格莱斯合作原则理论指导下的《生活大爆炸》言语幽默研究英语论文Word文档格式.docx
《格莱斯合作原则理论指导下的《生活大爆炸》言语幽默研究英语论文Word文档格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《格莱斯合作原则理论指导下的《生活大爆炸》言语幽默研究英语论文Word文档格式.docx（24页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。
本论文的研究目标是探讨《生活大爆炸》中，违背合作原则产生的幽默。
其主要任务是通过分析这些幽默产生的原因帮助观众更好的理解幽默并培养幽默感。
2、论文（设计）的主要内容
本论文分为四章，第一章介绍进行该研究的原因、合作原则和《生活大爆炸》，第二章文献综述，第三章对《生活大爆炸》中违背合作原则产生的幽默案例。
最后一章是对本论文的总结。
3、论文（设计）的基础条件及研究路线
本论文的基础条件是不同的学者对《生活大爆炸》中产生的幽默从不同角度进行研究。
研究路线是对《生活大爆炸》中违背合作原则产生的幽默的目的进行阐述，并将其分别应用在日常生活中和之后幽默情景剧的台词设计中。
4、主要参考文献
Attardo,Salvatore.1994.LinguisticTheoriesofHumor.
NewYork:
MoutondeGruyter.
Chiaro,Delia.1992.ThelanguageofJokes:
AnalyzingVerbalPlay
LondonandNewYork:
Routledge.
Grice,H.P.1975.LogicandConversation.NewYork:
AcademicPress.
何兆熊，1989，《语用学概要》，上海：
上海外语教育出版社。
胡壮麟，2006，《语言学教程》，北京：
北京大学出版社。
5、计划进度
阶段
起止日期
1
确定初步论文题目
3月16日前
2
与导师见面，确定大致范围，填开题报告和任务书，导师签字
3月16日-3月23日
3
提交论文提纲
3月23日-3月30日
4
交初稿和文献综述
3月30日-4月20日
5
交终稿和评议书
5月8日前
指导教师：
XX年月日
教研室主任：
年月
注：
一式三份，学院（系）、指导教师、学生各一份
XXXX大学本科生毕业论文（设计）开题报告书
XXX学院英语教育专业XXX届
学生
姓名
XXX
论文（设计）题目
格莱斯合作原则理论指导下的《生活大爆炸》言语幽默研究
指导
教师
XX
专业
职称
所属教研室
英语基础教研室
研究方向
语言学
课题论证：
从违背格莱斯合作原则等方面论证违背合作原则在《生活大爆炸》中产生的幽默及其应用。
方案设计：
第一章介绍研究该论题的原因、合作原则和《生活大爆炸》，
第二章文献综述，
第三章对《生活大爆炸》中违背合作原则产生的幽默进行个例研究，
第四章对本论文进行总结。
进度计划：
3月16日前确定初步论文题目
3月23日前写开题报告、任务书
3月30日前提交论文提纲
4月20日前提交初稿和文献综述
5月8日前交终稿和评议书
指导教师意见：
指导教师签名：
年月日
教研室意见：
教研室主任签名：
XXXX大学本科生毕业论文（设计）文献综述
LiteratureReview
Thenotion“context”hasalonghistory.Differentlinguistshavedifferentunderstandingsaboutit.Contextonlyreferstotheneighboringsounds,words,orphrasesinSaussure’smodernlinguistics.Inhis1923Theproblemofmeaninginprimitivelanguages,Malinowskifirstusedthenotion“languagecontext”.Inhisopinion,languageisamodeofactionotherthanasymbolofthought.Thefunctionoflanguageistoorganizehuman’scommonaction.Malinowskiarguesthattheutterancesitselfbecomesonlyintelligiblewhenitisplacedwithinitscontextofsituation.Accordingtohim,thereisnowaytocategorizethemeaningofutterancesorthebasisofinternalconsiderationsoflanguagealone,andthemeaningofitsfunctionsintheparticularsituation,withreferencetothegivenculture（Huzhuanglin,1988:
35）.Thereisnodoubtthatthemeaningoflanguageissituationandculture.However,italsoresidesintherelationtothelinguisticcontext.Linguisticcontextherereferstotheinternalconsiderationoflanguage.Linguisticcontextcannotentirelytaketheplaceofphysicalandculturalcontexts,butitoftenhelpsinunderstandingtheparticularmeaningofthewords,phrasesetc.Utterancesarealsoneverdetachedfromthelinguisticcontext.
