ChineseEnterpriseCultureOnthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesterncorporatecultureandthWord文档格式.docx
《ChineseEnterpriseCultureOnthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesterncorporatecultureandthWord文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ChineseEnterpriseCultureOnthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesterncorporatecultureandthWord文档格式.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
China-stylecorporateculture'
concept,becausemanagementhastheAmericansystem,JapaneseandChinese-style,thenthecorporateculturehascertainlymadetheAmericansystem,JapaneseandChinese-styleof.
First,thedefinitionofthedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternculture
China'
sintroductionof'
corporateculture'
isinthelateseventies,butnowtherearemanypeopleknowaboutthecorporatecultureisstillratherambiguous.
America'
scorporateculturefocusesonthetheoryofideas,aswellasinthemanagementofthisundertheguidanceproducedbythevarioussystems,processesandmanagementsystems,whileJapanisintheUnitedStatesonthebasisofinnovation,combinedwiththeUnitedStates'
corporateimagetheory,CI'
inthemanagementofbasedontheideaofanincreaseofMIcodeofconductforBI,thesetwofactors,thevisualstandardBI.SoforJapan,thecorporateimageandcorporateculture,andthereisnodifferenceinthenature,itfocusedonbusinessesandemployeestoformaunifiedstandard.Theyarefirst,andthenthereistheconceptofmanagementsystemforthedefinitionofcorporateculture,Japanistheresultofmanagementpracticesaftertherisetothetheoreticallevel,sotheirideaofsystemandmanagementsystemtomorecloselycombine.ButthecorporateimageintheUnitedStatesisnotdirectlylinkedwiththecorporateculture,itemphasizedthatthevisualdesign,whilethecorporatecultureisthemanagementissue,itstressedthatmanagementscience.Becauseofitscorporatecultureistheresultfirst,andthenrefinedtopromotethepractice,sothecorporateimageandmanagementculturedoesnotrequiredirectcontact.ThisisthecorporatecultureintheUnitedStatesandJapanhadtoknowthedifference.
InChina,wefirstpopularizedinJapan'
scorporatecultureisbasedonunderstandingofthescopeofthecorporateidentitysystem,CI,andthusfartherearestillmanyenterprisesdonotknowthecorporateimageandcorporateculture,therelationshipbetweenthecorporateimagethattheysimplyequivalenttoanenterpriseculture.Infact,China'
sstatusquoofcorporatecultureinsideandoutsidethetwo-tierskin,andmanycompaniesintocorporateidentitysystem,willtheconceptofcorporateimagemanagementsystemdirectlyequivalentconcept,buttheEnterpriseManagementconceptisstillapotentialmanagementsystem,buthavenotbeenfollowingtheupgradingandfinishingTherefore,understandingcorporatecultureisthecurrentcorporateretreatonthebasicconceptsofcorporateculture.Inaddition,thecontentofenterpriseculturewithChinesecharacteristicsistheideologicalandPoliticalwork,asourbusinesssystem,theoriginalreasonforaverylongtimeinthecorporatecultureandtheideologicalandpoliticalworkisbasicallysynonymous,butwebelievethattheideologicalandpoliticalworkisstate-ownedenterprisesgeneratedbythespecialcontextofamanagementculture,it'
sjustthecontextofChina'
sspecialpartofcorporateculture,ratherthanallthecorporateculturemorethanChinesecultureinitsentirety.WeknowthatChina'
scurrentformsofenterprisesinadditiontostate-ownedenterprises,thereareforeign-fundedenterprisesandprivateenterprises,forthem,theideologicalandpoliticalworkwouldnotbeequivalenttocorporateculture.Therefore,theChineseunderstandingofcorporatecultureisquiteconfusingatthisstage,thereareconsideredtobecorporateimage,thereareconsideredtobeideologicalandpoliticalwork,andevenconsideredtobeemployeesoftheentertainment.
Fromtheabovecanbeanalyzed,theUnitedStatesbelievesthecorporateculturefocusedonmanagementculture,Japanbelievesthatthecorporateculturefocusedontheimageofculture.Chinese-stylecorporateculturethatwhatshouldbethedefinition?
WebelievethattheChinese-stylecorporatecultureshouldbe'
philosophical-stylecorporateculture'
boththephilosophicalandcultural.Theso-calledphilosophy-stylecorporateculturereferstothecorporatephilosophyasthecenter,insideandoutsidetheenterprisetotransformasetofcontradictorywaysofthinking.Thisphilosophicalcultureischaracterizedby:
'
hardnesswithsoftness,dealtwithgently;
internallyandexternallywithinthemainouter'
.'
