食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx

上传人:聆听****声音 文档编号:3657214 上传时间:2023-05-02 格式:DOCX 页数:16 大小:21.91KB
下载 相关 举报
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共16页
食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共16页
亲,该文档总共16页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx

《食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx(16页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

食品和药品安全外文文献翻译2018-2019文档格式.docx

Abstract

Emergingtechnologiesareplayingamajorroleinthegenerationofnewapproachestoassessthesafetyofbothfoodsanddrugs.However,the integration of emerging technologies in the regulatorydecision-makingprocessrequiresrigorousassessmentandconsensusamongstinternationalpartnersandresearchcommunities.Tothatend,theGlobal Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) inpartnershipwiththeBrazilianHealthSurveillanceAgency(ANVISA)hostedtheseventhGlobalSummitonRegulatoryScience(GSRS17)inBrasilia,BrazilonSeptember18–20,2017todiscusstheroleofnewapproachesinregulatorysciencewithaspecificemphasisonapplicationsinfoodandmedicalproductsafety.Theglobalregulatorylandscapeconcerningtheapplicationofnewtechnologieswasassessedinseveralcountriesworldwide.Challengesandissueswerediscussedinthecontextofdevelopinganinternationalconsensusforobjectivecriteriainthedevelopment,applicationandreviewofemergingtechnologies.Theneedforadvancedapproachestoallowforfaster,lessexpensiveandmorepredictivemethodologieswaselaborated.Inaddition,thestrengthsand

16

weaknessesofeachnewapproachwasdiscussed.Andfinally,theneedforstandardsandreproducibleapproacheswasreviewedtoenhancetheapplicationoftheemergingtechnologiestoimprovefoodanddrugsafety.TheoverarchinggoalofGSRS17wastoprovideavenuewhereregulatorsandresearchersmeettodevelopcollaborationsaddressingthemostpressingscientificchallengesandfacilitatetheadoptionofnoveltechnicalinnovationstoadvancethefieldofregulatoryscience.

Keywords:

Globalcoalition,Emergingtechnologies,Foodsafety,

Drugsafety,Regulatoryagencies,Alternativemethods,Bestpractices,Cross-training

Introduction

Emerging technologies for food anddrug safetyassessmentrepresentagrowthareaforregulatorysciences.Withthegoaloffaster,lessexpensiveandmorepredictiveassessmentapproaches,manynewtechnologieshavebeenproposed.Althoughsomeofthesenewassessmentapproacheshavegainedconsiderableattention,fewifanyhavebeenuniversallyacceptedasavailabletoreplaceexistingtestingparadigms.Withthisinmindthefocusofthe7thannualGlobalSummitonRegulatoryScience(GSRS17)wasEmergingTechnologiesforFoodandDrugSafety.GSRS17isaninternationalconferenceheldundertheauspicesoftheGlobalCoalitionforRegulatoryScienceResearch(GCRSR),withthegoalofdiscussinginnovativetechnologiesand

developingpartnershipstoenhancetranslationofbasicscienceintoregulatory applications within the global context. The conferenceprovidesaninteractiveplatformforscientistsfromgovernment,industry,andacademic-researchcommunitiestoobjectivelyassesstheutilityofemerging technologies (such asnanotechnology, imaging,omicsfortranslational science, precision medicine,bioinformaticapproaches,medicalproductsafety,andfoodsafety)foraddressingregulatoryresearch questionsandtodiscussthebestwaytotranslatethesetechnologiesintoreal-worldapplications.GSRS17alsoallowedtheopportunitytoexchangeviewsandpracticesthatcanassisttheregulatoryresearch community in harmonizing educational and trainingopportunitiesworld-wide.

Globalregulatorylandscape

Tocomparethestatusofregulatoryscienceasappliedtofoodanddrugsafetyaroundtheworld,theGlobalRegulatoryLandscapewasassessed.TofocusthepresentationsfromBrazil,theEuropeanUnion,NigeriaandJapan,severalcommonquestionswereaddressedbythepresenters.Theseincluded:

1)Whatarethecommonregulatoryscienceissues and practices across governmental agencies?

2) Whichinfrastructure/mechanismshouldbedevelopedtoaddressthesecommonissues andpractices?

3) Howdoyou envisionthe cross-trainingopportunitiestofacilitateknowledgetobeexchangedacrossagencies?

Dr.MeiruzeSousaFreitas,DeputyDirector,AuthorizationandHealthRegistry,BrazilianHealthSurveillanceAgency(ANVISA),describedthatANVISAhasahierarchybasedonlegislationandacompetencytoeditlegislationonhealthsurveillance-relatedsubjects.ANVISAisveryconnectedtotheglobalcommunityandtheGoodRegulatoryPracticesProcess.Internationalapproachesandinformationarecollectedthroughcontactwithauthoritiesanddiscussionsbasedonthetechnicalprocedureswithinternationalcooperationgroups.

