完整word版SCI修改稿审稿人意见范文模板.docx
《完整word版SCI修改稿审稿人意见范文模板.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《完整word版SCI修改稿审稿人意见范文模板.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
完整word版SCI修改稿审稿人意见范文模板
SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)
ListofResponses
DearEditorsandReviewers:
Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:
文章稿号)。
Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches。
Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval。
Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper。
Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer'scommentsareasflowing:
Respondstothereviewer’scomments:
Reviewer#1:
1.Responsetocomment:
(……简要列出意见……)
Response:
××××××
2。
Responsetocomment:
(……简要列出意见……)
Response:
××××××
。
。
.。
。
.
逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:
Weareverysorryforournegligenceof…….。
。
Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting…….。
.
ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……
WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.
Wehavere—writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestion
AsReviewersuggestedthat……
ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:
Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments。
Reviewer#2:
同上述
Reviewer#3:
××××××
Otherchanges:
1.Line60—61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………"
2.Line107,“……”wasadded
3.Line129,“……"wasdeleted
××××××
Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript。
Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper。
WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.
Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions
以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复.与大家分享。
从中可以看出,这位审稿人认真读了文章,提出很多宝贵的意见。
这些意见
分布在文章的各个地方。
我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。
看到这些意见,
我觉得很感激,不是因为接收文章的原因,而是这些意见能真正有助于提高
文章的质量。
从中还看出,回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。
对于回答问题,有的人就是一味反驳,却不加改进。
记得ACSStyleGuide里面说,当审稿人问到问题的,哪怕是他理解错误,这
也说明作者这么写,其他读者也会理解错误,引起歧义。
因此,作者就是要
修改句子,使表达不引起歧义.
因此:
有时间一味反驳,还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。
============================================
Reviewers’comments:
Reviewer#3:
Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes。
Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.
1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly。
2。
Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?
3。
Experimentalpart:
Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid—solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea。
Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.
4。
Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup。
5。
ReslutsPart(Page6):
"COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages”,themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?
Further,itwassuggestedthatCO—saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments。
Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?
6。
Page12,2ndpara:
ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?
Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara.Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig.7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn’tappear,onlyfigure7appeared.Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B。
etc.tobecorrected.
7.Page14,1stpara:
'contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo—ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy’,butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature。
8.Pages14through17:
theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface(figs3&4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely。
Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?
CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail。
9。
Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g.,page3para1:
Itwasgeneralizedthat。
。
.。
。
.。
。
.,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara。
10.Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy。
===============================================
DearEditor,
Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments。
NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS—06—247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer’scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable。
Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow.
[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction。
HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph.
[1]Ambiguousstatementi.e。
“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted。
[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow—coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid-solidinterface。
EtPyisareactantusedinliquid—phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies。
MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3.2.
[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers。
Referenceswereadded.AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation。
[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1。
[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO。
InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0。
85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30—45min。
WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn'tchange,indicating60minisalreadyenough。
AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasafunctionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation.
[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks。
ThementionofFig.7aand7betc。
throughoutthetextwereallcorrected。
[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono-ring.Wesawthedamageofo—ringafterusinghigh—concentrationEtPy。
AreferencetotheVitono—ringinformationwasgiven。
[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.
[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.
[10]Thetoo—longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.
Inall,Ifoundthereviewer’scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaperpoint—by—point。
Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!
==============================================
结果:
http:
//dx.doi。
org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.005
欢迎浏览:
OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces(Review)
Z.Ma,F。
Zaera*,SurfaceScenceReports61(2006)229—281。
ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry
http:
//dx。
doi.org/10。
1016/j。
surfrep.2006.03.001
CI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分)
ListofResponses
DearEditorsandReviewers:
Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:
文章稿号).Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches。
Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:
Respondstothereviewer’scomments:
Reviewer#1:
1.Responsetocomment:
(……简要列出意见……)
Response:
××××××
2。
Responsetocomment:
(……简要列出意见……)
Response:
××××××
。
。
。
。
。
.
逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:
Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...
Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……。
.。
ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……
WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.
Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'ssuggestion
AsReviewersuggestedthat……
ConsideringtheReviewer'ssuggestion,wehave……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:
Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments。
Reviewer#2:
同上述
Reviewer#3:
××××××
Otherchanges:
1.Line60—61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”
2.Line107,“……”wasadded
3。
Line129,“……"wasdeleted
××××××
Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript。
Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.
WeappreciateforEdit