FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx

上传人:b****3 文档编号:3709127 上传时间:2023-05-06 格式:DOCX 页数:11 大小:25.15KB
下载 相关 举报
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共11页
FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共11页
亲,该文档总共11页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx

《FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译.docx

FDI在发展中国家的决定因素分析毕业论文外文文献翻译

毕业论文外文翻译

外文题目:

AnalysesofFDIdeterminantsindevelopingcountries

出处:

Economics.2009(36):

105-123.

作者:

RecepKok,BernurAcikgozErsoy

原文:

AnalysesofFDIdeterminantsindevelopingcountries

RecepKok,BernurAcikgozErsoy

ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Thepurposeofthispaperistoinvestigatethebestdeterminantsofforeigndirectinvestment(FDI)indevelopingcountries.

Design/methodology/approach:

ThispaperinvestigateswhetherFDIdeterminantsaffectFDIbasedonbothapanelofdata(FMOLS-fullymodifiedOLS)andcross-sectionSUR(seeminglyunrelatedregression)for24developingcountries,overtheperiod1983-2005forFMOLSand1976-2005forcross-sectionSUR.

Findings:

TheinteractionofFDIwithsomeFDIdeterminantshaveastrongpositiveeffectoneconomicprogressindevelopingcountries,whiletheinteractionofFDIwiththetotaldebtservice/GDPandinflationhaveanegativeimpact.ThemostimportantdeterminantofFDIisthecommunicationvariable.

Keyword

FDIdevelopingcountrydeterminant

1.Introduction

Tradehastraditionallybeentheprincipalmechanismlinkingnationaleconomiesinordertocreateaninternationaleconomy.FDIisasimilarmechanismlinkingnationaleconomies;therefore,thesetwomechanismsreinforceeachother.ThetradeeffectsofFDIdependonwhetheritisundertakentogainaccesstonaturalresources,toconsumermarketsorwhethertheFDIisaimedatexploitinglocationalcomparativeadvantageorotherstrategicassetssuchasresearchanddevelopmentcapabilities.MostdevelopingcountrieslacktechnologycapabilityandFDItofacilitatetechnologytransferandreducethetechnologygap(TGAP)betweendevelopingcountriesanddevelopedcountries.Infact,itissuggestedthatspilloversortheexternaleffectsfromFDIarethemostsignificantchannelsforthedisseminationofmoderntechnology(Blomstrom,1989).

FDIhasinnumerableothereffectsonthehostcountry'seconomy.Itinfluencestheincome,production,prices,employment,economicgrowth,developmentandgeneralwelfareoftherecipientcountry.Itisalsoprobablyoneofthemostsignificantfactorsleadingtotheglobalizationoftheinternationaleconomy.Thus,theenormousincreaseinFDIflowsacrosscountriesisoneoftheclearestsignsoftheglobalizationoftheworldeconomyoverthepast20years(UNCTAD,2006).Therefore,wecanconcludethatFDIisakeyingredientforsuccessfuleconomicgrowthindevelopingcountries,becausetheveryessenceofeconomicdevelopmentistherapidandefficienttransferandadoptionof“bestpractice”acrossborders.

Ontheotherhand,ingeneral,foreigninvestorsareinfluencedbythreebroadgroupsoffactors:

Theprofitabilityoftheprojects.

Theeasewithwhichsubsidiaries'operationscanbeintegratedintoinvestors'globalstrategies.

Theoverallqualityofthehostcountry'senablingenvironment.

AlargenumberofstudieshavebeenconductedtoidentifythedeterminantsofFDIbutnoconsensushasemerged,inthesensethatthereisnowidelyacceptedsetofexplanatoryvariablesthatcanberegardedasthe“true”determinantsofFDI.TheresultsproducedbystudiesofFDIaretypicallysensitivetothesefactors,indicatingalackofrobustness.Forexample,factorssuchaslaborcosts,tradebarriers,tradebalance,exchangerate,R&DandtaxhavebeenfoundtohavebothnegativeandpositiveeffectsonFDI.Chakrabarti(2001)concludesthat“therelationbetweenFDIandmanyofthecontroversialvariables(namely,tax,wages,openness,exchangerate,tariffs,growthandtradebalance)arehighlysensitivetosmallalterationsintheconditioninginformationset”.

Theimportantquestionis“Whydocompaniesinvestabroad?

”Dunning(1993)developedhistheorybysynthesizingthepreviouslypublishedtheories,becauseexistingexplanationscouldnotfullyjustifytheexistenceofFDI.AccordingtoDunning,internationalproductionistheresultofaprocessaffectedbyownership,internalizationandlocalizationadvantages.

Thelatteristhemostimportant:

thefactorsbasedonwhichaninvestorselectsalocationforaproject.Theseincludethefactorsaffectingtheavailabilityoflocalinputssuchasnaturalresources,thesizeofthemarket,geographicallocation,thepositionoftheeconomy,theculturalandpoliticalenvironment,factorprices,transportcostsandcertainelementsoftheeconomicpolicyofthegovernment(tradepolicy,industrialpolicy,budgetpolicy,taxpolicy,etc.).

