科斯企业的性质英文版.docx

上传人:b****3 文档编号:6712728 上传时间:2023-05-10 格式:DOCX 页数:15 大小:37.05KB
下载 相关 举报
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共15页
科斯企业的性质英文版.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共15页
亲,该文档总共15页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

科斯企业的性质英文版.docx

《科斯企业的性质英文版.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《科斯企业的性质英文版.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

科斯企业的性质英文版.docx

科斯企业的性质英文版

科斯:

企业的性质(英文版)

TheNatureoftheFirm(1937)

R.H.COASE

Economictheoryhassufferedinthepastfromafailuretostateclearlyitsassumption.Economistsinbuildingupatheoryhaveoftenomittedtoexaminethefoundationsonwhichitwaserected.Thisexaminationis,however,essentialnotonlytopreventthemisunderstandingandneedlescontroversywhicharisefromalackofknowledgeoftheassumptionsonwhichatheoryisbased,butalsobecauseoftheextremeimportanceforeconomicsofgoodjudgmentinchoosingbetweenrivalsetsofassumptions.Forinstance,itissuggestedthattheuseoftheword“firm”ineconomicsmaybedifferentfromtheuseofthetermbythe“plainman.”'Sincethereisapparentlyatrendineconomictheorytowardsstartinganalysiswiththeindividualfirmandnotwiththeindustry,2itisailthemorenecessarynotonlythatacleardefinitionoftheword"firm"shouldbegivenbutthatitsdifferencefromafirminthe"realworld,"ifitaists,shouldbemadeclear.Mrs.Robinsonhassaidthat"thetwoquestionstobeaskedofasetofassumptionsineconomicsare:

Aretheytractable?

and:

Dotheycorrespondwiththerealworld?

"3Though,asMrs.Robinsonpointsout,"Moreoftenonesetwillbemanageableandtheotherrealistic,"yettheremaywellbebranchesoftheorywhereassumptionsmaybebothmanageableandrealistic.Itishopedtoshowinthefollowingpaperthatadefinitionofafirmmaybeobtainedwhichisnotonlyrealisticinthatitcorrespondstowhatismeantbyafirmintherealworld,butistractablebytwoofthemostpowerfulinstrumentsofeconomicanalysisdevelopedbyMarshall,theideaofthemarginandthatofsubstitution,togethergivingtheideaofsubstitutionatthemargin.4Ourdefinitionmust,ofcourse,"relatetoformalrelationswhicharecapableofbeingconceivedexactly."5

1

Itisconvenientif,insearchingforadefinitionofafirm,wefirstconsidertheeconomicsystemasitisnormallytreatedbytheeconomist.LetusconsiderthedescriptionoftheeconomicsystemgivenbySirArthurSalter6.“Thenormaleconomicsystemworksitself.Foritscurrentoperationitisundernocentralcontrol,itneedsnocentralsurvey.Overthewholerangeofhumanactivityandhumanneed,supplyisadjustedtodemand,andproductiontoconsumption,byaprocessthatisautomatic,elasticandresponsive.”Aneconomistthinksoftheeconomicsystemasbeingco-ordinatedbythepricemechanismandsocietybecomesnotanorganizationbutanorganism.7Theeconomicsystem“worksitself.Thisdoesnotmeanthatthereisnoplanningbyindividuals.Theseexerciseforesightandchoosebetweenalternatives.ThisisnecessarilysoifthereistobeorderinthesystemButthistheoryassumesthatthedirectionofresourcesisdependentdirectlyonthepriceTheNatureoftheFirm(1937)R.H.COASE

2

mechanism.Indeed,itisoftenconsideredtobeanobjectiontoeconomicplanningthatitmerelytriestodowhatisalreadydonebythepricemechanism.8SirArthurSalter'sdescription,however,givesaveryincompletepictureofoureconomicsystem.Withinafirm,thedescriptiondoesnotfitatall.Forinstance,ineconomictheorywefindthattheallocationoffactorsofproductionbetweendifferentusesisdeterminedbythepricemechanism.ThepriceoffactorAbecomeshigherinXthaninY.Asaresult,AmovesfromYtoXuntilthedifferencebetweenthepricesinXandY,exceptif50farasitcompensatesforotherdifferentialadvantages,disappears.Yetintherealworld,wefindthattherearemanyareaswherethisdoesnotapply.IfaworkmanmovesfromdepartmentYtodepartmentX,hedoesnotgobecauseofachangeinrelativeprices,butbecauseheisorderedtodo50.Thosewhoobjecttoeconomicplanningonthegroundsthattheproblemissolvedbypricemovementscanbeansweredbypointingoutthatthereisplanningwithinoureconomicsystemwhichisquitedifferentfromtheindividualplanningmentionedaboveandwhichisakintowhatisnormallycalledeconomicplanning.Theexamplegivenaboveistypicalofalargesphereinourmodemeconomicsystem.0fcourse,thisfacthasnotbeenignoredbyeconomists.Marshallintroducesorganizationasafourthfactorofproduction;J.B.Clarkgivestheco-ordinatingfunctiontotheentrepreneur;ProfessorKnightintroducesmanagerswhoco-ordinate.AsD.H.Robertsonpointsout,wefind"islandsofconsciouspowerinthisoceanofunconsciousco-operationlikelumpsofbuttercoagulatinginapailofbuttermilk.”9Butinviewofthefactthatitisusuallyarguedthatco-ordinationwillbedonebythepricemechanism,whyissuchorganizationnecessary?