Basedonthesetheories,Firthformsanddevelopshisowncontexttheory.Firthbelievesthatcontexthasdifferentlevelsandthatthe“soundcontext”isthemostfundamentaloneinthecontextsystemandthereisnolowercontextuallevel.Firthdeniesthatthemeaningofalanguagecomesfromthelanguageitself.Onthecontrary,hethinksthat“eachwordwhenusedinanewcontextisanewword”（Firth,1957:
190）.Firthviewsthatacontextofsituationforlinguisticworkbringsintoarelationofthefollowingcategories:
A.therelevantfeaturesofparticipant:
persons,personalities.（i）theverbalactionoftheparticipants;
（ii）thenon-verbalactionoftheparticipants;
B.therelevantobjects;
C.theeffectoftheverbalaction.Heclaimsthatthemeaningofthelanguageshouldbestudiedthroughahierarchyofcontextsinthesensethatmeaningmaybedefinedastherelationshipbetweenanelementofanylevelanditscontextonthatlevel:
（i）therelationshipofeachphonemetoitsphoneticcontext;
（ii）therelationshipofeachlexicalitemtotheothersinthesentences;
（iii）themorphologicalrelationsofeachword;
（iv）thesentencetypeofwhichthegivensentenceisanexample;
（v）therelationshipofthesentencetoitscontextofsituation.
BothMalinowskiandFirthregardlanguageasasocialprocessandawayofliving.Theybothchoosetheactuallanguageusedinacertaincontextastheirresearchingobjects.AnotherlinguistwhohasmadegreatcontributionstolinguisticsisHalliday.HereceivesanddevelopsFirth’stwobasictheories:
“contextofsituation”and“system”.Hethinksthatlanguageisaformofdoing,notaformofknowing.Inhisopinion,languageonlydiffersinlinguisticbehaviorpotentialandactuallinguisticbehavior.Languageistheproductofsocialprocess（Halliday,1978:
preface）,anditisnotakindofknowledgeorcompetence.Differentwiththetraditionalviewthatcontextactsonlyasabackground,Hallidaytreatscontextasimportantlyaslanguage.Contextandlanguageaffecteachother.Contextsdeterminethewaysoflanguageexpressionswhereasspecificlanguageexpressions’methodscreatecertaincontexts.Halliday’sanothercontributiontolinguisticsisthedevelopmentofthenotion“register”.Byvirtueofitsuse,variouslanguagescanbedistinguished.Languagevariesasitsfunctionvaries;
itdiffersindifferentsituations.Accordingtohim,registerinvolveswhatfeaturesofcontextdeterminethechoiceoflanguageintheparticularcontextanditcanbeclassifiedintermsoffieldofdiscourse,tenorofdiscourse,andmodeofdiscourse.Thesethreedimensionsofclassificationcollectivelydefinethecontextofadiscourse.
AfterHalliday,anothergreatlinguistneedstobementionedisHymes.HeisanAmericansocialistandclassifiesthecontextintoeightcomponents:
setting;
participant;
ends;
artcharacteristics;
key;
instrumentalities;
normofinteractionandofinterpretation;
genres.Heanalysescontextandlanguagetogetherotherthantreatingthemasrelatedopposites.Hebelievesthatthereisnolanguagethatcanexistwithoutcontextandnocontextthathasnothingtodowithlanguage.HisnotionofcontexthassomesimilaritieswiththatofHalliday.Itisconcernedwithwhatdeterminestheappropriatenessoftheutterancesintheparticularcontext,justashimselfsays,“Inexpectingtofindascientifictheoryofsuchinteractionoflanguageandsocialsetting,oneineffectexpectstheorybasedwhereandwhen,forwhatpurposeandwithsubjecttowhatnormsofinteractionandofinterpretation;
asinstancesofwhatspeechactsandgenresofspeaking?