2.ThedeterminantsofFDI:

theoryandevidence

FDIhasbeenregardedinthelastdecadesasaneffectivechanneltotransfertechnologyandfostergrowthindevelopingcountries.Thispointofviewvividlycontrastswiththecommonbeliefthatwasacceptedinsomeacademicandpoliticalspheresinthe1950sand1960s,accordingtowhichFDIwasharmfulfortheeconomicperformanceoflessdevelopedcountries.ThetheoreticaldiscussionthatpermeatedpartofthedevelopmenteconomicsofthesecondhalfofthetwentiethcenturyhasbeenapproachedfromanewangleonthelightoftheNewGrowthTheory.Thus,themodelsbuiltinthisnovelframeworkprovideaninterestingbackgroundinordertostudythecorrelationbetweenFDIandthegrowthrateofGDP(CalvoandRobles,2003).

Intheneoclassicalgrowthmodeltechnologicalprogressandlaborgrowthareexogenous,inwardFDImerelyincreasestheinvestmentrate,leadingtoatransitionalincreaseinpercapitaincomegrowthbuthasnolong-rungrowtheffect(HsiaoandHsiao,2006).Thenewgrowththeoryinthe1980sendogenizestechnologicalprogressandFDIhasbeenconsideredtohavepermanentgrowtheffectinthehostcountrythroughtechnologytransferandspillover.ThereisongoingdiscussionontheimpactofFDIonahostcountryeconomy,ascanbeseenfromrecentsurveysoftheliterature(DeMello,1997,1999;Fan,2002;Lim,2001).

Accordingtotheneoclassicalgrowththeorymodel,FDIdoesnotaffectthelong-termgrowthrate.Thisisunderstandableifweconsidertheassumptionsofthemodel,namely:

constanteconomiesofscale,decreasingmarginalproductsofinputs,positivesubstitutionelasticityofinputsandperfectcompetition(Sass,2003).Withintheframeworkoftheneo-classicalmodels(Solow,1956),theimpactofFDIonthegrowthrateofoutputwasconstrainedbytheexistenceofdiminishingreturnsinthephysicalcapital.Therefore,FDIcouldonlyexertaleveleffectontheoutputpercapita,butnotarateeffect.Inotherwords,itwasunabletoalterthegrowthrateofoutputinthelongrun(CalvoandRobles,2003).

Asaconsequence,ofendogenousgrowththeory,FDIhasanewly-perceivedpotentialroleinthegrowthprocess(Bende-NabendeandFord,1998).InthecontextoftheNewTheoryofEconomicGrowth,however,FDImayaffectnotonlythelevelofoutputpercapitabutalsoitsrateofgrowth.ThisliteraturehasdevelopedvarioushypothesesthatexplainwhyFDImaypotentiallyenhancethegrowthrateofpercapitaincomeinthehostcountry(CalvoandRobles,2003).However,theendogenousgrowththeory,whichdispenseswiththeassumptionofperfectcompetition,leavesmorescopefortheimpactofFDIongrowth.Inthistheoreticalframework,investment,includingFDI,affectstherateofgrowththroughresearchanddevelopment(R&D)orthroughitsimpactonhumancapital.Evenifthereturnoninvestmentisdeclining,FDImayinfluencegrowththroughexternalities.

Particularly,FDIdisplacesdomesticsavings(Papanek,1973;Cohen,1993;ReinhartandTalvi,1998).Inaseminalpaper,Papanek(1973)showedthesignificantnegativeimpactsofdifferenttypesofcapitalonnationalsavings.Basedonasampleof85developingcountries,Papanekfoundthatforeigncapitaldisplaceddomesticsavings.Specifically,heshowedthatforeignaid,privateinvestmentandothercapitalcrowdedoutnationalsavings,andareductionindomesticsavingscouldleadtofurtherincreaseonthedependencyonforeigncapital(BaharumshahandThanoon,2006).

Anotherdeterminant,tariffs,hasapositiveeffectonFDIiftheyarecombinedwiththegrowthrateandopenness,buttheyproduceanegativeeffectwhencombinedwithwages.Therealexchangerateproducesapositiveeffectwhenitiscombinedwithopenness,domesticinvestmentandgovernmentconsumption.Whendomesticinvestmentisexcluded,theeffectbecomesnegative.

Thissupportstheargumentthatanefficientenvironmentthatcomeswithmoreopennesstotradeislikelytoattractforeignfirms.ThisconclusionisalsosupportedbyAsiedu(2002)andEdwards(1990).Inthismodel,investmenttaxandwageshaveanegativeimpactonFDI,whileinfrastructureandmarketsizehaveasignificantlypositiveimpactonFDI.Generally,onlyinthecaseofexportorientedFDI,cheaplaborintermsoflowerwagesworksasanincentive(WheelerandMody,1992).OntheotherhandTomiura'(2003)studyconfirmsthatthepositiveassociationbetweenFDIandR&DisrobusteveniffirmsundertakingnoFDIand/ornoR&Dareincluded.Inthisrespect,MorckandYeung(1991)hypothesizeandprovideevidencethatFDIcreateswealthwhenanexpandingfirmpossessesintangibleassets,suchassuperiorproductionandmanagementskills,marketingexpertise,patentsandconsumergoodwill.

3.Datadefinition

TheindicatorstestedinthisstudyareselectedonthebasisofFDItheoriesandpreviousempiricalliterature.Theindicatorstestedinthepanelstudyandcross-sectionSUR,aretheFDIdeterminantsforwhichthedatahavebeenfoundfordevelopingcountriesforatleast30years.Datasetsrelatedtoanumberofdevelopingcountriesaresometimesdiscontinuousforsomevariables(i.e.notavailableforall30years).ForthatreasonwhiledefiningthemaindeterminantsofFDIi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > PPT模板 > 图表模板

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2