提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx

上传人:b****1 文档编号:3252572 上传时间:2023-05-05 格式:DOCX 页数:15 大小:29.52KB
下载 相关 举报
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共15页
提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共15页
亲,该文档总共15页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx

《提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译.docx

提高营销人员招聘成效外文文献翻译

文献出处:

BrehmerA,LillyB,TippinsMJ.ImprovingSalespersonRecruitment:

ExaminingPracticesofScreeningCandidatesforPotentialSuccessversusPotentialFailure[J].JournalofAppliedBusinessandEconomics,2013,15

(1):

29-38.

原文

ImprovingSalespersonRecruitment:

ExaminingPracticesofScreeningCandidatesforPotentialSuccessversusPotentialFailure

BrehmerA,LillyB,TippinsMJ

Salespersonrecruitmenteffortslargelytargetidentifyingcandidateswhoappeartopossess'salessuccesstraits'.However,successtraitsmaydifferfromfailuretraits.Theoryandpracticebothdevotelowattentiontounderstandingtheunsuccessfulsalesperson,andhowtoincorporatesalesfailureintotherecruitmentprocess.Thispaperreportstheresultsofanexploratorystudythatexaminessalespersonrecruitment,teststhenotionthatrecruiters'overlook'failureissues,anddevelopsvariablesthatshouldmotivatefailureprobing,whichshouldbeusefulfortheoryandpractice.

INTRODUCTION

Oneofthemostimportanttasksfacingsalesmanagersishiringtherightpeople.Personnelselectionreceivessignificantinterestintheacademicsalesliterature,withstudiesexaminingantecedentsandconsequencesofhiringdecisions(e.g.,Ganesan,WeitzandJohn1993),trendsinrecruitmentpractices(e.g.,Cronetal.2005),hiringforcontextsthatinvolveinternationalsalesefforts(Honeycutt,FordandKurtzman1996),andindividualcharacteristicsthatsignalpotentialfit(e.g.,Maxwelletal.2005).Personnelselectionalsoreceivesattentioninpractitionerliterature,reflectedintheGoodtoGreatkeyfindingthat"gettingtherightpeopleonthebus"iscritical(Collins2001),andinmanageriallyorientedarticlesthatprovideexperience-basedinsightsandsuggestionsrelatedtohiring.Theresearchreportedinthispaperinvestigatestwointriguingsalesrecruitmentinsightsreportedinarecentpractitionerorientedarticle(HRChallyGroup2007).Thisprojectexploresandextendstheinsightsinamannerusefultotheacademiccommunity,furtheringtheideasforboththeoryandpractice.Notably,manymarketingundergraduatestudentsstarttheircareersinsales,andthusweviewtheprojectashavingpotentialbenefittomarketingprofessorswhohelpcompaniesrecruittheirstudents.

Thetwoinsightsexaminedinthisstudyarestatedasmistakescommonlymadewhenhiringsalespeople.Onemistakewasreferredtoas"Usingsuccessfulpeopleasmodels,"andreferstothenotionofhiringpeoplewhopossesscharacteristicscommontotopsalesperformers,withoutrecognizingthatthesesamecharacteristicsmaybecommonamongbottomperformers.Thus,screeningtoolsusedtorecruitsalespeoplemaybeineffectivebecausetheymayidentifythewrong"top"candidates,asthesecandidatessharecharacteristicsofbothtopandbottomperformers.Thesecondmistakewasreferredtoas"Notresearchingthereasonsthatpeoplefail,"andreferstothenotionthathiringmanagershaveabiasedperspectivewhenhiring,correctlyplacingeffortinunderstandingwhatmakessalespeoplesucceed,butfailingtoascertainwhysalespeoplehavefailed.Thismistake,whichhasbeenstudiedmuchlessintheliteratureasdemonstratedinAppendix1,mayleadahiringmanagertorecruitapersonwhoispoisedtoperformwellonsomeaspectsofthejob,butwhoisalsopoisedtofailonotheraspectsofthejob.Bothmistakesdealwithperformancefailures,andinvolveneglectingfailureissuesinthepersonnelselectionprocess.

Giventheinsightsabove,thepurposeofthispaperistoexaminetheassertionofthesemistakes.Weseektoassesstheimportanceofthetwo'commonmistakes',andmeasurethedegreetowhichtheseproblemsoccur.Further,iftheassertionsappeartobeimportantandprevalent,thenweseektodeveloprecommendationsforresearchandpracticethatwouldleadtocorrespondingimprovementsinhiringprocesses.Theremainderofthispaperisorganizedasfollows.Wediscusstheimportanceoftheseissues;whyincludingfailureissuesinscreeningmayormaynotbecriticaltomanagershiringsalespeople.WethendiscussStudy1,whichwasqualitative,andwhichledtosomevalidationoftheassertionsaboveanddevelopmentofhypothesestotestquantitatively.WethendiscussStudy2,whichentailedasurvey-basedquantitativetest,andprovidedfurthervalidationandresultedinpinpointingveryspecificareaswheremistakesoccur.Finally,wepresentconclusionsandrecommendations.

IMPORTANCEOFINCLUDINGFAILUREISSUESINSCREENING

Theimportanceoffocusingonfailureduringascreeningprocessmaybequestionedforthreereasons,eachdiscussedbelow.Questioningtheimportanceofexcludingfailureinthescreeningprocessisimportant,becauseifexcludingfailureisunimportant,thentheexclusionisappropriateratherthanmistaken.