InANVISA,regulationiscoordinatedbytwooffices:

DrugGeneralManagementOffice(GGMED)andFoodGeneralManagementOffice(GGALI), whicharesubordinate tothe AuthorizationandHealthRegistrationDirectory(DIARE).TheGGMEDiscomposedoftheOfficeof Safety and Efficacy Evaluation (GESEF), the DepartmentofTherapeuticEquivalence(CETER),theDrugRegistrationEvaluationOffice(GRMED),theOfficeofSpecificandHerbalDrugsRegistrationEvaluation (GMESP), and the Office of Post-Approval ChangesEvaluation(GEPRE).Thestaffconsistsofhealthregulationexperts,regulationtechniciansandadministrativepersonnelincludingawiderangeofprofessionals,namely,biologists,bio-medics,chemists,doctors,engineers,lawyers,pharmacists,physiciansandstatisticians.GGMEDperformsdrugregistrationthroughevaluationofdrugsapplications,post-approvalchangeapplicationsanddrugregistrationrenewal.Other

actionsconnectedare“insitu”inspectionsoftheapplicationsmentioned,implementationofauditsontheapplicationreviewprocess,inspectionsonpharmaceuticalequivalenceandbioequivalence/bioavailabilitycenters,evaluationofsafetyandefficacy(clinicaltrials),anddrafting/reviewinglegislation.RecentimprovementstoANVISA'

sreviewprocessincludesystematicstandardizedapproachestothebenefit/riskassessmentofmedicinesandmovingtowardsstepwiseimplementationofGoodReviewPractices(GRevP).

ANVISA'

sothermajorcomponentistheFoodGeneralManagement

Office(GGALI).ItencompassestheRiskAssessmentandEffectivenessOffice(GEARE),theFoodRegistrationOffice(GEREG) andthePost-Registration Food Office (GEPRA). The professional teamreviewing at GGALI consists of health regulation experts andadministrativepersonnel,includingseveralprofessionals,suchasfoodengineers,biologists,pharmacists,nutritionistsandveterinarians.Asanoverviewofthenationalfoodsafetycontrolsystem,the primaryproduction istheresponsibilityoftheagriculturalagencies,whileresponsibilityforthesubsequentstagesofproductionissharedbetweenthehealthandagricultureagencies.Actionsoftheseagenciesarelargelyco-dependent.InBrazil,foodhealthcontrolisamixedmodel.Inpre-marketing,assessmentinvolveshealthpromotion,registerandsafetyassessment,andfoodstandards.

In summary, ANVISA uses best practices and internationalguidelinestocreateBrazil'

sstandards.Informationisfrequentlyobtainedby contact with other regulatory and international agencies andcommunicationusingexistingtechnicalknowledgebasesavailableonvariouswebsitesandconfidentialinformationexchangewithotherregulatoryauthorities.

Hans-GeorgEichler,MD,MSc,SeniorMedicalOfficer,EuropeanMedicinesAgency(EMA),UnitedKingdom(UK),EU,focusedonregulatory science and the evolving role ofpharmacovigilance.Pharmacovigilancestemsfromthe1970sandmeans“closewatch”.Itisthepracticeofmonitoringtheeffectsofmedicaldrugsfollowinglicensureandmarketentry,especiallytoidentifyandevaluatepreviouslyunreportedadversereactions.Itisthescienceandactivitiesrelatedtodetection,assessment,understandingandpreventionofadverseeffectsoranyotherdrug-relatedproblem.

Dr.Eichlerdescribedsomeofthedifficultiesencounteredwhenpracticingprecisionmedicine.Oftenthestratificationcriterionisnotcompletelyunderstood,thenumbersofpatientsaresmallerbutthereareadvancedtherapies(gene,cell,tissue-based),andsomeofthemaretrulypersonalized. Personalized treatment combinations are even morecomplexinthatthescientistsmustdealwithsmallpatientnumbersanditissometimesdifficulttodefineclinicalindications.Dr.Eichleralso

highlighted thedifference(s)betweenefficacyandeffectivenessinclinicalpractice.Efficacyistheextenttowhichaninterventiondoesmoregoodthanharmunderidealcircumstances(monitoringthepatienttakingthedrug).Effectivenessistheextenttowhichaninterventiondoesmoregoodthanharmwhenprovidedundertheusualcircumstancesofhealthcarepractice.Accountingforheterogeneitywillleadtomorepreciseprecisionmedicineandadifferentapproachtodrugdevelopment.Dr.Eichleralsomentionedthatitisverylikelythatregulatorsandthehealthdeliverysystemwillneedtoshiftsomehealthcarepracticesinthefutureincaseweaccountforheterogeneity.

Dr.Eichlerbelievesthatthefutureevolutionofpharmacovigilancewillbefacilitatedbypay-for-performanceandpre-licensingofrealworlddata.Thiswillbethepinnacleofindividualizedpharmacovigilance.Therewillbeashiftfrompopulationtopatientlevel,frompredictiontoobservation-based decision-making. Treatment responsive andnon-responsivewillbeidentified,andtheuseofpatient-leveloutcomeswouldenableoutcome-basedcontractingand,perhapsfurtherimprovepatientsafetyandpublichealthbyfocusingonpatientexperiences.Dr.Eichler concluded by emphasizing that the development ofpharmacovigilancewilllikelybringshiftsoffocusfromsafety-onlytobenefitsandharms,frompharmacovigilancetoknowledgegeneration,andfrompopulationfocustopatient-levelfoc

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > IT计算机 > 电脑基础知识

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2