张明楷刑法的基本立场Zhang Mingkaicriminal laws basicWord文档格式.docx
《张明楷刑法的基本立场Zhang Mingkaicriminal laws basicWord文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《张明楷刑法的基本立场Zhang Mingkaicriminal laws basicWord文档格式.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
Onthisbasis,thepaperanalyzesthetheoreticalstatusofChinesecriminallaw,anddrawstheconclusion:
whetherincriminaltheoryorpenalty
Ontheside,bothtothenewcriminallawperspectivedominates.Thesecondchapterthroughtotheoldandnewincrime
Thispapermakesadetailedreviewofthearguments(objectivismandsubjectivism),andholdsthatthecurrentcriminallawinChinaisnowunderway
Inclinedtoobjectivismcriminallaw,andenumeratedindetailthebenefitsofthistilt.Thethirdchapterdiscussesconcretely
Thetwotendenciesintheinterpretationofconstitutiveelementsofcrimeincivillawcountriesarediscussed,namely,form
Theexplanationtheoryandthesubstantialexplanationtheoryindicatethattheauthoragreeswiththetheoryofsubstantialexplanation,andthinksthecrimeinourcountry
Thesystemofconstitutiondeterminesthatourcountrymustadoptthesubstantialexplanationtheory.Thefourthchapterdiscussestherootofillegality
Accordingtothe.Theauthorprobesintotheexistenceofillegalityintheforeigncriminallaw
Afterthetheoryofvalueandtheresultofnonvalue,itexpressestheviewthatresultintheresultofnonvalue,andthinksthatourcountry
Thepresentcriminallawadoptsthepositionofresultnonvaluetheory.ThefifthchapteristhebestembodimentofvarioustheoriesinCriminalJurisprudence
Throughtheconcreteanalysisofthetheoryofattemptedoffense,theauthorholdsthatthetheoryofcriminallawshouldbebasedonthesubstantiveview,thatis,theinfringementoflegalinterests
Thedefinitionof"
perpetratingact"
andthedeterminationof"
starting"
abandoningformalismandsubjectivism.Thesixthchaptercomments
Thispaperexpoundsthedebateonthecommontheoryofcriminalcommonactionandthetheoryofcrime,andadvocatesthetheoryofcommoncrime.Theseventhchapterstudiesaccomplicefrom
Attributeandthetheoryofindependenceofaccomplice,criticizethedualityofabettorandthetheoryofinstigatorindependence.Eighthchapters
Thebasicconceptofpunishmentisdiscussed,thatis,thelegitimatebasisofpenalty,theprincipleofsentencingandthedegreeofpenalty.
Thebasicconceptofthebookcanberoughlysummarizedasfollows:
Thefirstisobjectivism'
scriminaltheorystandpoint.Theexpressionofthispositionismainlythroughtheinterpretationofthecurrentpunishment
Theamendmentofseveralarticlesintheoldcriminallawcanbeinterpretedreasonablyfromthestandpointofobjectivism
Embodied.Afterthat,theauthorcriticizesthedefectsoftheoldcriminallawwhichisinclinedtosubjectivism,
Inthedescriptionofthecriminallawwhichisinclinedtoobjectivism,theattitudeofthecurrentcriminallawishighlypraised,whichexpressesitsgreatsignificance
Thestandpointofcriminaljurisprudence,whichemphasizesobjectivism,andembarksfromthisstandpoint,onthetheoryandpracticeofcriminallawinourcountry
Thesubjectivismofcriminallawinthepracticeofjudgmenthasbeencriticallydiscussed.Inaddition,thebookisrelevant
Theanalysisofattemptedoffenseandaccompliceisbasicallybasedonthestandpointofobjectivismcriminallaw
Rowanalysis.
ZhangMingkai:
the"
field"
ofthecriminallaw
Indeed,inthecognizanceofthecrime,shouldwevaluetheobjectivefactororthesubjectivefactor?
Theknottyproblemsincriminaljurisprudence.Frommoderncriminallawtotheprincipleoflegallyprescribedpunishmentforaspecifiedcrime,theprincipleofresponsibilityandbehavior
Thebasicstandpointoftheprinciple,ofcourse,shouldundoubtedlyconsidertheobjectivityoftheobjectiveelements
Solution.However,insistingonobjectivismisnotasloganorputtingforwardaviewtosolveit
Problemsolving.Becausethehistoricalviewofobjectivismorsubjectivismisnotcomplete,penetrating
Thetaillandadvocatesacertainfactor,andoftenintentionallyorunintentionally,withavarietyofcleverpackaging,willbeobjectiveandsubjective
Theelementsareentangledtogetherandappearinanimpartial,comprehensiveandimpartialmanner,therefore,intherealisticcriminallaw
Inspiteofthecautiousattitudetowardssubjectivismincriminallaw,thestudyofthesametime,however,hasbeencarriedoutatthesametime
Ontheanalysisofmanyproblems,
Butinadvertentlystoodonthepositionofsubjectivismincriminallaw.Mostclassic
TherepresentationofthetypeisthecriminaltheorystandpointthatthesubjectiveandobjectiveviewisconsistentwiththetheoryofcriminallawinChina
Isinlinewiththepracticalattitude,whilesittingonthefencebetweenaccordingtotheneedofsubjectivismandobjectivismstandpoint.
