Analysis of reader questions in the contemporary Western literary theory and its evolution in the hi.docx

Analysis of reader questions in the contemporary Western literary theory and its evolution in the hi.docx

《Analysis of reader questions in the contemporary Western literary theory and its evolution in the hi.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Analysis of reader questions in the contemporary Western literary theory and its evolution in the hi.docx（6页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

AnalysisofreaderquestionsinthecontemporaryWesternliterarytheoryanditsevolutioninthehi

AnalysisofreaderquestionsinthecontemporaryWesternliterarytheoryanditsevolutioninthehighlights

PaperKeywords:

theissueofWesternhighcultureliterarytheorypopulartextreader

Abstract:

Inthispaper,receptionaesthetics,sociologyofliterature,andFiske’stheoryofmasscultureasanobject,thereadersortouttheproblemincontemporaryWesternliterarytheoryinthegenerationandevolutionofthispaperthatthetheoryoftheevolutionoftherootcauseisthattheculturalindustriestheemergenceandmaturity.Enlightenmentastheintellectualresources,theexplanatorypowerofculturalindustriesisdeclining,ifthatisthecoreoftheEnlightenmentvalue“oftheperfectsearch,”thenhowdemocraticvalues​​inbetweenitandseekaharmoniousstate,hasbecomeaproblemofcontemporaryliterarytheory.

Traditionalliterarytheoryandliterarystudies,hasalwayspreferredauthorsandworks,justtakethereaderaspassivereceivers.The1960s,theWesternliterarytheoryhasundergoneahugechange,severalgroupsofdifferentorientationoftheschoolortheresearchers,payingcloseattentionfromreadersintheprocessofliteraryproductionandconsumptionintherolethereader’sappreciationofthesubjectasanart,inliteratureproductionstatusofthewholesystemwashighlyemphasized.thetransferofinterestinthisstudy,theculturalindustryinpost-warriseoftheWesternworldconsequences.thecultureindustry-specificmodeofproduction,resultingin,includingliteraryworks,includingthekindsofproductsofmasscultureinthissituation,theresearcherssuddenlyrealizethatyoumustconstructanewtheorytoexplainthetext,theproducer,therelationshipbetweenthereader,theperspectiveofthewholeprocessofliteraryproductioncycle.

First,thereaderwilllooklockedinthebodyofresearchersisJaussandIser’sreceptionaestheticssuchasfounder,comparedtootherresearchers,theirinterestfocusedontheresearchparadigmmoreupdates.Jaussasaliteraryhistoryprofessor,thattheliteraturehassuffereda“methodologicalcrisis”:

thepreviousstudyinMarxisttheoryandRussianformalism,representedbytheformeremphasisonexternalresearchliterature,whichfocustoomuchonaninternalstudyofliterature,both.“fragmentedliteratureandhistory,aestheticsandhistoricalmethodsoftheassociationbetweenthemethods“.①Therefore,JaussinspiredbyGadamer’sattempttoacceptthetextfromthereader’spointofviewtheprocesstofindabreakthroughintwowaystoconnect.”Onlywhentheworkisnolongeracontinuationofthoughtfromthemainproductionareas,andfromconsumptionofthemainaspectsofthinking,thatislinkedfromtheauthorandthepublicaspectsofthinkinginordertowritealiteraryandarthistory“.②

Jaussthatthetextreadnotsimply“copy”ormirror-like“reflection.”Thisisbecauseanyreaderintheappreciationofliteraturebefore,hismindisnot“white”one,“butinpracticeafullrangeoflifehasformedacomprehensive,includingtheappreciationoftheactualneedsandcapabilities,includingtheaestheticrealm,thatis,pre-understandingofthetext“.③Jausswillthispre-understandingas”lookingsight.“Heproposedthatliteratureoftenbreakthereader’s“expectationhorizon”,whichconstitutestheaestheticexperienceofthechallengesandthealienationeffect.’simagewasalreadyfamiliarwithsubversion,andbeyond,rewrite,andsothewritingstyle,readerswillresultintheaestheticprocessimpact.Forexample,<<awakening>>,<<SisterCarrie>>otherworksre-shapingtheimageofwomen,<<AmericanTragedy>>,<<TheGreatGatsby>>andotherworksonthe“AmericanDream”re-interpretation,willchallengereaderstoexperiencetheoriginallifeforJauss,theliterature’staskisto“lookforwardtothesightof”objective,itwillreadtheprocessofgoingthroughthechallengesofstyledescribetheexperience,wethuscanbeinferred,thetaskofliteratureistoanalyzethedifferentperiodsoftimereadersofthesametextindifferentways,ordifferentsectorsofthesameperiodofsocialgroupstoacceptthetextthesamewaytowardsthesimilaritiesanddifferences,toacceptthisinterpretationoftheaestheticwaytogetthroughthehistoricalmethodsandaestheticsMethodsFollowingJauss,theEthelandfurtherproposedthe“impliedreader”ofthenotionthateachtexthasthepotentialsignificanceofthestructure,therearestructuralgapsrequiresthereadertofillinthereadingprocess,sowhenthereaderReadandaccordingtotheirownexperiencetofillthesegaps,heenteredthedefaultauthorofthestructureofthisprocessisknownastheworksofEthel’s“callstructure.”Thus,readersoftheprocess,thatis,bythetext“callsstructure“tocapturetheprocess.

