服务业产业内贸易及其影响因素研究外文文献及翻译Word文档下载推荐.docx

服务业产业内贸易及其影响因素研究外文文献及翻译Word文档下载推荐.docx

《服务业产业内贸易及其影响因素研究外文文献及翻译Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《服务业产业内贸易及其影响因素研究外文文献及翻译Word文档下载推荐.docx（9页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

服务业产业内贸易及其影响因素研究外文文献及翻译@#@EconomicFragmentationandFDIinChina@#@Chinaisoneofthemostpopularinvestmentdestinationsintheworld.Throughoutmuchofthe1990s,Chinaaccountedfor50percentofforeigndirectinvestment（FDI）goingintodevelopingcountriesandinrecentyears,ChinahasbeenthesecondlargestrecipientofFDIintheworld,aftertheUnitedStates.TherecentagreementsbetweenChinaontheonehandandtheUnitedStatesandtheEuropeanUnionontheotherhandoverChina’saccessionintotheWorldTradeOrganization（WTO）mayincreaseChina’salreadyimpressiveFDIinflowssignificantly.AccordingtoaforecastbyGoldmanSachs,inthreetofouryears,China’sWTOmembershipcouldboostFDIto100billiondollarsayear,fromthecurrent40.4billiondollars.@#@ChineseofficialsandforeignbusinesspractitionershailChina’slargeFDIinflowsasoneofthemostcelebratedachievementsofthereformera.InstitutionssuchastheWorldBankhavecreditedFDIasamaindrivingforcebehindChina’seconomicsuccess.InternationalratingagenciesroutinelyuseFDIflowsasanimportantmacroeconomicindicatortoassessChina’screditworthiness.Standard&@#@Poor’s,forexample,initsmostrecentreportonChina’screditrating,cited“stronginflowsofforeigndirectinvestments”asoneofthefactorstojustifyanupgradeofChina’screditratings.AcademicresearchersareequallyenthusiasticaboutFDIflowsintoChina.TheytouttheenormousbenefitsofFDIforChina,suchastechnologytransfer,theintroductionofmarketingknow-how,capitalinfusion,etc.@#@ThisbooksetsouttodebunkmuchoftheconventionalwisdomonChina’shugeFDI@#@inflows.ThecentralclaimofthebookisthatthelargeabsorptionofFDIbyChinaisnotasignofthestrengthsofitseconomybutofitsfundamentalweaknesses.Threelinesofargumentareadvancedtosupportthisclaim.First,muchoftheexport-orientedFDI—mainlyoriginatingfromethnicChinesefirmsinHongKong,Macao,andTaiwan—materializesbecauseofthesevereliquidityconstraintsonthepartofexport-orientedindigenousChinesefirms.Theseliquidityconstraintsarisenotbecauseexport-orientedChinesefirmsareinefficientbutbecausetheyareprivateandforyearsChinesebankswereexplicitlyprohibitedfromlendingtoprivatefirms.Privatefirmshavenochoicebuttoraisefinancingintheonlywaytheycan—sellingtheirclaimsonfuturecashflowstoforeignfirms.FDIrisesasaresult.@#@Second,muchoftheFDIorientedtowardthedomesticmarket—mainlyincapital-intensiveindustries—doesnotfinancethecreationofnewcapacitybutfinancestheacquisitionofexistingassets,mainlyfromstate-ownedenterprises（SOEs）.SOEshaveaccumulatedmassivefinanciallossesandhugeliabilitiesontheirbalancesheets.TheinsolvencyofSOEsisafamiliarstory.WhatisnotfamiliaristhefactthatSOEshavebuiltupapotentiallyvaluableassetbaseduringthereformera,whichwasfinancedbyagenerousinfusionofsubsidizedcreditfromthebankingsystem.Ontopofagoodassetbase,SOEshavegeneratedpoorornegativereturns,whichrendersthempotentialacquisitiontargets.BecausetheChinesegovernmentstillrefusestoadoptaprivatizationpolicytodealwiththeSOEinsolvencysituation,theonlyviableacquirersendupbeingforeignfirms.FDIrisesonthisaccount.Third,China’scapitalandproductmarketsareseverelyfragmented,whichmeansthataChinesefirmlocatedinProvinceAcannotinvestinProvinceB.Theeconomicfragmentationgivesanenormousadvantagetoforeignfirms,whicharenotfacedbysimilarcapitalconstraints.FDIrisesonthisaccountbecauseforeignfirmscanchoosemoreprojectstoinvestinthandomesticfirms.Inbrief,FDIinflowsriseinresponsetoeithermarketgrowthopportunitiesortolabor-costsavingopportunitiesonlybecauseindigenousfirmsareuncompetitiveacross-the-boardandareunabletorespondtothesamesetofopportunities.@#@Anumberofaspectsoftheresearchsetthisprojectapartfromothers.Oneisthatanexplicittheoreticalframeworkguidesmuchoftheempiricalresearch.Thebookofferswhatistermedasan“institutionalfoundation”perspectiveonFDI.TheinstitutionalfoundationargumentbothbuildsuponanddepartsfromthedominanttheoreticalapproachinthestudiesofFDI,whichisknownastheindustrialorganizationtheoryofFDI.ThecommonalityisamicroeconomicreasoningthatFDI,asanownershiparrangement,isdesignedtoovercomecertainproblemsinherentinarms-lengthcontractualtransactions.Thedeparturehastodowithwhatconstitutesthesourcesofproblemsbesettingcontractualtransactions.Whiletheindustrialorganizationtheoryfocusesonmarketfailuresinvolvedintransactionsofcertainresourcesendowedwithuniquecharacteristics（suchasindivisibilityorasset-specificity）,theinstitutionalfoundationargumentfocusesonthefailuresresultingfromimperfectly-designedfinancialandeconomicinstitutionsinallocatingallgoodsandresources.Furthermore,thesefailuresarenotaresultofcharacteristicsofgoodsorresourcesbeingtransactedbutasaresultofdeliberatepolicyandpoliticalchoicesofthegovernment.