英语bp辩论Word文档格式.docx

英语bp辩论Word文档格式.docx

《英语bp辩论Word文档格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英语bp辩论Word文档格式.docx（6页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

medicinesandhealthproducts

advertisers

PMLO

DPMDLO

MGMO

GWOW

DPM:

（Openingremarks:

usingthestepsasshowninPPT）

Mr.speaker,MembersoftheHouse,theleaderofoppositiontodayhastoldusthatcooperationisnotbetterthancoopetitioninpromotingsocialadvancement.

Butwethinkthiswillnotworkwell.Weshould…

Inordertosupportourstance,todayIwillhaveoneextensionandoneargument.Firstly,Iwillprovetheworkabilityofourplan,andtheargumentcaresabout….

Butbeforethat,Iwillgivetworebuttals.

（Substantiation）

（I.Rebuttals）

（repairing-orientatedrebuttal）1…..

（refutation-orientatedrebuttal）2…..

（Extensions）

（Challengingtheburdenofproof）

（Thinkingofnewarguments）

（Conclusions）

Tosumup,todayIhavegiventworebuttals:

Allthosemadeourgovernmentsidebelievethat

DLO:

Mr.Speaker,membersoftheHouse,ladiesandgentlemen:

（Openingremarks）

AstheDeputyLeaderofOppositiontoday,Iwouldliketodividemyspeechintothreeparts:

firstIwouldliketogivetworebuttals,afterwardsIwouldliketogivemyargumentsApreviewoftheargumentsshouldbeverylistener-friendly.

andfinallymyconclusion.

（2rebuttals）

Herearemyarguments.

1….

2….

Toconclude,astheDLO,Ihaveclaimedthatmedia’ssupervisoryfunctioncannotbereplacedeasily,andIhaveexplainedwhythispolicy“banningmediacoverage”isunnecessaryandwhythegovernmentwoulddefinitelypayhighpriceifissuingtheban.没有总结第二个argument

Balancingtheadvantagesanddisadvantages,thishousebelievesthatweshouldnotbanmediacoverageofcelebrities’privacy.

GW:

GovernmentWhipSpeech

（Openingremarks-CommentonthePrincipleIssues）

Ladiesandgentlemen,Iregrettosaythatinthislong-lastingdebatewesawanoppositionwhooverlookedtheimportanceofcelebrities‘righttoprivacyandthenecessitiesofprotectingthisprivacy.Theyclaimedthatonceacelebritychosetostepoutintothepublicattention,heautomaticallyagreedtogiveuphisprivacyrighttofulfilltheso-called“publicduty”.Whichis,inotherwords,sinceacelebrityhasgainedsomuchattentionandmoneyfromhiscareer,heshouldthereforebewillingtosacrificehisrighttosatisfymediaandhisfellowcitizensinreturn.Firstly,wedonotthinkitisthecelebrities’publicdutytogiveuphisprivacyright.Rather,itisthecelebrity’sprivacythatismosteasilyharmedandneedtobeprotected.Secondly,webelievebyprotectingthisprivacywecanprotectmorepeoplefrompotentialharmandguidethesocietytowardsabettersocialvalue.Iwillprovethesetwopointsinmyfollowingspeech.

（Refutation）

1.Governmentshouldprovideweapons（allowmediasupervision）insteadoftaking（coverage）rightsaway?

Firstly,coveragerightdoesn’texistifitisaboutpersonalissues（privacy）.

Secondly,basedonthisclaim,wecanalsosafelydrawtoaconclusionthatgovernmentshouldcomeupwithpoliciesandlawsasweaponstoprotecttheprivacyrightofcelebrities,notneglectingitsdutyanddeprivethisrightfromthem.Giveacommentofthisargumentasaconclusion:

Sothankyou,memberofopposition,whatyousaidisexactlythesametoourmodel

2.Shouldacelebritypayforhisfamebygivingupprivacy?

No.Whateverhegotfromhiscareerhepaidforthemthroughhishardworkandself-decipline.Asfortheopposition’sconcernthatcelebritiesmayhidedirtylittlesecretsandthereforehavebadinfluenceonpublic,wehavealreadyprovedthatgovernmentwouldsupervisethemwithmoresolidandvalidpoliciesandlaws,andwebelieveonlythegovernmenthassuchauthoritytodoso.

（SummaryModel:

AHRP）

Thoughoutthisdebate,Iseemainlytwoclashes.

Clash1Doesthemediacoverageofcelebrities’privacydosuchharmthatitneedtobebanned?

（YES）

Opposition:

Thesecoverageshelptosupervisecelebrities,teachcitizensrightfromwrongandsendpositivemessagestothepublic.Warrantismissing.加上Theyputmorestressonthebenefitofmediacoverageofcelebrities’privacy.

Us:

Thesecoveragesharmthecelebritiesandtheirfamiliesandfriendsbyaffectingtheirnormaldailylives,sometimesevenarousingpersonalattacksandinsults.（ZGR）

Thesecoveragesharmthefans（esp.teenagerswholookeduptotheirmodels）bymisleadingthemtodothesamethingtheirmodelsdid（e.g.drugabuse）.

