Analysis of the property rights behavior theory and its practical value in Germany China and France文档格式.docx
《Analysis of the property rights behavior theory and its practical value in Germany China and France文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Analysis of the property rights behavior theory and its practical value in Germany China and France文档格式.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
TheBasicLawoftheCivilCodeasamarketeconomy,theBasicLaw,aswellasconfirmationoftherightsandremediesofbasiclegalrightsofcivilsociety,anditsimportanceisself-evident.,Originatedasacivillaw,Germancivillawbroadimpactworldwide.Italy,Spain,Portugal,AustriaandSwitzerland,Japan,andoftheRepublicofChina(nowthelawsofTaiwanbelongstothecivillawthescopeofChinasincethelateQingDynastyrestructuring,followingbyGermany,ChinaandFrancehasmorethanahundredyearsinGermany,ChinaandFrancemanyoftheconceptsandsystemsofdirectreference,sothatourcountryinashortperiodoftimetoformamoreperfectandabletoadapttothelawsofourcurrenteconomicsystem.behaviorasoneofthetraditionalcivillawtheoryofpropertyrightstheory,Chinalegislationhavefailedtoholdreservationsaboutwhy?
RealRightBehaviourinfacttheactuallifeofthepeopleintheendwhat?
Behavioraltheoryofpropertyrightsincivillaw(apropertyrightstheoryoftheoriginofthebehaviorofthebehaviorofrealrightbeganintheGermancommonlawduringtheordinaryLaw.19century,itsfounder,therepresentativesoftheGermanscholarofthehistoricalschooloflawSavignySavignytheinitialtheoryaboutthebehaviorofrealright.behaviorofthingconceptwasfirstproposedbySavignyin1840&
lt;
&
theModernRomanlawsystem&
gt;
bookpublishedinlecturing,butSavignyintroducedthebehaviorofthingconcept,hasnotclearlydefineditsmeaning.&
draftersoftheGermanCivilCode&
Althoughtheuseofthetheoryofthebehaviorofrealright,“Propertythetermsofthecontract”andhadusedinthefirstdraft,butlaterconsideredisnotpreciseenough,andthenswitchtothe“Propertyconsensualstilldivergentviewsontheconceptofpropertyrights,domesticdoctrineeffectthatpurposeelementsandcontent,whichcontentmoreconvincingthatthe”materialtherightbehaviorforasetofpropertyrights,transferdirectlytothecontentsofthelegalacts.“①regardlessofhowdisputescanbereachedbyconsensusthepropertychangesdesirableforthebasicelementsofthebehaviorofthing.includingpropertyRealRightBehaviourtherighttoindependenceofthebehavior,thebehaviorofthingUncausationwellthepropertychangesformalismprinciple.
Independenceoftheindependenceofthebehaviorofthing(bbehaviorofthing,thatis,thebehaviorofthing,“theprincipleofdistinction,somescholarshavealsobecomethe”separationprinciple“GermanscholarSavignyclaimsabouttheindependenceofthebehaviorofrealrightbyobservingpedestrianalmstobeggarsandwhensomeoneagifttothebeggaracoin,thegoodcauseanddeliveryoccursimultaneously.Atthispoint,therearenootherfactsinadditiontothetransferofownershipbetweenapersonandabeggar,thereisneitherthepreviouscontract,andthereisnoanycreditor-debtorrelationship.purely,theonlyexistingdefactodeliveryeveniftheownershipistransferred.collectedforthetransferofownershipisnotnecessarydebtcontract,deliveryexpressownershipsowiththeconsensual,isarealcontract,apropertylawonpropertyrightscontract.advocatedebtcontractandpropertyrightsofcontractaretwodifferentlegalacts.changesinrealright,mustrelyonbehavioroutsidethedebtcontractdirectrealrightchangesforthepurposeoflegalacts,toacontractforthesaleofpropertyrightsbehavior.claimstheeffectivenessofthecontractproducedonlypartiesentitledtothedebtburdenoftheeffectivenessofthedebt,isnotdirectlyattributabletotheeffectivenessofthepropertychanges.,forexamplecivilsubjectthetwosidesreachedacontractforthesale,producedonlyonebenefitofthesubjectmatterbythecontractandtheotherpartytopaythepriceofgold(thevalidityoftheprice,withouttheriskoftheeffectivenessofthetransferofownershipofthesubjectmatter,andthepriceofgoldtothesubjectmatterandthetransferofownershipoccurredtheeffectivenessof,thepartiesshouldalsodefineacompletelyindependentpropertycontractseparately,thecontentsofthisrealrightcontractforbothsidesthemaintransfertheownershipofthesubjectmatterandthepriceofgold.Atthispoint,therealrightcontractclaimsandcontractcompletelyseparate.postedonfreepapersDownloadCenter
(threeactswithoutduetothesexualbehaviorofthingnobecauseofsexualbehaviorofthing“abstractprinciples”.SavignyPropertybehaviorshouldtakenoPropertybehaviorisnotacreditorbehavioraftertheestablishmentofthebehaviorofrealright,regardlessofthereasonforthedebtofitsexistenceinvalidorrevoked,willnotaffectthevalidityofthebehaviorofthing.,suchasasalescontract,apartytodeliverthesubjectmattertheotherpartytopaythepriceofgold,creditordesirabledefectiveorthecontentsofthecontractinviolationofthelawortheprincipleofpublicorderandgoodmoralstobeconfirmedinvalidorrevokedandshallnotaffectthevalidityofthepropertychanges,isstillvalid.lossofownershipofthesellernottotheoriginalrequesttherighttorequestthebuyertoreturntheoriginalreturn,butonlytorequestthereturnofunjustenrichmentrules,becausethebehavioroftheirpropertyrightswithoutduethepremiseofthetheory,atthistimethebuyerisstillentitledtotheownershipofthesubjectmatter.materialrightsbehaviorwithoutthesamestrainoftheindependenceofthesexualbehaviorofthing.theformalistprinciplesAsforthebehaviorofthing(itcanalsobeunderstoodastheinitialprinciplesofthePublicCredibilityPrinciple,chatteltobedeliveredtothetransferoftheeffectiveelementsofrealestateastherighttoregisterchangesinentryintoforceoftheelements.lawshallclearlydefined,andalsomoreeasilyapplicableinpractice,sothisproblemisnottostarton.
