考研英语阅读理解标准90篇+提高30篇Unit19.docx
《考研英语阅读理解标准90篇+提高30篇Unit19.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考研英语阅读理解标准90篇+提高30篇Unit19.docx(32页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
考研英语阅读理解标准90篇+提高30篇Unit19
Unit19
Alittleknowledgeisadangerousthing.
一知半解,自欺欺人。
学习内容
题材
词数
建议时间
得分统计
做题备忘
PartA
Text1
科普知识
419
/10
Text2
科普知识
422
/10
Text3
商业经济
462
/10
Text4
社会生活
469
/10
PartB
科普知识
524
/10
PartC
文化教育
446
/10
PartA
Directions:
Readthefollowingtexts.Answerthequestionsbloweachtextbychoosing[A],[B],[C]or[D].
Text1
Everyprofessionortrade,everyart,andeverysciencehasitstechnicalvocabulary,thefunctionofwhichispartlytorefertothingsorprocesseswhichhavenonamesinordinaryEnglish,andpartlytosecuregreaterexactnessinnomenclature.Suchspecialdialects,orjargon,arenecessaryintechnicaldiscussionofanykind.Beinguniversallyunderstoodbythedevoteesoftheparticularscienceorart,theyhavetheprecisionofamathematicalformula.Besides,theysavetime,foritismuchmoreeconomicaltonameaprocessthantodescribeit.Thousandsofthesetechnicaltermsareveryproperlyincludedineverylargedictionary,yet,asawhole,theyareratherontheoutskirtsoftheEnglishlanguagethanactuallywithinitsborders.
Differentoccupations,however,differwidelyinthecharacteroftheirspecialvocabularies.Intradesandhandicraftsandotheroccupations,suchasfarmingandfishing,thathaveoccupiedgreatnumbersofmenfromremotetimes,thetechnicalvocabularyisveryold.Itconsistslargelyofnativewords,orofborrowedwordsthathaveworkedthemselvesintotheveryfiberofourlanguage.Hence,thoughhighlytechnicalinmanyparticulars,thesevocabulariesaremorefamiliarinsound,andmoregenerallyunderstoodthanmostothertechnicalities.Thespecialdialectsoflaw,medicine,divinity,andphilosophyhavealso,intheirolderstrata,becomeprettyfamiliartocultivatedpersons,andhavecontributedmuchtothepopularvocabulary.
Yet,everyvocationstillpossessesalargebodyoftechnicaltermsthatremainessentiallyforeign,eventoeducatedspeech.Andtheproportionhasbeenmuchincreasedinthelastfiftyyears,particularlyinthevariousdepartmentsofnaturalandpoliticalsciencesandinthemechanicarts.Hencenewtermsarecoinedwiththegreatestfreedom,andabandonedwithindifferencewhentheyhaveservedtheirturn.Mostofthenewcoinagesareconfinedtospecialdiscussionsandseldomgetintogeneralliteratureorconversation.Yetnoprofessionisnowadays,asallprofessiononcewere,aclosedguild.Thelawyer,thephysician,themanofscience,andtheclericassociatefreelywithhisfellowcreatures,anddoesnotmeettheminamerelyprofessionalway.
Furthermore,whatiscalledpopularsciencemakeseverybodyacquaintedwithmodernviewsandrecentdiscoveries.Anyimportantexperiment,thoughmadeinaremoteorprovinciallaboratory,isatoncereportedinthenewspapers,andeverybodyissoontalkingaboutit—asinthecaseoftheRoentgenraysandwirelesstelegraphy.Thus,ourcommonspeechisalwaystakingupnewtechnicaltermsandmakingthemcommonplace.
1.Thelastsentencesinparagraph1showsthattechnicalterms
[A]areusedintheurbanareas.[B]areusedintheruralareas.
[C]arenotthecoreofcommonspeech.[D]arenotunderstoodbycommonpeople.
2.Whatcanbeinferredfromparagraph2and3?
[A]Technicaltermsfromremotetimesaretoooldforustounderstandtoday.
[B]Specialdialectsoflaw,medicineandsoonarerestrictedtocultivatedpeople
[C]ThewordsoftheEnglishlanguagehavechangedalotinthelastfiftyyears.
[D]Onecanneverbesurewhatawordmeanswithoutconsultinganexpert.
3.Thesentence“Yetnoprofessions…closedguilds”meansthat
[A]itismucheasiertobecomeaprofessionaltodaythanitwas.
[B]thereismorecommunicationbetweenprofessionalsandothers.
[C]popularsciencehastoldhersecretstotheworld.
[D]anyonecannowunderstandanythinginaprofession.
4.Roentgenraysandwirelesstelegraphyarementionedtoshow
[A]rapidoccurrenceofjargon.[B]rapiddisappearanceofjargon.
[C]precisionofjargoninmeaning.[D]popularfamiliaritywithjargon.
5.What’stheauthor’smainpurposeinwritingthistext?
[A]todescribeaphenomenon.[B]toargueaboutabelief.
[C]toproposeasolution.[D]tostimulateanaction.
Text2
Computerprogrammersoftenremarkthatcomputers,withaperfectlackofdiscrimination,willdoanyfoolishthingtheyaretoldtodo.Thereasonforthislies,ofcourse,inthenarrowfixationofthecomputer’s“intelligence”onthedetailsofitsownperceptionsandinitsinabilitytobeguidedbyanylargecontext.Inapsychologicaldescriptionofthecomputerintelligence,threerelatedadjectivescometomind:
single-minded,literal-minded,andsimple-minded.Recognizingthis,weshouldatthesametimerecognizethatthissingle-mindedness,literal-mindedness,andsimple-mindednessalsocharacterizestheoreticalmathematics,thoughtoalesserextent.