Hardnesswithsoftness,dealtwithgently'
managementsystemistorigidandflexiblecombinationofmanagementconceptsandtomanagementconcepttoguidemanagementsystem,whichisthemanagementculture;
internallyandexternallywithinthemainouter'
referstothemanagementcultureandimageofthecultureofthetimes,andtoguidethemanagementcultureoftheimageofculture.Canbeseen,Chinese-stylecorporateculturecombinestheU.S.andJapanesecorporateculturecorporatecultureadvantages,whileInnovationinatraditionalChineseculturalcharacteristicswithanewmodelofcorporateculture.
Second,thedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternmanagementthinking
TalkingaboutthedifferencesbetweenChineseandWesternculture,wemustfirstunderstandthedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternbusinessmanagementthinking,becausedifferencesincorporatecultureistomanagethethinkingbehindthedifferencesinmanagementthinkingisthecoreofcorporateculture.ThedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternmanagementthinkingtherearemanyaspects,butthemostessentialisthe'
logic'
and'
dialecticalthinking,'
thedifference.
Americansbelievethatlogicalthinking,whichemphasizestheunityoftheworld,non-contradictoryandschedulingneutral.Bythiswayofthinkingpeoplebelievethatapropositioncannotsimultaneouslyrightorwrong,orright,orwrong,nointermediate.Usuallywesaythattheyare'
either-or'
thinking.
Chinesepeopleemphasizethedialecticalthinking,whichcontainsthreeprinciples:
changetheory,thecontradictiontheoryandintheory.Changeonthechangingnatureofdeparturefromtheworld,thattheworldiseverchanging,thereisnoeternalrightandwrong;
Contradictionbelievesthatallthingsarecomposedofcontradictionsfromtheunityofopposites,thereisnocontradiction,nothingthemselves,andintheoryareembodiedinthedoctrineofthemean,thattoeverythingthereisamoderatereasonable.
Third,thedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternvaluesystem
DifferencesinthinkingintheWest,undertheinfluenceofWesternvaluesystemshavesignificantdifferences.Valuesisinuswhatisandwhatiswrong;
whatshouldandwhatshouldnotbeacriterion.Valuesystemingeneralincludesthebasicvalues,andthevalueofgoals,waysandrestraintmechanismstoimplementfouraspects.WewillclassifyandWesternvalues,valueisbasedon'
individualismandcollectivism'
thevalueofobjectiveisto'
materialismandspiritualism,'
implementationoftheapproachis'
scienceofMarxismandtheGerman-ism'
andrestraintmechanismis'
doctrineandtheruleofman,theruleoflawdoctrine'
hereweareinaccordancewiththisclassificationmethod,thedifferencebetweenChineseandWesternvaluesystemsareintroduced.
1,individualismandcollectivism
Westernersfortheindividualandcollectivethinkingisfocusedonthecollectivefromapersonalperspective,theythinkthatgroupismadeupofindividuals,sothefocusonpersonalprogress,emphasizestheroleofindividuals,ability,struggle,hardworkandsoon,sopersonalheroismisWesternvaluesisanimportantconstituentelement.Aslongastheopportunitytodemonstratetheirabilities,theAmericanswillbethefirsttofight,thechampionwiththerecordisalmostanAmericanword.AndChina'
swaysofthinkingemphasizecollectivism,usedtoanalyzetheindividualfromthecollective,individualbutcollectiveinanintegralpart.Undertheinfluenceofsuchthinking,'
gooddeedgoesunpunished,peopleareafraidafraidoffamouspigZhuang'
'
I'
mabrick,wheretheneedtomovethere,'
long-termguidingideologyoftheChinesepeople'
smanagementpractices,thusformingakindof'
alow-key,pragmatic'
culturalinclinations.Undertheinfluenceofsuchvalues,Westernersconcernedabouthowtheirownview,andtheChinesepeoplewereconcernedabouthowotherslook.
2,materialismandspiritualdoctrine
ForthematerialneedsoftheWesthasalwaysbeenconsideredjustified,thepursuitoftheinterestsofSocialDevelopmentneeds,butalsoamanifestationofpersonalvalues,sothevaluesofexcellencerecognizedbysocietystandards.Sothericharerespectedinthecommunity,thereisnoneedforcover.TheChinesepeoplealwaysbelievethattraders'
materialisticsense'
andthereforedonotadvocateemphasizedthatthematerialinterestsofpromotingaculturalfigures,emphasizingthepursuitofselfself-cultivationisusuallysoastoachievewithoutmestate,soabstinencecanbesaidthatakeyfeatureofChineseculture.'
Contentment'
'
notseeking'
activebuttheytrytoolittlewealthnotonlyan'
ideamakesthedevelopmentofChineseenterpriseslackalong-termideologicaldrivingforce.
3,Scientis