifferentlevels:
conceptuallevel,lemmalevelandlexemelevel.Theconceptuallevelcontainsnodesthatrepresentconceptsandnodesthatareconnectedtooneanotherbyvariousrelations.Thesecondlevelisthelemmalevelwhichconsistsofsyntacticaspectofwordknowledge.Finally,thereisalexemelevel.Thelexemecontainsaword’sphonologicalproperties,ororthographicalproperties.
Figure4cangiveusanillustrationofthismodifiedmodel.
2.L2mentallexical
2.1representation
IWeinreich’coordinate,compoundandsubordinatemodel
Asearlyasalmostfourdecadesyearsago,Weinreich(1953)putforwardtheideaofdifferentcategoriesofwordknowledgeinthebilingual’smind.Theyarecompoundcoordinateandsubordinatemodel.
ThreeorganizationofwordknowledgeintheBilingual’smind
(adaptedfromWeinreich(1953))
Inthecoordinatepattern,thebilingualsstorethewordsintwoseparatenetworkofformmeaningconnections.Thismeansthatawordinbilingual’sfirstlanguageanditstranslationinhissecondlanguagearerepresentedintwoconceptualforms,oneforthe