Sincesciencetriestodealwithreality,eventhemostprecisesciencesnormallyworkwithmoreorlessimperfectlyunderstoodapproximationstowardwhichscientistsmustmaintainanappropriateskepticism.Thus,forinstance,mathematiciansmaybesurprisedtolearnthattheSehrodingerequationforthehydrogenatomisnotaliterallycorrectdescriptionofthisatombutonlyanapproximationtoasomewhatmorecorrectequationwhichtakesaccountofspin,magneticdipole,andrelativisticeffects.Theymayalsobeshockedtoseethiscorrectedequationisitselfonlyanimperfectapproximationtoaninfinitesetofquantumfieldtheoreticalequations.Physicists,lookingattheoriginalSehrodingerequation,learntosenseinitthepresenceofmanyinvisibletermsinadditiontothedifferentialtermsvisible,andthissenseinspiresanentirelyappropriatedisregardforthepurelytechnicalfeaturesoftheequation.Thisveryhealthyskepticismisforeigntothemathematicalapproach.
Mathematicsmustdealwithwell-definedsituations.Thus,mathematiciansdependonanintellectualeffortoutsideofmathematicsforthecrucialspecificationoftheapproximationthatmathematicsistotakeliterally.Givemathematiciansasituationthatistheleastbitill-defined,andtheywillmakeitwell-defined,perhapsappropriately,butperhapsinappropriately.Insomecases,themathematicians’literal-mindednessmayhaveunfortunateconsequences.Themathematiciansturnthescientists’theoreticalassumptions,thatis,theirconvenientpointsofanalyticalemphasisintoaxioms,andthentaketheseaxiomsliterally.Thisbringsthedangerthattheymayalsopersuadethescientiststotaketheseaxiomsliterally.Thequestion,centraltothescientificinvestigationbutintenselydisturbinginthemathematicalcontext—whathappensiftheaxiomsarerelaxed?
—istherebyignored.
Thephysicistrightlydreadspreciseargument,sinceanargumentthatisconvincingonlyifitispreciselosesallitsforceiftheassumptionsonwhichitisbasedareslightlychanged,whereasanargumentthatisconvincingthoughimprecisemaywellbestableundersmalldisturbancesofitsunderlyingassumptions.
6.Theauthordiscussescomputersinthefirstparagraphprimarilyinorderto
[A]provethatcomputerscarryouttasksinamechanicalway.
[B]discusscomputersfromthepsychologicaltermstoexplainitsfeatures.
[C]comparetheworkofmathematicianswiththatofcomputerprogrammers.
[D]illustratehisviewsabouttheapproachofmathematicianstoproblemsolving.
7.Scientistsareskepticaltowardtheirequationsbecausethey
[A]areunabletoexpresstheirdataintermsofmultiplevariables.
[B]knowwell-definedproblemsareoftenthemostdifficulttosolve.
[C]worktoexplainreal,ratherthantheoreticalorsimplifiedsituations.
[D]areunabletoacceptmathematicalexplanationsofnaturalphenomena.
8.Theauthorsuggeststhattheapproachofphysiciststosolvingscientificproblemsis
[A]harmfultoscientificprogress.
[B]practicalforscientificpurposes.
[C]effective,butrarelyrecognizedassuch.
[D]helpful,butoflittlelong-termvalue.
9.Whydomathematicianspresentadangertoscientists?
[A]Scientistsmaycometobelievethataxiomaticstatementsareuntrue.
[B]Scientistsmaybegintoprovideimprecisebutconvincingarguments.
[C]Mathematiciansmayconvincescientiststhattheoreticalassumptionsarefacts.
[D]Scientistsmaydefinesituationsinanincomprehensiblewaytomathematicians.
10.Fromthelastparagraph,theassumptionmadebyscientistsaboutscientificargumentsisthat
[A]thepremisesonwhichtheargumentsarebasedmaychange.
[B]theargumentsprobablywillbeconvincingonlytootherscientists.
[C]theconclusionsoftheargumentsdonotnecessarilyfollowfromtheirpremises.
[D]theargumentsnecessarilyignorethecentralquestionofscientificinvestigation.
Text3
Therehewas—America’sfirstpresidentwithaMBA,themanwholovestoboastabouthisbusinessbackground,whosepresidentialcampaignraisedunprecedentedsumsfromcorporatewalletsandwhosecabinetisstuffedwithchiefexecutives—standingbefore700pinstripedtitansinaNewYorkhotelballroom,dressingthemdown.FaithintheintegrityofAmericanbusinessleaderswasbeingundermined,GeorgeBushsaidfiercely,byexecutives“breachingtrustandabusingpower”.Itwastimefor“anewethicofpersonalresponsibilityinthebusinesscommunity”.Hewasgoingto“endthedaysofcookingthebooks,shadingthetruthandbreakingourlaws”
Onlymonthsago,theideathatMr.BushwouldpubliclylambasteAmerica’scorporatebosseswaslaughable.Asacandidate,borneonthewaveofadecade-longeconomicboomandanunprecedented18-yearbullmarket,hecashedinonAme