一些英文审稿意见的模板Word文件下载.docx

一些英文审稿意见的模板Word文件下载.docx

《一些英文审稿意见的模板Word文件下载.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《一些英文审稿意见的模板Word文件下载.docx（5页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：

Theconclusionsareoverstated.Forexample,thestudydidnotshow

ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.

5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：

Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。

6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：

Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio?

7、对研究问题的定义：

Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,

writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem

8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:

Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.

9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:

Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.

10、严谨度问题：

MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.

11、格式（重视程度）：

Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihaveattachedapdffilewith"

InstructionsforAuthors"

whichshowsexamples.

Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenunderthe"

InstructionsandForms"

buttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.

12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：

有关语言的审稿人意见：

ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.

Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;

onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.

Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.Thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.

TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish.

PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?

thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.

作为审稿人，本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开（冒风险啊），

但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意，

就贴出来吧，当然，有关审稿人的名字，Email，文章题名信息等就都删除了，

以免造成不必要的麻烦！

希望朋友们多评价，其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家！

国人一篇文章投Mater.类知名国际杂志，

被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分！

个人认为文章还是有一些创新的，

所以作为审稿人我就给了66分，（这个分正常应该足以发表），提了一些修改意见，望作者修改后发表！

登录到编辑部网页一看，一个文章竟然有六个审稿人，

详细看了下打的分数，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但没有打分（另一国人审），最后一个没有回来！

两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的！

（括号斜体内容为我注解）

Reviewer4

ReviewerRecommendationTerm:

Reject

OverallReviewerManuscriptRating:

25

CommentstoEditor:

Reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.Pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.

Title（Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.）:

Prof.

Name:

XXX

Affiliation:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx

Manuscriptentitled"

SynthesisXXX。

。

"

ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.Thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly（seeRemark1）.Presentationandwritingisratherpoor;

thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata（forsomeseeRemarks2）andevensomeflaws（seeRemark3）.ForthesereasonsIsuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.

1.ThepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofXXXX,but:

-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofXXXXpowders（INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion）,（通常的写作格式，审稿人实际上很在意的）

-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,（INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion）,

-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofXXXXXXbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone（INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion）,

-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod（ABSTRACT,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION,CONCLUSIONS）.

（很多人不会写这个地方，大家多学习啊）

2.WhendiscussingXRDdataXXXauthors

-statethatXXXXX

-statethatXXXX

-Thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize?

（很多人用XRD，结果图放上去就什么都不管了，这是不应该的）

3.Whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswrite"

XXXXXIfthereissecondharmonicinexcitationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!

!

（研究了什么？

？

）

4.英语写作要提高

（这条很多人的软肋，大家努力啊）

Reviewer5

N/A

Title（Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.）rof.

（国人）

XXXXXXXXxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxx

Deareditor:

Thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitled"

XXXX“.Inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandXXXXXX，However,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorEnglishbeingused.

Thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelogicisnotclear.ExceptEnglishwriting,therearemanymistakesinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdon'

tshowgoodandnewresults.SoIrecommendtoyouthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.Thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthismanuscript:

（看看总体评价，不达标，很多人被这样郁闷了，当然审稿人也有他的道理）

1.TheXXXXXXX.However,thiskindmaterialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauthor'

smanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.Whatarethenovelfindingsinthepresentwork?

Thesynthesismethodandluminescencepropertiesreportedinthismanuscriptdidn'

tsupplyenoughevidencetosupporttheprimenoveltystatement.

（这位作者好猛，竟然翻出自己1997年的中文文章翻译了一边就敢投国际知名杂志，而且没有新的创新！

朋友们也看到了，一稿多发，中文，英文双版发表在网络时代太难了，运气不好审稿人也是国人，敢情曾经看过你的文章，所以必死无疑，这位作者老兄就命运差了，刚好被审稿人看见，所以毫无疑问被拒，（呵呵，我97年刚上初一没见到这个文章，哈哈））

2.Inpage5,theauthormentionedthat:

"

XXXXBasedonourknowledge,"

sintering"

describestheprocesswhenthepowdersbecomeceramics.So,Ithinktheword"

synthesis"

shouldbebetterinsteadof"

here.Second,theXRDpatternsdidn'

tshowobviousdifferencebetweenthree"

temperaturesof700,800and900?

C.

（作者老兄做工作太不仔细了，虫子们可别犯啊）

3.AlsointhepageX,theauthormentionedthat:

XXX。

However,theauthordidn'

tsupplythemorphologiesofparticlesatdifferentsynthesizingtemperatures.Whataretheexperimentalresultsorthereferenceswhichsupporttheauthor'

sconclusionthattheXXXXpropertieswouldbeinfluencedbytheparticlesize?

（作者仍在瞎说，这个问题我也指出了，不光我还是看着国人的份上让修改，添加很多东西，说实话，文章看的很累很累）

4.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXHowever,tomyknowledge,afterthemilling,theparticlessizewillbedecreasedexactly,buthowandwhattodestroythehoststructure?

（虫子们自己注意）

5.XXXontheverticalaxisoftheXRDpatternswasmeaningless,becauseauthoraddseveralpatternsinonefigure.Itisobviousthatthesespectraarenotmeasuredbyordinarymethods.（都是老问题，不说了）