Systemic riskWord文档格式.docx
《Systemic riskWord文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Systemic riskWord文档格式.docx(23页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
SiewHongTeoh(PaulMerageSchoolofBusiness,UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine,California,USA)
Citation:
DavidHirshleifer,SiewHongTeoh,(2009)"
Applicationstotaxandaccountingpolicy"
JournalofFinancialEconomicPolicy,Vol.1Iss:
2,pp.128-142
DOIhttp:
//dx.doi.org/10.1108/175********010245
Downloads:
Thefulltextofthisdocumenthasbeendownloaded502timessince2009
Acknowledgements:
TheauthorswouldliketothankSheridanTitmanforvaluableinsightsanddiscussionsinthedevelopmentofthispaper.
Abstract:
Purpose
–Sometimesresourcesarebadlyemployedbecauseofcoordinationfailures.Actionsbydecisionmakersthataffectthelikelihoodofsuchfailuresaresometimessaidtocause“systemicrisk.”Thispaperseekstoconsidertheexternalityinthechoiceofexanteriskmanagementpoliciesbyindividualsandfirms,concernedwithprivaterisk,notwiththeircontributiontosystemicrisk.
Design/methodology/approach
–Theimplicationsfordebatesoverfairvalueaccountingareconsidered.
Findings
–Oneconsequenceisthatindividualsandfirmsbecomeoverleveragedfromasocialviewpoint.Therecentcreditcrisisexemplifiestheimportanceofthisproblem.TheUStaxsystemtaxesequitymoreheavilythandebt,andthereforeexacerbatesthebiastowardoverleveraging.Apossiblesolutionistoreduceoreliminatetaxationofcorporateincomeandcapitalgains.Preparednessexternalitiescanalsocausefirmstobecometootransparent,andtherebysubjecttofinancialruns.
Originality/value
–Thepaperoffersinsightsintosystemicrisk,coordinationfailures,andpreparednessexternalities,focusingontaxandaccountingpolicy.
Keywords:
Riskanalysis,Taxation,Accountingpolicy,Economicconditions,UnitedStatesofAmerica
Type:
Researchpaper
Publisher:
EmeraldGroupPublishingLimited
Article
1Introduction
1.1Preparednessexternalities,coordinationfailures,andcrises
Accordingtomacroeconomictheory,sometimescoordinationfailurescauseresourcestobebadlyemployed.Duringrecessions,individualshavetroublefindingjobsand,despitetheavailabilityofcheaplaborandotherinputs,firmsstockpilecashandrefrainfromhiringandinvesting.
Discussionsoffinancialcrisesoftenconsider“systemicrisk”thatarisesfromthepossibilitythatthefailureofoneorafewlargefinancialfirmscouldcreateachainreactionthatdamagestheentirefinancialsystem.Therecentfinancialcrisishashighlightedtheinterdependenceoffinancialfirmsandtheimportanceofsystemicrisk.
Failureofthefinancialsysteminturncancausecoordinationfailuresintherealeconomy.Iffirmscannotraisecapitaleasily,theyneedtoreduceinvestment,cutemployment,andstockpilecash.Sotheproblemofmanagingsystemicriskispartofthegeneralproblemofavoidingcoordinationfailures.
Problemsofsystemicriskareusuallydiscussedfromtheviewpointofregulatorslimitingtheexcessiverisk‐takingoffinancialfirms.However,thisbegsthequestionofwhyprivatefirmswouldwanttotakeexcessiverisk.Thereisanobviousexplanationinthecaseofbanks,sincedepositinsuranceprovidesagovernmentsubsidytorisk‐taking.Butmoregenerally,settingasidetheprospectofexpostgovernmentrescuesorbailouts[1],itisnotentirelyclearwhyhedgefunds,investmentbanks,insurancecompanies,andotherfinancialentities–aswellasindustrialfirms–wouldwanttotakeexcessiverisk.
Thereareofcourse,severalspecificexplanationsthathavebeenoffered.Forexample,itisoftensaidthatthecompensationcontractsoffundmanagersorinvestmentbankersencourageexcessiverisk‐taking.Corporatemanagersaresaidtobedriventoriskbystockoptioncompensation.Alternatively,equity‐basedcompensationandreputationalconsiderationsaresaidtoprovideexcessiveincentivestofocusontheshort‐term,sothatduringabubble,whilethemusicisplaying,financialmanagersfeeltheyhavetokeepdancing.
Regardlessoftheirvalidity,atleastsomeoftheseargumentsarenotfundamental.Forexample,ifhedgefundcompensationencouragesexcessiverisktaking,itwouldbefeasibletoofferamoreconcavecompensationschemethatencourageslessrisk‐taking.Corporatemanagerscouldbegivenmoresalaryandfeweroptions[2].
Wearguethatthemorefundamentalproblemisamismatchbetweentheprivateandsocialcostsofrisk‐taking.Aninvestordoesnotmindthatthefundorfirmheinvestsincontributestosystemicrisk,becausetheinvestordoesnotbearthefullcostofthiscontribution.Itisthisexternalitywhichallowscompensationcontractsandinstitutionalformstopersistthatresultinexcessiveriskfromasocialpointofview.