Whyaretherethese"islandsofconsciouspower"?

Outsidethefirm,pricemovementsdirectproduction,whichiscoordinatedthroughaseriesofexchangetransactionsonthemarket.Withinafirm,thesemarketstransactionsareeliminatedandinplaceofthecomplicatedmarketstructurewithexchangetransactionsissubstitutedtheentrepreneurco-ordinator,whodirectsproduction.10Itisclearthatthesearealternativemethodsofco-ordinatingproduction.Yet,havingregardtothefactthatifproductionisregulatedbypricemovements,productioncouldbecarriedonwithoutanyorganizationatall,wellmightweask,whyisthereanyorganization?

0fcourse,thedegreetowhichthepricemechanismissupersededvariesgreatly.Inadepartmentstore,theallocationofthedifferentsectionstothevariouslocationsinthebuildingmaybedonebythecontrollingauthorityoritmaybetheresultofcompetitivepricebiddingforspace.IntheLancashirecottonindustry,aweavercanrentpowerandshop-roomandcanobtainloomsandyarnoncredit.11

Thisco-ordinationofthevariousfactorsofproductionis,however,normallycarriedoutwithouttheinterventionofthepricemechanism.Asisevident,theamountof“vertical”integration,involvingasitdoesthesupersessionofthepricemechanism,variesgreatlyTheNatureoftheFirm(1937)R.H.COASE

3fromindustrytoindustryandfromfirmtofirm.Itcan,Ithink,beassumedthatthedistinguishingmarkofthefirmisthesupersessionofthepricemechanism.Itis,ofcourse,asProfessorRobbinspointsout,“relatedtoanoutsidenetworkofrelativepricesandcosts,”

12butitisimportanttodiscovertheexactnatureofthisrelationship.ThisdistinctionbetweentheallocationofresourcesinafirmandtheallocationintheeconomicsystemhasbeenveryvividlydescribedbyMr.MauriceDobbwhendiscussingAdamSmith'sconceptionofthecapitalist:

“Itbegantobeseenthattherewassomethingmoreimportantthantherelationsinsideeachfactoryorunitcaptainedbyanundertaker;thereweretherelationsoftheundertakerwiththerestoftheeconomicworldoutsidehisimmediatesphere...theundertakerbusieshimselfwiththedivisionoflabourinsideeachfirmandheplansandorganisesconsciously,”but“heisrelatedtothemuchlargereconomicspecialisation,ofwhichhehimselfismerelyonespecialisedunit.Here,heplayshispartasasingleceIlinalargerorganism,mainlyunconsciousofthewiderr?

lehefills.”13

Inviewofthefactthatwhileeconomiststreatthepricemechanismasacoordinatinginstrument,the?

alsoadmittheco-ordinatingfunctionofthe“entrepreneur,”itissurelyimportanttoenquirewhyco-ordinationistheworkofthepricemechanisminonecaseandoftheentrepreneurinanother.Thepurposeofthispaperistobridgewhatappearstobeagapineconomictheorybetweentheassumption(madeforsomepurposes)thatresourcesareallocatedbymeansofthepricemechanismandtheassumption(madeforotherpurposes)thatthisallocationisdependentontheentrepreneur-co-ordinator.Wehavetoexplainthebasisonwhich,inpractice,thischoicebetweenalternativesiseffected.14II

Ourtaskistoattempttodiscoverwhyafirmemergesatahinaspecializedexchangeeconomy.Thepricemechanism(consideredpurelyfromthesideofthedirectionofresources)mightbesupersedediftherelationshipwhichreplaceditwasdesiredforitsownsake.Thiswouldbethecase,forexample,ifsomepeoplepreferredtoworkunderthedirectionofsomeotherperson.Suchindividualswouldacceptlessinordertoworkundersomeone,andfirmswouldarisenaturallyfromthis.Butitwouldappearthatthiscannotbeaveryimportantreason,foritwouldratherseemthattheoppositetendencyisoperatingifonejudgesfromthestressnormallylaidontheadvantageof“beingone'sownmaster;”150fcourse,ifthedesirewasnottobecontrolledbuttocontrol,toexercisepoweroverothers,thenpeoplemightbewillingtogiveUpsomethinginordertodirectothers;thatis,theywouldbewillingtopayothersmorethantheycouldgetunderthepricemechanisminorderTheNatureoftheFirm(1937)R.H.COASE

4tobeabletodirectthem.Butthisimpliesthatthosewhodirectpayinordertobeabletodothisandarenotpaidtodirect,whichisclearlynottrueinthemajorityofcases.16Firmsmightalsoexistifpurchaserspreferredcommoditieswhichareproducedbyfirmstothosenot50produced;buteveninsphereswhereonewouldexpectsuchpreferences(iftheyexist)tobeofnegligibleimportance,firmsaretobefoundintherealworld.17Thereforetheremustbeotherelementsinvolved.

Themainreasonwhyitisprofitabletoestablishafirmwouldseemtobethatthereisacostofusingthepricemechanism.Themostobviouscostof“organizing”productionthroughthepricemechanismisthatofdiscoveringwhattherelevantpricesare.18Thiscostmaybereducedbutitwillnotbeeliminatedbytheemergenceofspecialistswhowillsellthisinformation.Thecostsofnegotiatingandconcludinga

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 农林牧渔 > 林学

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2