GRE 写作 pp3中writing assessment的范文完全版.docx

GRE 写作 pp3中writing assessment的范文完全版.docx

《GRE 写作 pp3中writing assessment的范文完全版.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE 写作 pp3中writing assessment的范文完全版.docx（62页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

GRE写作pp3中writingassessment的范文完全版

PP3中AnalyticalWriting的范文（完全版）

所有已经注册GREgeneral考试的gters在注册后大约一个月后，可以收到ETS邮寄过来的免费的POWERPREP3.0（abbr.PP3）光盘，光盘中的PP3软件可以提供机考的模拟和作文的模拟，其中含有关于AnalyticalWriting的介绍和范文。

所以强烈建议大家使用这个软件来进行机考作文的模拟练习。

POWERPREP软件下载地址为：

http:

//www.gre.org/pprepdwnld.html

从2003年7月开始，ETS决定在中国内地、中国港台地区和韩国四地举行的GRE考试将改为机考与笔试相结合。

改用新方法后，GRE作文部分将实行机考，语文和数学部分为笔试。

所以2003-2004年度的GREAnalyticalWriting考试将改为在计算机上进行。

考点设在ETS在中国的各个CBT（Computer-basedCenter）计算机考试中心。

为方便广大gters准备作文，蝎子把PP3中提供的AnalyticalWriting的范文整理出来，以便大家浏览和下载。

完全版列出了分数为6分~1分的文章。

由于这些文章是ETS从考生的作文中挑出来的，大家可以看到这些文章中有文字错误，甚至有的作文有标题。

希望大家看看这些作文好在那里，对自己有什么帮助，而不是拿去通篇背诵，因为没有必要。

本文第一部分是介绍AnalyticalWriting（即过去的WritingAssessment）的内容以及两类文章（ISSUE和ARGUMENT）的评分标准。

第二部分是ISSUE的范文（3TOPICS），每档分数各有一篇范文，更可贵的是每篇文章后面有相应的评语（COMMENTARY）。

第三部分是ARGUMENT的范文（3TOPICS），每档分数各有一篇范文，也有相应的评语。

P.S.红蝎子在2002年7月整理过《PP2中WritingAssessment的范文》，与本文的内容是一致的。

ETS对于AnalyticalWriting考试提供的范文和评分标准和过去提供的并没有变化。

@红蝎子@

2003年4月

DescriptionoftheWritingAssessment

TheGREWritingAssessmentconsistsoftwoanalyticalwritingtasks:

*a45-minute"PresentYourPerspectiveonanIssue"task

*a30-minute"AnalyzeanArgument"task

Youwillbegivenachoicebetweentwo"Issue"topics.Eachstatesanopiniononanissueofbroadinterestandasksyoutodiscusstheissuefromanyperspective（s）youwish,solongasyouproviderelevantreasonsandexamplestoexplainandsupportyourviews.

Youwillnothaveachoiceof"Argument"topics.Instead,thecomputerwillpresentanargumentforyoutoanalyze.The"Argument"taskpresentsadifferentchallengefromthatofthe"Issue"task:

itrequiresyoutocritiqueagivenargumentbydiscussinghowwellreasonedyoufindit.Youwillneedtoconsiderthelogicalsoundnessoftheargumentratherthantoagreeordisagreewiththepositionitpresents.

Thus,thetwotasksarecomplementaryinthatonerequiresyoutoconstructyourownargumentbytakingapositionandprovidingevidencesupportingyourviewsontheissue,whereastheotherrequiresyoutocritiquesomeoneelse'sargumentbyassessingitsclaimsandevaluatingtheevidenceitprovides.

HowtheTestIsScored

Eachessayisholisticallyscoredona6-pointscaleaccordingtothecriteriaindicatedintheGREWritingAssessmentscoringguides.Holisticscoringmeansthateachessayisjudgedasawhole:

readersdonotseparatetheessayintocomponentpartsandawardacertainnumberofpointsforaparticularcriterionorelementsuchasorganization,sentencestructure,orlanguage.Instead,readersassignscoresbasedonthetotalqualityoftheessay,consideringallofitscharacteristicsinanintegratedway.Excellentorganizationorpoororganization,forexample,willbepartofthereaders'overallimpressionofthewritingandwillthereforecontributetothescore,butorganization,asadistinctfeature,hasnospecificweight.

GREreadersarecollegeanduniversityfacultyexperiencedinteachingwritingorwriting-intensivecourses.AllGREreadershaveundergonecarefultraining,passedstringentGREqualifyingtests,anddemonstratedthattheyareabletomaintainahighdegreeofscoringaccuracy.

Toensurefairnessandobjectivityinscoring

--essayswillberandomlydistributedtothereaders

--allidentifyinginformationaboutthetesttakerswillbeconcealedfromthereaders

--eachessaywillbescoredbytworeaders

--readerswillnotknowwhatotherscoresanessaymayhavereceived

--thescoringprocedurerequiresthateachessayreceiveidenticaloradjacentscoresfromtworeaders;anyotherscorecombinationwillbeadjudicatedbyathirdGREreader

TopreparefortheGREWritingAssessment,orforanyotheressaytest,youshouldbesuretoreviewthecriteriabywhichyourworkwillbejudged.ToreviewtheGREscoringcriteriaclickontheScoringGuidesbelow.