AlthoughIserandJauss’stheoryofaestheticsistoacceptthesamepeople,buttheysketchedouttheimageofthereadersarequitedifferent.Jaussto“lookforwardtosight”todescribetheimageofareader,althoughtheexperienceoffacingthechallengesbroughtbythetext,butTheyarebeinggivenacolorofEnlightenmentrationality,stillhavetheexperienceandexperienceagainsttheautonomyoftheupdate,butthisautonomyinthe“callstructure,”explainedinside,butlostthe.Thisisnottosaythatthereaderbecomesagainimportant,butratherthatconstantlycallsthereaderbythetextbecausethetextoftheconsumerinthetextcontinuetobecomethedrivingforceofreproduction,thislineofthoughtisclearzonesonthestigmaofstructuralism.Specifically,theauthorofcapitalismliterarymarket,isthereaderforthesustenanceoftheirwritingprocessalsohadtoconsiderhowtosetupcallstructureinordertoattractreadersReadersoftheauthorofthiseffect,supportedbytheFrenchscholarRobertaceLorisheightattention.

AceKapilisthefounderofthesociologyofliterature,hemadethisnewresearchmethods,clearlycarrytheEthelproblems.AceKapilsaid:

“Allworks,aslongasthereadercancheerrecreation,theassociation,orviceversa,cancausethereadertothinkabout,thereadercangraduallyimprovetheculturalenrichment,canbeturnedintoliterature.“④viewofthisliteratureisclearlybasedontherelationshipbetweenwriterandreader,buthequicklydiscovered,Readersoftheimpactofwriters,forliterarypurposesisapotentialdanger.aceLorisInthisshowthecomplexityofarathercontradictoryattitude,ontheonehand,hecriticizedthecreationoftheEnlightenmentconceptofelitismafterthatthewriterbeenshapedtoomuchlikeatotemmyth,itdoesnotmeetthevalues​​ofdemocracyontheotherhand,hecriticizedthecurrentbest-sellerrelationshipbetweenauthorsandreaders,moreandmorebusinessintotherelationshipbetweenfashionstarsandgroupies.Hefoundthattobesoughtafter,andthereadertofollowthe“Halo”,isincreasinglybecomingthemaindriverofwritersandifundertheinfluenceofthewriterinthiswriting,caughtina“parasiticcycle”,thatthetext

creatorslearntodropandthenecessaryaestheticdistancebetweenthereadertogoalongwiththereader’sappreciationofvision,andaestheticdistanceispreciselythecoreoftheconceptofEthel.

AceKapilreadfurtherdistinguishesbetweentwokinds:

oneisthe“literaryreadinginthechannel”,thatinordertoenrichthemselveswiththeirownliterature,culturalenrichmenttoreadingmotivation,andtheotheristhe“channelofthereadingpublic”,whichbearsakindofliteraryworksthroughthe“resort”spirit,toeasethepressureofreallife,themotivationtogetridofthestatusquo.Moreoften,peopletendtobookreadersasprivategoods,justtoshowoff,collection,investmentandpurchaseofliteraturebooks.Forexample,thenovel<<TheGreatGatsby>>inthedescriptionofsuchadetail:

Gatsby’smansioninonestudy,neatlyarrangedonshelvescountryclassics,butallthebooksofthepackagingintact,showingthatthesebooksneverreadtheownerofthesefinebooks,buttheprivateownertoidentifythequalityarticlesonly.Moreover,themassaudiencewillbemixedwithsomeofthepracticalreadingmotivation,suchasforsleep,entertainment,talkandotherlifeneedstoread.Allinall,thiswayofreading,theliteraryworksofliteratureandknowledgehadrelegatedtosecondplace.Forthis,inturn,advocateKapilAceliteraryspiritoftheEnlightenment,thattheliteraryreadingshouldnotisseenasautilitarianmeans,butshouldbeanendinitself-isthereadertryingtoreadtheworksofothersintothespiritualworldthebestwaytoreadisasocialstatuswiththeabsurdhumanwaytocompete,soEscaPapercriticizedtheEnlightenmenteliteconsciousness,ontheotherinthefaceofpopularliteraturefromtheEnlightenmentspendingtimeandhavethemfishforresources.However,thisgainisclearlyaformofgoodwishes,ofcourse,meansthemassofreaderswillnotbechanged.AceLorisproblemsmeanthattheEnlightenmentideaof​​acrisisofartdo?

Interestingly,FiskeandaceLorisprovidesacompletelydifferentperspective.Fiskeisaculturalindustryinthelonglifeofmoreandmoreeaseofculturetheorists.HecompletelyabandonedtheEnlightenmenteliteposition,commercializationandconsumptionofliteraturenolongerlethimworry.Inotherwords,herespectedthatcannolongereagerto“arousethereader’sfoodforthought”,“thereadergraduallyincreaseculturalenrichment“ofliterature,butturnedtheirattentiontothosew