Second,civillawbehavioroftheindependenceofthebehaviorofthingandnolegislationandpracticeSavignyandotherminingpropertyrightstheoryscholarsabstracttheoryofthebehaviorofrealright,SavignyisinitiallyintheinterpretationofRomanlawformalismlegislativeprocess.Savignyhistoricalresearchmethods,lookingfortheruleoflawthroughhistorytraceablebondingtheory,Germany,ChinaandFrancehasalwaysbeentheconceptprecise,logicalandabstracttheoryofcharacteristicsknown,butpropertyrightsactsofindependenceandnotheoryishighlyabstract.&
&
929oftheGermanCivilCode[thedesirabledelivery]provides:
“transferofpropertyownershipbytheowneritwasdeliveredtotheassignee,andThetransferofownershipwasestablishedbythetwosidesdispute.assigneehaspossessionoftheobjects,onlydesirabletotransferownership.&
GermanCivilCode&
873[madeundertheagreementandregistration]provides:
“(1transferoflandownership,issettolandrightsaswellasthetransferofsuchrightsortosetotherrightsofsuchrights,theneedfortherightsofmanandtherelativeagreementontherighttochangeandshouldbetherighttochangetheregistrationinthelandregister,lawexceptasotherwisespecified.(2priortoregistration,thepartiesonlyinthemeaningthatthenotarypublic,ortotheLandRegistrationBureauorpresentingthemeaningofthat,ortherightpersonhasbeeninlinewith&
landregistrationbookundertheAct&
registrationpermitisdeliveredwhentherelativeisaffectedbytheconstraintsoftheagreement.“&
Section877providesthat,onthelandrightschangesarealsoapplicableinthefirst873throughthe&
specificprovisionsoftheexpedition,canclearlyseetheGermancivillawlegislationtotakethetheoryofthebehaviorofrealright.
Civillegislationaimstostrikeabalancebetweentradeorderandtheprotectionofcivilrights,bothtomaximizeefficiency.Civillawisnotonlytoprotectthetradingorder,onlyconcernedwiththecertaintyofthetransactionandtheeffectivenessoftheneglectoftherightsofthetransactionsubjectnotonlypursuecivilsubject’sinnertruemeaningofaseriousbreachandthechaosoftheciviltransactionorderinefficientGermany,ChinaandFrancefortheindependenceofthebehaviorofthingandnotheoryadoptionofthelegislative,judicialpracticeinthedisadvantagescannotbeignored.Civiltradingactivitiesoffairnessandjustice,therightsoftherightsholderscannotreallybeprotected,andseriousdamagetotheinterestsofthesellertothecontract,forexample,thethecivilofbothpartiesinthedeliveryofthesubjectmatterandtopaythepriceofgold,foundthesaleandpurchaseagreementisnotestablishedinvalidatedorcanceled,thistimeduetothebehaviorofthingwithout,shallnotaffectthevalidityofthebehaviorofthing,becauseoftheprinciplethebuyerstillobtainownershipoftheobject,thesellercanonlyrequestthereturnofunjustenrichmentrules(Asmentionedbeforetheconsequencestothesellerbythepeopleoftheownershiptothecreditors,theirrightsbyownershiptocreditors,declineintheeffectivenessoftherightsoftheseller’srightscannotbefullyprotectedandevenseveredamageto,thefollowingpracticemayappearsanalyzethesituation:
First,ifthebuyerofthesubjectmatterhasbeenresold,evenifthethirdpartyismaliciousabletoobtainownership,thesellerandthethirdpersoncanno