Solution.InviewofthepresentsituationofthestudyofcriminallawinChina,thispaperputsforwardtheviewofcriminaltheoryofobjectivismattheendofbigotry
ToimprovethetheoryandpracticeofthecriminallawpragmatisminChina'
scriminallaw
However,ithasitspositivemeaning.
Secondly,thetheoryofillegalityoftheresultnonvaluetheory.Asaresult,thetheoryofnonvalueandthetheoryofpricelessactisthecontinent
Howtoanalyzetheillegalityofbehaviorconcretelyinlegalsystemcountries,thatis,theso-calledsocialharmincriminallawofourcountry
Theessentialproblemofsex,ananalyticalmethodproposed.Accordingtothetheoryofpricelessvalueofbehavior,thebasisofillegalityliesinthat
Theformofbehavioritself(antirational)andthesubjectivemalignantbehavioroftheactor,thatis,theevilofthebehavioritselfisdetermined
Thebasisoftheillegalityofbehavior;
onthecontrary,theresultofnonvaluetheoryholdsthatthebasisofillegalityliesintheactionpair
Theinfringementoflegalinterestsortheresultofthethreat,thatis,theeviloftheresultofaction,isthebasisforjudgingtheillegalityoftheact.
Sofar,thegeneraltheoryofcriminallaw,includingChina,isbasedonthetheoryofbehavioralnonvalue
Zhangstartsfromthestandpointofthepreceding(behavior)andthegeneralperson'
spointofviewtoanalyzetheillegalityorbehavioroftheact
Socialharmfulness.However,inrecentyears,theincreasinglypowerfulresultofthenonvaluetheoryholdsthat,ontheonehand,theactisworthless
Itiseasytoformaviolationofethicalpathbytakingtheantiethicsasthebasisofillegality
Thebehaviorofmoralityisregardedasthetendencyofcrime;
ontheotherhand,insomecases,thereisalsoanimproperreductionofpunishment
Therefore,thisviewholdsthatwhentheactisillegalorsociallyharmful,itshouldbe
Fromthepointofviewofconflictorcomparisonoflegalinterests,engagedinpost(judgment)andscientificview(judge'
sposition)
Tojudge.
ThegeneraltheoryofcriminallawinChinahasalwaystakentheessentialcharacterofcrime,thatis,theentityofsocialharmfulness
Theanalysisisbasedonthestandpointandviewpointsimilartothetheoryofbehavioralnonvalue.Thinkaboutanalyzingsomebehavior,isn'
tit?
Whenitisharmfultosociety,itisnecessarytotakeintoconsiderationthesocialrelationship,thenature,themethodandthehandofthebehavior
Theconsequencesoftheactorthepossibleconsequences,thebehavioritself,thebehaviorofthesubjectivesituation,theline
Aperiodofsocialsituation,etc..Themostimportantproblemisthemethodofjudgingallkindsoffactorswhenconsideringbehavior
Itispossibletopunishcertainactsthatdonotreallyhavesocialharmfulnessandneedtobepunishedaccordingtothesituation,
Itiseasytoleadtothetendencyofconvictionofsubjectiveelementsofbehaviororientedpeople,andthistendencyisthecauseofourcountry
Oneofthereasonsforrepeatedprohibitionofextortingconfessionsbytortureinjudicialpractice.Therefore,itcriticizesthetheoryofbehavioralnonvalue
Thebookreviews
XiaoHuaLawVolume1-2002-1
Itisofpracticalsignificancetoadvocatetheresultsofnonvaluetheory.
Againiseclecticism(eclecticismpenaltystandpoint).Onthepurposeofpenalty,theoldschoolandthe
Thenewviewisdiametricallyopposite.Theformeradvocatesretributionpunishment,whilethelatteradvocateseducationalpunishment.Afterthat,because
Theoldschoolandnewschoolbetweentheintegration,therefore,inrespectofthepurposeofpenalty,thetwoisonthewaytocompromise.And
Doctrineisthepenaltyviewafterthiscompromise.Itregardsthetheoryofrelativeretributionasthecontent,andconsidersthejustificationofpenalty
Ontheonehandtomeettheconceptofjustice,onemustalsosowthewindandreapthewhirlwind,prevent
Ifacrimeisnecessaryandeffective,itshouldachievethepurposeofgeneralpreventionandspecialpreventionwithinthescopeofretributionpenalty.
Thatistosay,theultimateaimoftheconceptofpunishmentinconformitywiththedoctrineofpunishmentisultimatelyapproachingtheconceptofretributionpenalty.Itshouldbesaidthatinthetheoryofpunishment
Thisconceptistheinevitableconclusionofobjectivismintheviewofcriminaltheory,
Atthesametimeforourreason
Itprovidesatheoretica