旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx

上传人:b****2 文档编号:5776644 上传时间:2023-05-05 格式:DOCX 页数:8 大小:21.19KB
下载 相关 举报
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共8页
旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共8页
亲,该文档总共8页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx

《旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

旅店员工流失影响Word下载.docx

TimothyHinkin 

CornellHotel&

RestaurantAdministrationQuarterly 

August-Sept,2001

Weknowthatemployeeturnovercostsmoney.我们都知道员工流失很花钱的。

Here'

sonewaytoestimatethatcost.

这里有一种方式可以估计他的花销。

Manyhospitalitymanagersareconvincedthatexcessiveturnoverisacostlyphenomenon,butitisdifficulttodevelopspecificturnover-costnumbers.很多服务经理深信大量员工流失是一个花钱的事,但是很难给出一个具体的开支数字。

Thatisnottosaythatresearchershavenotattemptedtonaildownthecostofturnover,butthefactremainsthatspecificcostfigurescanbeelusive.那并不是说调查员们没有努力去敲定一个员工流失的开支,而是实际上留下的开支是无法预计的。

(1)Becauseturnovercostsarehardtocalculate,一是因为员工流失开销很难估计,itisequallydifficulttoassessthebottom-linefinancialvalueofturnover-reductionprograms.对于降低员工流失措施的财政预算,同样也很难估计。

Thematterofdeterminingacostofturnover(or,moretothepoint,thevalueofpreventingturnover)isalsocomplicatedbytheindustry'

sambivalencetowardthematter.企业对于人才流失的决定事宜(或者,更确切地说是阻止人才流失的所带来价值)犹豫不决,也使得事情变得更为复杂了。

Despitethedisruptionandcostofturnover,manymanagersstillviewemployeesasreplaceablecommodities-especiallyhourlyemployees.尽管员工流失会带来大量的开支和人员的分裂,很多经理还是把员工看成是可以替代的,特别是小时工。

The"

warmbody"

syndromeofhiringunselectivelytofillapositionremainsinplace,eventhoughtheresultsofthispracticecanhavedevastatingeffectsonbothinternalandexternalcustomers.毫无选择性地去雇佣一些精英填补空缺的这种病状还是存在的,即使这样做的后果会对国内和国外的客户产生不可挽回的影响。

Wehaveseentheindustrymakestridesinthisareainrecentyears,especiallygivenlowunemploymentandincreasedcompetitionforqualityemployees.我们也见过这个地方有一个工厂发展很快,员工流失少,竞争力很强。

Somehospitalityorganizationshavebeguntofocusonretainingtheiremployees.一些服务组织已经开始关注如何挽留员工了。

CompaniessuchasARAMARK,Morton'

sofChicago,andSouthwestAirlines,tonamejustthree,havedevelopedspecificprogramstoemphasizetheimportanceofemployeeretentionanddevelopment.一些公司已经制定了一些特别的项目来强调留住员工的重要性。

Thisarticleprovidesatooltohelpmanagersobjectivelyestimatethecostofturnover,sothattheycanmeasurethedollarbenefitsofemployee-retentionprogramsandcomparethosebenefitstotheprogramcosts.这篇文章提出了一个帮助经理们客观估计员工流失开支的解决办法,以便他们能衡量为了留住员工给出的津贴费以及这个项目的开支的利弊关系。

Researchershavebuiltacaseforthebenefitstobegainedfromemployeeretention.InarecentarticleHuselidexaminedasampleof968firmsfromawiderangeofindustriesandfoundastronglinkbetweenadecreaseinemployeeturnoverandanincreaseinsales,marketvalue,andprofitability.

(2)Similarly,Heskett,Sasser,andSchlesingerintheirworkontheservice-profitchaindemonstratedrelationshipsbetweenemployeeretentionandincreasedproductivityinawiderangeofindustries.(3)Examining76hotels,SimonsandMcLeanParksfoundthatemployeeturnoverwasacleardriverofhotelprofitability.(4)

TurnovercostsI.HinkinandTraceyidentifiedandexaminedmanyofthehiddencostsassociatedwithemployeeturnoverathotels.(5)Inthatwork,theauthorsinterviewedover40employeesandhuman-resourcesprofessionalsconnectedwithtwohotelcompaniesandusedtheinformationtodevelopacomputerprogramtocalculatethecostsassociatedwithavoluntarydepartureofasingleemployeeinavarietyofpositions.Thatmodelconsideredtheseparationcosts;

thecostsofrecruiting,selection,hiring;

andlostproductivity.Asanexample,thefoundthatforfront-deskassociatesthecostofindividualturnoverwasapproximately30percentoftheannualsalary.Forafrontdeskwith30employees,anhourlywageof$12.00,and50percentturnover,thetotalannualcostofturnoverforthatpositionwouldexceed$150,000.Basedonthisinformation,theyproposedthatincreasesinemployeewages(toencourageretention)mayironicallyreducepayrollcostsatmosthotels.

TurnovercostsII.Let'

slookattwoprimaryconcernsregardingtheresultslaidoutintheHinkinandTraceyarticle.First,manyofthecostsassociatedwithemployeeturnoveraredrawnfromthefixed-costpoolofsalaried-employeetime.Forexample,thehuman-resourcesmanagerwhospendsseveralhourseachdayinterviewingprospectiveemployeesissalariedandwouldbeonthepremisesanyway.Second,thoughtheoriginalworkdrewonmanyinformantsandsohasreasonablevalidity,manyofthespecifiedcostsderivefromproductivitylossesthataredifficulttoestimatereliably.Onecannotsay,forexample,thatanewemployeewillbeexactly50percentasproductiveastheemployeeheorshereplaces,andonecannotknowpreciselyhowlongitwilltaketogettoaprescribedlevelofcompetence.Whilethemodelprovidesvaluableinformation,HinkinandTracey'

sresearchfocusesonhiddencostsanddoesnotdirectlyexaminetherelationshipbetweenemployeeturnoverandoverallhotelprofitability.