Howdocommunityandpersonalbeliefs,valuesandpracticesimpingeupontheuseoflanguage?
”（Hymes,1967:
20-25）
Somelinguistsdescribecontextastheknowledgeheldbylanguageusersandthinkthatitisanimportantpartofpeople’scommunicativecompetence.Lyonsisoneofthem.Helistssixkindsofknowledgeexemplifythecomponentsofcontextasthefollowing:
（i）eachoftheparticipantsmustknowhisroleandstatus.（ii）theparticipantsmustknowwheretheyareinspaceandtime.（iii）theparticipantsmustbeabletorecognizethesituationintermsofitsdegreeofformality.（iv）theparticipantsmustknowwhatmediumisappropriatetothesituation.（v）theparticipantsmustknowhowtomaketheirutterancesappropriatetothesubjectmatter.（vi）theparticipantsmustknowhowtomaketheirutterancesappropriatetotheprovinceordomainthesituationbelongingto（Lyons,1997:
574-585）.
Inthisthesis,contextisclassifiedasintra-linguisticcontextandextra-linguisticcontext.Intra-linguisticcontextreferstotherelevanttextsbasedonwhichacertainexpressioncanbeusedtoexpressacertainmeaningincommunication.Itcontainswordsfactors（words,phrases,sentences,paragraphsandstyles）andsoundsfactors.Extra-linguisticcontextreferstotheobjectiveandsubjectiveenvironmentbasedonwhichacertainmeaninggetsitsbestexpressionincommunication.Itincludesdominantfactors,suchasplaces,times,participants,naturalenvironments,etc.andrecessivefactors,suchaspolitics,economics,cultures,customs,conventions,etc.Inotherwords,intra-linguisticcontextfocusesonthefactorswithinthelanguageusedincommunicationwhileextra-linguisticcontextconcernsabouttheenvironmentinwhichthecommunicationtakesplace.
本科生毕业论文
题目:
作者姓名：
XXX
指导教师：
XX
所在学院：
XXX学院
专业：
英语教育
班级：
XXX级X班
完成日期2013年5月8日
OnVerbalHumorinBigBangTheoryundertheTheoreticalFrameworkofGrice’sCooperativePrinciple
BY
Prof.XX,Tutor
AThesisSubmittedtoDepartmentofEnglish
LanguageandLiteratureinPartial
Fulfillmentofthe
RequirementsfortheDegreeofB.A.inEnglish
AtXXXXUniversity
May8th,2013
Abstract
Humor，astheobbligatomeansofdailycommunication,hasattractedmuchattentionfromacademiaforalongtime.Lifewithouthumoristediousandboring;
Peoplewithouthumorarerigidandunpopular.Therefore,inordertohaveabettercommunicationwithothers,peoplehavetobuildthesenseofhumor.Inthisway,he/shecanimprovehis/herpersonalcharisma.Humorhelpsusliveinharmonywithothers.Itisunavoidabletohavemisunderstandingandtensionwithothersduringworkandstudy.Buthumorcaneasetheseproblemsquickerthanangrywordsorquarrels.Withityoucanalwayskeepongoodtermswithothers.
ThispaperanalyzesthehumorgeneratedbyviolationofCooperativePrinciple,usingBigBangTheoryasacorpus.TheaimofthispaperistodiscoverhowthehumorisgeneratedbytheviolationoftheCooperativePrinciple.Theauthordownloadedthevideoandsubtitlefirstly,basedonthebackgroundlaughter,analyzedthelanguagehumorsinthisTVseries.
ThispapertestsandverifiestheemergingofhumorbyviolatingtheCooperativePrinciple.TheauthorhopesthatthisdiscoverycanhelpmorepeopleunderstandandappreciatethehumorinBig
升级会员 