Ingeneral,individualsandfirmscantakemanykindsofprioractionsthatpreparethemforadversemacroeconomicshocks.Theycanundertakeformalriskmanagementstrategiessuchasaprogramforhedging,deleverage,andmaintainahighercashbuffer,followdisclosureandreportingpoliciesthatmakeithardoreasyforstakeholderstoseewhetherthefirmisintrouble,anddesigncontracts,institutions,andincentiveschemesthatpreventagentsfromtakingexcessiverisk.Wecallchoicesthatmakethefirmmoreresilienttobadstatesoftheworldpreparednessactivities.
Ourthesisisthatbecauseofthepossibilityofcoordinationfailures,thereisapositiveexternalityinpreparingforbadtimes.Anexamplemakesthisconcrete.Supposethatanautomobilefirmhaslowpreparedness,i.e.ithashighleverageandlowcash.Thenintheeventofarecession,thefirmismorelikelytoneedtolayoffworkersandcutbackoninvestment.Thisharmsworkersandsuppliers,whointurnwillneedtocutbackontheirdemandsfromotherfirms.Thefirm'
scutbackscancontributetoachainreactionandtoageneralrecession.Suchachainreactioncouldinsteadstartwithashocktofinancialfirms.
Exante,theownersoftheautomobilefirmdonotliketheprospectthattheirfirmmayhavetocutbackonneededinvestment.Buttheyarenotconcernedaboutthefactthatshouldtheylayoffemployees,thoseemployeeswillcuttheirdemandsfortheproductsofotherfirms.Similarly,theownersoftheautofirmdonotcarethattheirsupplierswillbehurt,andthesuppliersoftheirsuppliers.Soinchoosingitsoptimallevelofpreparedness,theownersandmanagersoftheautofirmwillnottakeintoaccountthebenefitthatpreparednessconfersuponothersthroughouttheeconomy–thebenefitofmitigatingcoordinationfailures.Ourpurposehereistoexplorethepolicyimplicationsofthesepreparednessexternalities.
Regardlessofwhetherthereiscomplementarityorsubstitutabilityinthepreparednesschoicesofdifferentparties,itremainsthecasethattheincentivetoinvestinpreparednessis,fromasocialviewpoint,insufficient.Asarguedabove,apreparedpartydoesnotabsorbthefullbenefitofpreparedness,becausethepartydoesnotbearthefullcostofitscontributiontocoordinationfailure.
1.2Policyimplications
Wewillmainlyconsidertwoapplicationsofpreparednessexternalities,totaxpolicyandtoaccountingpolicy.Minimizingsystemicriskhasbeenakeyconcernoffinancialregulators[3].Regulatorsoftenchooseextremelycostlyexpostresponsestofinancialcrises[4].Giventhehighexpostcostsofbubblesandpanics,itisimportanttostepbackandthinkaboutwhetherexistingrulesofthegamecontributeexantetotheiroccurrence.Justasitisoftencheaperandmoreeffectivetopreventadiseasethantotreatit,exantepolicytoolstopreventtheformationofbubblesmaybemuchcheaperthanexposttreatments.
Wefocusonhowtaxesandaccountingpolicycanexacerbatesystemicrisk.Ourargumentwithrespecttotaxesfocusesonfinancialslackasameansofpreparingforbadtimes.Inversely,akeysourceofsystemicriskisleverage.Attheleveloftheindividualfirm,anoverhangofexcessivedebtcreatescostsoffinancialdistress.Thefirmisforcedtocutinvestment,andengageinrenegotiationwithcreditors.Ifafirm'
sstockpricedropsandithasanoverhangofdebt,itbecomeshardtoraisenewcapitaltocoverneededexpenditures.Thisadverselyaffectsitsemployeesandsuppliers.Afinancialfirmcutsbackonsupplyingcapitaltootherfirms.
Duringbadtimes,problemsofdebtoverhang,risk‐shifting,andrenegotiationbecomesevere,causingunderinvestment,andrisk‐shiftingbyindividualfirms.Fortheeconomy,owingtocreditlinkagesbetweenfirms,afinanciallydistressedfirm'
sdefaultcantriggerdistressofitslender,andtherebyinfectotherfirmsinturn.Similarly,defaultcancreatedistressforfirmsthathaveprovidedinsurancetoothercreditorsthroughinterestrateswaps.Chainsofcreditacrossfirms,thecomplexityofrisksharingarrangements,andintransparencyinthereportingofwhoholdsexactlywhatrisksandclaimsmakevaluationandrenegotiatingcapitalstructuredifficult[5].
Indiscussionsofsystemicrisk,financialcrises,andmacroeconomicfluctuations,taxpolicyhashadaverylowprofile.Similarly,discussionsoftaxpolicyseldomconsidertheeffectonpreparednessandsystemicrisk.Forexample,inanextensiveoverviewofwhatweknowaboutcorporatetaxationandpossiblewaystoreformit,Auerbachetal.(2008)devotelittleattentiontoleverage,anddonotdiscusstheeffectsoftaxpolicyoncoordinationfailureorsystemicrisk.
Wewillarguethatthisisamajor