外文翻译.docx

上传人:b****8 文档编号:9322803 上传时间:2023-05-18 格式:DOCX 页数:13 大小:140.55KB
下载 相关 举报
外文翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共13页
外文翻译.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共13页
亲,该文档总共13页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

外文翻译.docx

《外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

外文翻译.docx

外文翻译

外文文献翻译材料

(2010届)

瑞士社会健康保险:

共同支付

 

学生姓名应天城

学号06022229

院系医学院

专业公共事业管理(卫生事业管理)

指导教师潘传德

填写日期2009年11月3日

SWISSSOCIALHEALTH

INSURANCE:

CO-PAYMENTS

WORK

STEFANFELDERAND

ANDREASWERBLOW

Fromtheperspectiveofaninsurancecommunity,co-paymentsareonlyinterestingiftheyaffecttotalexpenditurebyadecreaseintheprobabilityorthesizeofdamages.Iftheinsuredtakepreventive

actionstoreducetheriskorchangetheirbehaviorwhendamagesoccur,theirexpenditurewilldecrease.Ifinsurancecoverageiscomprehensive,

importantincentivesforpreventionandrestrictingdamagesareabsent.Economistsspeakofmoralhazard,referringtotheeffectoftheextentofinsurancecoverageonthebehavioroftheinsured.

Inhealthinsurance,theinsuredhaveaparticularlylargeinfluenceontheamountofservicestheydemand.Healthyfood,sufficientphysicalmotion,preventionofstress,allthesereducetheprobabilityofanillness.Moreover,thebehaviorincaseofanillness,i.e.thechoiceoftherapyorthepatients’compliancewiththephysicians’prescriptionswillsubstantiallyaffecthealthcareexpenditure.Docopaymentsreducemoralhazardinhealthinsurance?

Swisssocialhealthinsuranceisanidealcandidateforstudyingthisissue,asco-paymentshavealongtraditionthere.

CharacteristicsoftheSwisshealthinsurancesystem

InSwitzerland,100percentofthepopulationisenrolledinthestatutory(basic)healthinsurancesystem.Inthecomplementaryprivateinsurance

sector,theequivalenceprincipleholds–theinsuredpayriskequivalentpremiums.Bycomparison,communityratingappliesinsocialhealthinsurance,i.e.everypersonwithinasicknessfundpaysthesamepremiumirrespectiveofhis/herrisk.Thisimpliesthattheso-calledgoodrisks(personswhosepaymentsexceedtheirexpectedexpendsubsidizethebadrisks(personswithpaymentsbelowtheexpectedexpenditure).Withthe

givenhealthcareexpenditureprofiles,communityratingmeansforinstancethattheyoungsubsidizetheoldandthatmensubsidizewomen.

IncontrasttoGermanyandothercountries,Switzerlanddoesnotimposeanysubstantialinterregionalredistributioninfinancinghealthcare.

Premiumsaredifferentiatedaccordingtoregionaldifferencesinhealthcareexpenditure.Furthermore,contributionstohealthinsurancearenotpaidfromthepayrollbutfunctionasinotherinsurancesectors.

Everyindividual–adult,adolescentorchild–thereforepayshis/herownpremium.Nevertheless,lowincomepersonsreceiveasubsidyfromthelocalgovernmentaswellasfromthefederalstatetopayforhealthinsurance.Theaveragehealthinsurancepremiumisaround€170permonth.

Co-paymentsinSwisshealthinsuranceincludeaminimal€160deductibleperyear.Expenditurethatexceedsthisthresholdissubjecttoa10percentco-insurancerate.Thesystemiscapped:

themaximumco-paymentforapersonis€560.Thisimpliesthatmedicalbillsupto€4,160(€160plus€4,000)aresubjecttodemand-sideco-insurance.90percentoftheinsuredhaveexpenditurebelowthisthreshold.Exemptionsforchronicallyillorlow-incomepersonsfromthecompulsorycopayment

rulesdonoexist.Thisconsistentemploymentofcoinsuranceisdirectedatmoralhazard.Theadverseequityimplicationisseenastheprice

thatthecommunitymustpayforachievingamoreefficientuseofhealthcareservices.

InSwitzerland,theinsuredcanoptforadeductibleabove€160.Theoptionaldeductiblesamountto€270,€400,€800and€1,000.Theycomewith(maximal)premiumrebatesof8percent,15percent,30percentand40percent.The10percentcoinsurancerateforexpenditureabovethedeductibledoesnotchange.Thisisalsovalidforthecap,whichisonlyadjustedbythechosendeductible.

Thegoaloftheoptionaldeductiblesistoinfluencethedemandforhealthcareservicesbytheinsured,i.e.tofightmoralhazard.However,thereisadisadvantagetotheseoptions.Theyallowtheinsuredtochoosetheinsurancecontractthatsuitstheirexpectedhealthcareexpenditurebest.Inotherwords,goodriskswilloptforahighdeductible,whereasbadriskswillstayputwiththecompulsoryminimaldeductible.Still,eventhoughindividualswillrationallychoosethesizeofthedeductible,theincentivesofthemeasureremain.Yet,theyarereinforcedsincetheextent

ofco-paymentshasbeenenlargedbytheseoptions.

Moralhazardorself-selection?

–Thatisthequestion!