Weseektofillthatgapbyofferinginthisarticleacomplementaryapproachtoestimatingturnovercosts.Weexamineoperationalandfinancialrecordsacrossalargesampleofhotels.Thecurrentworkexaminesactualfinancialperformanceandemployee-turnoverinformationat98hotelsduringthefirsthalfof1999.Wealsoexaminethepossibledifferencesinturnovereffectsfordifferentpricetiersofhotelsandtherelationshipbetweenhotelsizeandturnover.

ADifferentEstimate

Wedrewdatafrom105hotelsthroughouttheUnitedStatesaspartofalargerstudy.Thehotelsrangedfrom72to652rooms,employedbetween14and505employees,andrangedinADRfrom$46.73to$165.53.Wesecuredfinancialperformanceinformationaboutallbutoneofthehotels,andsixofthehotelsexperiencedincreasesordecreasesintotalpersonnelcountsgreaterthan50percentduringtheperiodstudied.Weexcludedthosesevenpropertiesfromfurtheranalysis,andanalyzedfullinformationon98hotels.Foreachhotelwecollectedthefollowinginformation:

thenumberofrooms,thenumberofemployees,theemployee-turnoverrate(combinedvoluntaryandinvoluntary),grossoperatingprofits(GOP),andADRfortheperiodbetweenJanuary1andJune30,1999.

WeanalyzedthedatausingacorrelationmatrixandcontinuousmoderatedlinearregressiontechniquesasdescribedbyAikenandWest.(6)Thiscombinationofapproachesallowsforexaminationofbothsimple,directeffects-inthiscase,therelationshipbetweenturnoverrateandGOP-andoftheextenttowhichtheexpenseofturnovervarieswithahotel'

spricepoint.

TurnoverDrivesOutProfits

Thecorrelationmatrix(Exhibit1)revealsinterestingrelationships.Itisclear,forexample,thatemployeeturnoverisstronglyassociatedwithdecreasedhotelprofits(r=-.46,p<

.01).Notealsothatemployeeturnoverissubstantiallyloweratlargeproperties(r=-.36,p<

.01)andatpropertieswithhighroomrates(r=-.48,p<

.01).Thosecorrelationscanbeillustratedbycomparingtheextremesinthesample.Hotelswithfewerthan150rooms(n=15),forexample,hadaveragesix-monthemployeeturnoverofroughly63percent.Hotelswith350ormorerooms(n=24)hadaveragesix-monthemployeeturnoverofroughly37percent.Lookingattheroom-rateextremes,hotelswithanADRbelow$60(n=15)hadanaveragesix-monthemployeeturnoverofroughly59percent.HotelswithanADRabove$100(n=14)hadanaveragesix-monthemployeeturnoverofroughly27percent.

Contingencymodel.Moderatedregressionisaformofanalysisthatexploreswhethertheimpactofapredictor(inthiscase,employeeturnover)onanoutcome(inthiscase,GOP)dependsonacontingency(inthiscase,ADR).Thatis,isemployeeturnovermorecostlyatluxuryhotelsthanateconomyhotels?

Examiningthiscontingencywillallowforamorepreciseestimateofthecostofturnoveratagivenhotel.ThefirststepintheanalysisistoadjustGOPtoaccountfortheeffectsofhotelsizeandADR.LargehotelsgenerallyhavearelativelyhighGOP,forinstance,andweshowthatlargehotelsalsotendtohaveloweremployeeturnoverascomparedtosmallerproperties.

Itwouldbeamistake,however,toattributealargehotel'

shighGOPstrictlytoloweremployeeturnover,giventhatlargehotelssimplyhavemoreroomstosellthandosmallerones.Tocorrectthisproblem,weusedstatisticstoholdconstanttheeffectsofahotel'

ssizeandADR.Essentially,weallowADRandhotelsizetoexplainasmuchofGOPastheycan,andthenleaveemployeeturnovertoexplainwhateverchangesremaininGOP.

TheanalysisinExhibit2showstheeffectofturnoveratthesample'

saverageADR,anditalsoshowsthatturnoverismorecostlyathigh-pricehotelsthanatmoderate-tierproperties.ThispointismadebythehighlysignificantinteractiontermthatlooksattheproductofemployeeturnoverandADR.ForeachdollarincreaseinADR,eachpercentagepointofemployeeturnovercostsanadditional$525inannualGOP.Thus,whileatypicalhotelinthesample(withanADRof$77)mightfaceacostof$7,550GOPperpercentagepointofemployeeturnover(representedbytheb-statisticinExhibit2),ahotelwithanADRof$125canbeestimatedtofaceacostoverfourtimesthatamount[$7,550+($525x48)=$32,750annualGOP]foreachpercentagepointofturnover.Conversely,theresultssuggestthatapropertywithanADRof$65wouldfacearelativelysmallannualcostforeachpointofturnover[$7,550-($525x12)=$1,250].

CostsandBenefits

Aswesaid,manylargehospitalitycompaniesaremakingconcertedeffortstocontrolemployeeturnover.Companiesmayenhancepay,benefits,orincentivesystems.Theymayundertaketotrainmanagersinhowbettertorespondtotheneedsexpressedbylineemployees.Companiesmaysystematicallysurveyemploye

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 工程科技 > 能源化工

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2