First,insalessettingsarefailuresrareorlowincost?

Weconsiderafailuretobeanemployeewhofailstoachieveminimumworkrelatedgoals,orwhodecidestoleavethecompanysothecostoftherecruitmenteffortisinsufficientlyrecovered.Ifvirtuallyallrecruitedsalespeoplewerelaterdeemedasnon-failures,thenspendingtimeidentifyingpotentialfailureswouldbewasteful,astheirlikelihoodofoccurringwouldbeverylow.Also,ifthecostofrecruitmentislow,thenagainspendingtimewithfailureissueswouldbewasteful,asahirethatresultsinfailurecouldbereplacedinexpensivelywithanotherhire.Forthis"arefailuresrareorlowincost"question,wenoteresearchindicatesfailureratesinsalespositionsarehighbothinabsolutesenseandrelativetoothertypesofpositions(Richardson1999),andthatcostsofreplacingfailingemployeeshavelongbeenassessedashigh(Rosenberg,GibsonandEpley1981).Further,wenoteacompanycouldhaveanemployeetheyconsidertobefailingandyetretaintheemployee;inthiscasethecostisalsohigh,asworkrelatedgoalsarenotachieved.Thus,failuresinsalessettingsarenotrare,andarecostly.

Second,doesscreeningcandidatesforsuccessessentiallyaccomplishthesameobjectiveasscreeningcandidatesforpotentialfailure?

Ifso,thenfailureissuesareaddressedthrougheffortsthatfocusonsuccess.Inresponsetothissecondquestion,wenotesuccesstypicallyisequatedtoin-roleachievements,suchassalesproductivity.Ontheotherhand,asrecognizedintheOCBliterature,extra-rolebehaviorsoftencorrelatesignificantlywithmanagers'evaluationsofsalespersonperformance,andyetmaynotbeconsciouslythoughtofassuccesselements(MacKenzie,PodsakoffandFetter1993).Thus,performanceinsomedimensionsmaydistinguishsuccessfromlackofsuccess,whereasperformanceinotherdimensionsmaydistinguishfailurefromlackoffailure.ThisnotionhasbeenappliedfrequentlyinthestudyofsatisfactionwithproductperformanceviatheKanomodel(Vargoetal.2007),whichisanalogoustosatisfactionwithemployeeperformance.Ultimately,weexpectasalespersoncouldbeclassifiedassuccessfulinbothsalesproductivityandvariousextra-roledimensions,classifiedassuccessfulinsalesproductivityandyetfailedinextra-roledimensions(orviceversa),ormaybeclassifiedasfailedinbothsalesproductivityandextra-roledimensions.Infact,evenifasalespersonisviewedassucceedingonbothsalesproductivityandextra-roledimensions,afailurecouldexistbecausethesalespersondecidedtoleavethecompanybeforethecompanysufficientlyrecoversthecostoftherecruitmenteffort.Thus,screeningforsuccessmayfocusonasubsetofcriticaldimensions,insufficientlyprotectingagainsthiringapersonwhoendsupfailingonotherimportantdimensions.

Third,aresignalsoffailureobvioustosalesmanagers,orevenpotentialsalespeople?

Inthiscase,puttinglowoverteffortintoscreeningforfailurewouldmakesense,asscreeningwouldoccurwithoutmucheffortornotice.However,researchresultsindicatesalesmanagersoftenhavemistakenimpressionsofwhyfailuresoccuramongsalespeople(LillyandPorter2003),andareunabletoanticipatewhowouldbetheworstsalespersonataratehigherthanchance(EmeryandHandell2007).Further,evensalespeoplethemselvesareoftenuncertainaboutwhatfactorshavecontributedtotheirperformance(Dixon,ForbesandSchertzer2005),andweexpectsignalsoffailurewouldbeevenlessobvioustopotentialsalespeople.Thus,weconcludethatfailuresignalsarenotsimplyobvious,andthateffortfulscreeningforfailureisimportant.

Basedontheissuesabove,ouroverallassessmentisthat:

1)salespersonfailureiscostlyandfrequent,2)screeningforpotentialsuccessmayinsufficientlyguardagainsthiringapersonwhofails,and3)effortspentscreeningforfailureislikelytobehelpful,ascausesoffailureareoftennon-obvious.Tosomeextent,theoft-repeatedadagefromWinstonChurchillapplies,specificallythatthosewhofailtostudyhistoryaredoomedtorepeatit.Inthecontextofsalespersonrecruitment,someinclusionoffailureinthescreeningprocessseemsveryimportant.

STUDY1:

QUALITATIVEASSESSMENT

WehadfourprimaryobjectivesforStudy-1whichparallelfourquestions.First,fromtheperspectiveofprofessionalsinvolvedinsalespersonrecruitment,dorecruitmenteffortsgenerallylackacomponentoflookingforissuesthatsignalpotentialfailure?

Second,ifrecruitmenteffortsreallydoomiteffortstoprobeforpotentialfailure,dopractitionersviewtheomissionasacaseoffailurebeingoverlooked,oristheomissionintendedforreasonsbeyondthethreeissuesdiscussedabove?

Third,arepost-mortemscommonlyconductedaftersalespersonfailuresoccur,inamannerwhereresultingknowledgecouldbeeasilyusedin

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 人文社科 > 法律资料

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2