Thesecoveragesharmthewholesocietyforthemedia,underitsprofit-drivennature,mayformacompetitionofdisclosingcelebrities’privacy.Evenworse,toattractmoreattentaintheymaytryto“create”privacywhichisnottrue,causinggreaterchaosanddisputes.Warrantismissing:

加上Fromtheabovecontrast,itisquiteobviousthatmediacoverageofcelebrities’privacycan’tfulfillthedutyofsupervisioneffectivelyastheoppositionbenchwishes,butonthecontrary,itbringsaboutmoreharm.Sowe,governmentbench,winthenecessityclash.

Clash2Whoshouldbethesupervisorofthecelebrities,themediaorthegovernment?

Media>

Governmentthestate

Mediaposessesmorefactsandcandiscloseillegalaffairsmuchearlier.

Mediahelppeopletopursuethetruth.

Improvingthefunctoinofmediasavesmoreresourcesthanbanningitsfunction.

Media<

Government同上

Mediasupervisioncan’tbetotallydependedon.Theadvantagesofmediasupervisionisbasedonthepremisethatitreportstherightthingintherightway.However,itisdifficultformediatotakeanobjectiveviewinreportingbecausemediaismarket-orientedandhastoconsiderthetasteofitsaudience.

Itisgovernment同上

’sduty.Mediacansupervise,buttothegovernmentthisispartofitsdutythatitcan’tshifttosomeoneelseregardlessoftheexpanses.What’smore,onlygovernmenthasthestance,theauthorityandqualificationtocarryoutsuchpowerfulsupervisiontoregulatethecelbrities.（e.g.anticorruption）

Itisalsothegovernment’sdutytoensurethewell-beingofallcitizensbyprotectingcelebrities’rightandguidingaswellaseducatingnormalpeopletoformtherightvalues（respectingothers’privacyright,notdiggingintothem）.Toconclude,weprovethejustificationofourmodel,thatis,thestatehasthemoraldutytosupervisecelebrities.Wealsoprovetheeffectivenessofourmodel,thatis,thestatecandoabetterjobthanthemediainsupervisionsinceveryoftenmedia’ssupervisionisproblematicandviolatecelebrities’privacyright.

Ending.

OW

OppositionWhipSpeech

------Thishousewouldbanmedia

coverageofcelebritiesprivatelife

Ladiesandgentlemen,astheoppositionwhip,I’dliketobeginmysummaryspeechbypointingouttoday’smajorclash,firstly,Humanrightsandprivacyrighthavebeenthefocusingpointthroughoutthisdebate,andanotherclashingpointiswhetherthegovernmentstate，以区分governmentside/bench

shoulddenythesupervisionroleofthemediaoncelebrities’privatelife.

Thegovernmentsideraisedtheissueofhumanrightthatbysayingthat

privacyisoneofpeople’sbasicrights,thusitshouldbeprotect,andespeciallysowhenitcomestocelebritieswhoismorelikelyandvulnerableto?

语言错误

privacyviolation,butthere’sonemajorflawhere,almostallofthegovernmentside’sargumentsarebasedonthepresumptionthatcelebritieswantcompleteprotectionoftheirprivacy,butthatissimplynottrue,causebecause.Debateisagenrebetweenwrittenlanguageandorallanguage.Wecannotuseveryinformalwords.

everyoneknowsthatatthebeginningstageofacelebrities’career,alltheyeverwantedismoremediaexposure,andmoreoftenthannot,evenaftertheygainedfame,theystillwouldlovetodeliberatelymakesomefussabouttheirprivatelifeinordertocatchthepublic’seyesandattention,ifthecelebritiesthemselvesdonotevenwanttobeprotected,whogivesthegovernmenttherighttoWhyshouldthestate

ignoretheirpersonalwillandimposeitsowninterpretationonthem.

Andspeakingofhumanrights,thegovernmentsideonlyseesonesideofthestory,whichisonlyseeingtheproblemofmediacoverageofcelebrities’privacyfromthecelebrities’pointofstand,butjustasourleaderofoppositionhaspointedoutcelebritiesaretheoneswithmostsocialattractionsandinfluenceandtheirbehaviorandactionwilldefinitelyplayanimportantroleinconductingthepublic,thesadtruthisthegovernmentcompletelyoverlookedthehumanrightsofthepublicwithoutevensufficientlysupportingtheirone-sidestory.

Theothersideofthestoryisthepublic’srightofinformationasourmemberofoppositionhaspointedout.Whatcelebritiesdonotwantthemediatoexposeareusuallybadthingsthey’vedonethatonceexposedwouldruintheircareerandpublicfigureimage

butwithoutknowingwhatkindofpersontheyreallyare,thepublicseethemasrolemodels,theydevotetimeandmoneytofollowtheyidols,bytime,ImeanthetimetheydevotedtowatchthecelebritiesonTVandInternet,thetimetheyusedtofollowedthemandattendtheirconcernsandalsotimetheyspenttalkingabouttheiridolswithfriendsandcolleagues,bymoney,Imeanthemoneytheyspentonbuying