@#@Theseconddeparturedirectlyfollowsfromthefirst.WhilemuchoftheworksonFDIstudiesthemotivationsandcapabilitiesofforeigninvestingfirms,thisstudytriestounderstandthemotivations,constraintsandcapabilitiesoftheChinesehostfirmsandlocalgovernments.TheempiricalemphasisisbasedonaconceptualizationofFDIthatviewsFDIasafunctionofrelative,ratherthanasabsolute,competitivenessofforeignfirms.Relativeforeigncompetitivenessis,inturn,afunctionofforeigncompetitivenessanddomesticuncompetitiveness.Assuch,studyingdomesticuncompetitivenessshouldbejustasanalyticallyrewardingasstudyingforeigncompetitiveness.ThiswayofresearchingFDIhasbeensurprisinglyrareamongexistingstudies.@#@AlthoughtheoverallobjectiveistoexplainFDIpatternsinChina,theanalyticalframeworkofthebookrevolvesaroundthedesignandoperationsofkeyeconomicandfinancialinstitutionsinChinainaffectingChina’sFDIpatterns.Assuch,thebookoffersabroadre-interpretationnotonlyofFDIinChinabutalsooftheChineseeconomicreforms.ThislatteraspectofthebookshouldinterestthosereaderswhoareinterestedinChina’sreformprocessandinthelessonsonecandrawfromtheChinesereformsrelevanttootherreformingsocialisteconomies.Inrecentyears,theChinesegradualistreformstrategyhasbeenheldupasamodelforcountriestryingtotransformthemselvesintomarketeconomies.Thisbookquestionsthisperspective.Itshowsthatthepartialreforms,whilesuccessfulinincreasingthescopeofmarket,havesofarfailedtoaddressthefundamentalinefficienciesintheChineseeconomyandonereasonwhyChinahasavertedaneconomicmeltdownisbecauseofthelargeinfusionsofFDIratherthanbecauseofthesuccessofChina’sreformstrategy.@#@Inthisworkingpaper,IonlyfocusononeoftheinstitutionalpillarsunderlyingmuchoftheFDIdevelopmentsinthe1990s.ThispaperfirstdescribesthefragmentationoftheChineseeconomy.EconomicfragmentationhasastrongbearingonChineseFDIdemand.ItreducesthesetofinvestmentopportunitiesavailabletoChinesefirms,whileincreasingthesetofinvestmentopportunitiesavailabletoforeignfirms.FDIrisesbecauseforeignfirmsaremoresuccessfulthanChinesefirmsincapturingtheseinvestmentopportunities.Thepaperpresentsbothquantitativeandcase-studyevidencetodocumentthisphenomenon.@#@MNCsarenotonlymultinational;@#@theyare,firstandforemost,multi-regionalinChina.Motorola,Schindler,Otis,Volkswagen,Ford,Nabisco,etc.haveallestablishedoperationsacrossthecountryandincreasinglyWesternMNCsarecreatingaholdingcompanystructuretocoordinatetheircomplexactivitiesandinteractionsamongtheirsubsidiariesoraffiliatesandtoeconomizeonthesharedoverheadcosts.Thesecross-regionalinvestmentsoracquisitionsarenotlimitedtotheFortune500corporations;@#@infactmuchsmallerMNCshaveactivelyacquiredassetsthroughoutthecountry.AprominentexampleistheHongKongbasedChinaStrategicInvestmentLtd.ChinaStrategicInvestment,withsalerevenueofonly84milliondollarsin1992,acquired200companiesthroughoutChinaduringaspanoftwoyearsbetween1992and1994.ItsjointventuresarelocatedinmorethannineprovincesanditsChinaTiresHoldings,viaitsacquisitionsoftireplantsinfiveprovinces,emergedtobethelargesttireproducerinChinain1994.CSIwaspoisedtobecomeoneofthelargestindustrialconglomeratesinChinauntilthecentralgovernmentintervenedtoputabrakeonitsacquisitionbidsin1995.@#@Ourquestion,asalways,is,“Whycan’tChinesecompaniesdothesame?

@#@”WealreadyprovidedoneanswerinChapter2andChapter3:

@#@BecausethegovernmenthasrefusedtoallowSOEstobeprivatized,Chinesenon-statefirmscannotacquireloss-makingSOEswhileMNCscanviawhatIcalla“JVacquisition”mechanism.ButclearlythisisnotthewholeanswerbecauseChineseSOEsdonotacquireotherSOEseither.SOEacquisitionbyotherSOEsclearlydoesnotentailanyideologicalcomplicationsandyetthistypeofacquisitionshasbeenrare,especiallyacquisitionsinvolvingfirmsfromdifferentjurisdictions.Thepaucityofacquisitionsisevenmorepuzzlingconsideringthefollowingtwofacts.First,Chinesefirmsandgovernmentagencieshavebeeninvestingmassivelytobuildnewplantsandfacilities.Between1991and1998,forthreeoutofthoseeightyears,investment/GDPratioexceeded40percentandforsixoutoftheseeightyears,theinvestment/GDPratioexceeded38percent.Reformeraissometimest