SCORINGGUIDEFORPRESENTYOURPERSPECTIVEONANISSUE

GREESSAYSCORINGGUIDE:

PERSPECTIVEONANISSUESCORE

6A6paperpresentsacogent,well-articulatedanalysisofthecomplexitiesoftheissueanddemonstratesmasteryoftheelementsofeffectivewriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--developsapositionontheissuewithinsightfulreasonsand/orpersuasiveexamples

--sustainsawell-focused,well-organizeddiscussion

--expressesideasclearlyandprecisely

--useslanguagefluently,withvariedsentencestructureandeffectivevocabulary

--demonstratessuperiorfacilitywiththeconventions（grammar,usage,andmechanics）ofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhaveminorflaws

5A5paperpresentsawell-developedanalysisofthecomplexitiesoftheissueanddemonstratesastrongcontroloftheelementsofeffectivewriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--developsapositionontheissuewithwell-chosenreasonsand/orexamples

--isfocusedandgenerallywellorganized

--expressesideasclearlyandwell

--usesvariedsentencestructureandappropriatevocabulary

--demonstratesfacilitywiththeconventionsofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhaveminorflaws

4A4paperpresentsacompetentanalysisoftheissueanddemonstratesadequatecontroloftheelementsofwriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--developsapositionontheissuewithrelevantreasonsand/orexamples

--isadequatelyorganized

--expressesideasclearly

--demonstratesadequatecontroloflanguagebutmaylacksentencevariety

--demonstratescontroloftheconventionsofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhavesomeflaws

3A3paperdemonstratessomecompetenceinitsanalysisoftheissueandinitscontroloftheelementsofwritingbutisclearlyflawed.

AtypicalpaperinthiscategoryexhibitsONEORMOREofthefollowingcharacteristics:

--isvagueorlimitedindevelopingapositionontheissue

--isweakintheuseofrelevantreasonsorexamples

--ispoorlyfocusedand/orpoorlyorganized

--hasproblemsexpressingideasclearly

--useslanguageimpreciselyand/orlackssentencevariety

--containsoccasionalmajorerrorsorfrequentminorerrorsingrammar,usage,ormechanics

2A2paperdemonstratesseriousweaknessesinanalyticalwriting.

AtypicalpaperinthiscategoryexhibitsONEORMOREofthefollowingcharacteristics:

--isunclearorseriouslylimitedindevelopingapositionontheissue

--providesfew,ifany,relevantreasonsorexamples

--isunfocusedand/ordisorganized

--hasseriousandfrequentproblemsintheuseoflanguageandsentencestructure

--containsnumerouserrorsingrammar,usage,ormechanicsthatinterferewithmeaning

1A1paperdemonstratesfundamentaldeficienciesinanalyticalwritingskills.

AtypicalpaperinthiscategoryexhibitsONEORMOREofthefollowingcharacteristics:

--provideslittleevidenceoftheabilitytodevelopororganizeacoherentresponsetothetopic

--hassevereandpersistenterrorsinlanguageandsentencestructure

--containsapervasivepatternoferrorsingrammar,usage,ormechanicsthatseverelyinterfereswithmeaning

0Offtopic,inaforeignlanguage,merelycopiesthetopic,consistsofonlykeystrokecharacters,orisillegible,blank,ornonverbal

SCORINGGUIDEFORANALYZEANARGUMENT

GREESSAYSCORINGGUIDE:

ANALYZEANARGUMENTSCORE

6A6paperpresentsacogent,well-articulatedcritiqueoftheargumentanddemonstratesmasteryoftheelementsofeffectivewriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--clearlyidentifiesimportantfeaturesoftheargumentandanalyzestheminsightfully

--developsideascogently,organizesthemlogically,andconnectsthemwithcleartransitions

--effectivelysupportsthemainpointsofthecritique

--demonstratescontroloflanguage,includingdictionandsyntacticvariety

--demonstratesfacilitywiththeconventionsofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhaveminorflaws

5A5paperpresentsawell-developedcritiqueoftheargumentanddemonstratesgoodcontroloftheelementsofeffectivewriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--clearlyidentifiesimportantfeaturesoftheargumentandanalyzestheminagenerallythoughtfulway

--developsideasclearly,organizesthemlogically,andconnectsthemwithappropriatetransitions

--sensiblysupportsthemainpointsofthecritique

--demonstratescontroloflanguage,includingdictionandsyntacticvariety

--demonstratesfacilitywiththeconventionsofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhaveoccasionalflaws

4A4paperpresentsacompetentcritiqueoftheargumentanddemonstratesadequatecontroloftheelementsofwriting.

Atypicalpaperinthiscategory

--identifiesandanalyzesimportantfeaturesoftheargument

--developsandorganizesideassatisfactorilybutmaynotconnectthemwithtransitions

--supportsthemainpointsofthecritique

--demonstratessufficientcontroloflanguagetoconveyideaswithreasonableclarity

--generallyfollowstheconventionsofstandardwrittenEnglishbutmayhaveflaws

3A3paperdemonstratessomecompetenceinanalyticalwritingskillsandinitscontroloftheelementsofwritingbutisplainlyflawed.

AtypicalpaperinthiscategoryexhibitsONEORMOREofthefollowingcharacteristics:

--doesnotidentifyoranalyzemostoftheimportantfeaturesoftheargument,althoughsomeanalysisoftheargumentispresent

--mainlyanalyzestangentialorirrelevantmatters,orreasonspoorly

--islimitedinthelogicaldevelopmentandorganizationofideas

--offerssupportoflittlerelevanceandvalueforpointsofthecritique

--doesnotconveymeaningclearly

--containsoccasionalmajorerrorsorfrequentminorerrorsingrammar,usage,ormechanics

2A2paperdemonstratesseriousweaknessesinanalyticalwritingskills.

AtypicalpaperinthiscategoryexhibitsONEORMOREofthefollowingcharacteristics:

--doesnotpresentacritiquebas