While60percentoftheinsuredsticktotheminimaldeductible,40percentchooseoneofthehigherdeductibles(seeFig.1thatsummarizesthesharesforarepresentativesampleof60,000personsinthecantonofZurich).Oftheseindividuals,threefourthsoptedforthe€270deductible.Thefigurerevealsasubstantialdecreaseingrosshealth

careexpenditurewithanincreasingdeductible.Apersonwiththeminimaldeductible(€160)onaverageincurred€2,150healthcareexpenditure

peryear;theaverageinthehighestdeductible(€1,000)onlyamountedto€510.ThesecondbarineachcategoryofFigure1representshealthcareexpenditurenetofthepatients’co-payments.Thethirdbarillustratestheaveragepremiumperdeductible.Acomparisonwiththeexpendituresshowsthatdespitelargerebates,asubstantiallyfinancialredistributionfromlow-tohigh-riskindividualsoccurs.

Theseobservationsdonottellwhetherthelowerexpenditureinthehigherdeductibleclassesisinthefirstplaceaconsequenceofthecontractselectionbytheinsured,expectingdifferentfuturehealthcareexpenditure,orwhetheritisareflectionofachangeinthebehavioroftheinsured.Onewouldexpectthatbothself-selectionandmoralhazardmatter.Theseparationofthetwoeffectsismethodologicallychallenging,asthetwosimultaneouslyshowupinthehealthcareexpendituredata.Whileoneobserveslowerexpenditureoftheinsuredwhohaveoptedforahighdeductible,onedoesnotknowthereasonforit.

Inthe1980s,theRANDcorporationsponsoredanextensivestudydesignedtodetectthepriceeffectofdeductiblesonthedemandforhealthcare.Inacontrolledrandomizedexperiment,personswereallocatedwithhealthinsurancecontractsthatdifferedwithrespecttotheco-insurancerate.Sincethepersonshadnopossibilitytochoosetheircontract,

aselectioneffectcouldbeexcluded.Onaverage,theRANDresearchersdetectedareductionof20-30percentinthedemandforhealthcaredue

toco-insurance(seeManningetal.1987).IntheSwisssystem,personshavethechoicebetweendifferentdeductibles.Ifoneexpectsthatthechoicereflectstheexpectationoffuturehealthcareexpenditure,theproblemofself-selectioncanbesolvedbyexplicitlyincorporatingthechoiceofcontracts.This,indeed,wastheapproachwetookintheSwiss

study.Inthefirststep,weestimatedthechoiceoftheindividualswithrespecttothesizeofthedeductible.Inthesecondstep,takingintoaccounttheresultsofthefirststep,weestimatedtheinfluenceofthe

deductiblesonthedemandforhealthcareservices.Threemonthspriortotheendofoneyear,aninsuredhastochoosethedeductibleinhis

healthinsurancecontractforthenextyear.Inthisdecision,he/shewilltakeintoaccountthehealth-careexpenditurehe/sheexpectsforthefollowingyear.Ifthepremiumrebateexceedstheexpectedadditional

co-payments,he/shewilllikelyoptforahighdeductible.Whyshouldapersonwhoexpectsverylowhealth-careexpenditurenotgoforthehighestdeductible?

Achronicallyillperson,bycomparison,willlikelyadheretotheminimaldeductible.

IntheSwissstudywemodeledthecontractchoiceusingindividual

healthcareexpendituredataofthefollowingthreeyears,1997–1999.Theexpenditurein1997and1998wereusedtoformtheexpectationof

futureexpenditure,astheyindicatethehealthstatusofanindividual.Additionalexplanatoryvariablesforthechoiceofthecontractfor1999aretheindividual’sage,sex,incomeaswellashis/herpremium(fordetails,seeWerblowandFelder2003).

Theestimationresultsconfirmthehypotheses:

Thehigherhealthcareexpenditureinthepast,thehighertheprobabilitythatanindividualdistanceshimselffromchoosinganoptional(higher)deductible.Low-incomeindividualslikewisepreferthecompulsoryminimaldeductible.Individualswithalowincomefeartheriskofhighco-paymentsmorethanhigh-incomepersons.Individualslivinginhigh-premiumregionsmorelikelychooseahigherdeductible.Thishastodowiththeregulation

ofproportionalrebates.Foranydeductible,therebateinabsoluteterms,therefore,increaseswiththepremiumlevel.Forthisreason,inhighpremiumregions,itismoreprofitabletorestrictinsurancecoveragebymeansofahighdeductible.

DoesmoralhazardexistinSwisshealth-careinsurance?

Inthesecondstepoftheestimation,wedealtwiththeexplanationofthedemandforhealth-careservices,giventhechoiceofcontract.Bytakingintoaccounttheendogeneityofthechoice,itispossibletonet-outtheeffectofselectionfromthechangeindemand.Inthesecondestimation,age,sexandincome,butalsosupply-sidefactorssuchasthe

densityofphysiciansintheneighborhoodofaninsuredserveasexplanatoryvariablesforthedemandforhealth-careservices.Theestimationresultsconfirmtoalargeextenttheexistenceofmoralhazard.Despiteself-selection,health-careexpenditureforhigh-deductibleindividualsissignificantlylowercomparedtoindividualswithaminimaldeductible.

Figure2summarizestheresultsforanaveragemaleperson.Thefirstbarineachcategoryshowstheobservedreductionofhealth-careexpenditureforthefouroptionaldeductiblescomparedtothelevelofthemin

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 经管营销 > 经济市场

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2