Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx
《Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx(20页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
![Application of Topology Size and Shape Optimization Methods in Polymer Metal Hybrid Structural.docx](https://file1.bingdoc.com/fileroot1/2023-5/8/df5eeaaf-ba09-4978-9bc2-f265879dfa9b/df5eeaaf-ba09-4978-9bc2-f265879dfa9b1.gif)
ApplicationofTopologySizeandShapeOptimizationMethodsinPolymerMetalHybridStructural
ApplicationofTopology,SizeandShapeOptimizationMethodsinPolymerMetalHybridStructuralLightweightEngineering
Abstract
Applicationoftheengineeringdesignoptimizationmethodsandtoolstothedesignofautomotivebody-in-white(BIW)structuralcomponentsmadeofpolymermetalhybrid(PMH)materialsisconsidered.Specifically,theuseoftopologyoptimizationinidentifyingtheoptimalinitialdesignsandtheuseofsizeandshapeoptimizationtechniquesindefiningthefinaldesignsisdiscussed.TheoptimizationanalysesemployedwererequiredtoaccountforthefactthattheBIWstructuralPMHcomponentinquestionmaybesubjectedtodifferentin-serviceloadsbedesignedforstiffness,strengthorbucklingresistanceandthatitmustbemanufacturableusingconventionalinjectionover-molding.Thepaperdemonstratestheuseofvariousengineeringtools,i.e.aCADprogramtocreatethesolidmodelofthePMHcomponent,ameshingprogramtoensuremeshmatchingacrossthepolymer/metalinterfaces,alinear–staticanalysisbasedtopologyoptimizationtooltogenerateaninitialdesign,anonlinearstatics-basedsizeandshapeoptimizationprogramtoobtainedthefinaldesignandamold-fillingsimulationtooltovalidatemanufacturabilityofthePMHcomponent.
Keywords
Topology,Optimization,HybridStructural,LightweightEngineering
1.Introduction
Lightweightengineeringforautomobilesisprogressivelygaininginimportanceinviewofrisingenvironmentaldemandsandever-tougheremissionsstandards.Currenteffortsintheautomotivelightweightengineeringinvolveatleastthefollowingfivedistinctapproaches[1]:
(a)Requirementlightweightengineeringwhichincludeseffortstoreducethevehicleweightthroughreductionsincomponent/subsystemrequirements(e.g.areducedrequiredsizeofthefueltank);(b)Conceptuallightweightengineeringwhichincludesthedevelopmentandimplementationofnewconceptsandstrategieswithpotentialweightsavingssuchastheuseofaself-supportingcockpit,astraightenginecarrier,etc.;(c)Designlightweightengineeringwhichfocusesondesignoptimizationoftheexistingcomponentsandsub-systemssuchastheuseofribsandcomplexcrosssectionsforenhancedcomponentstiffnessatareducedweight;(d)Manufacturinglightweightengineeringwhichutilizesnovelmanufacturingapproachestoreducethecomponentweightwhileretainingitsperformance(e.g.acombinedapplicationofspotweldingandadhesivebondingtomaintainthestiffnessofthejoinedsheet-metalcomponentswithreducedwallthickness);and(e)Materiallightweightengineeringwhichisbasedontheuseofmaterialswithahighspecificstiffnessand/orstrengthsuchasaluminumalloysandpolymer-matrixcompositesorasynergisticuseofmetallicandpolymericmaterialsinahybridarchitecture(referredtoaspolymermetalhybrids,PMHs,intheremainderofthismanuscript).Inthepresentwork,theproblemofintegrationoftheengineeringoptimizationmethodsandtoolsintotheaforementionedlightweightengineeringefforts,specificallyintoPMHtechnologyforbody-in-white(BIW)load-bearingautomotivecomponentsprocessedbytechniquessuchasinjectionover-molding[2]ormetalover-molding[3].Suchcomponentsaretypicallydesignedforstiffnessandbucklingresistanceandtheirperformanceisgreatlyaffectedbythedesignoftheplasticribbingstructureinjectionmoldedintoasheet-metalstamping.
Inconventionalautomotivemanufacturingpractice,metalsandplasticsarefiercecompetitors.ThePMHtechnologies,incontrast,aspiretotakefulladvantageofthetwoclassesofmaterialsbycombiningtheminasinglecomponent/sub-assembly.Thefirstexampleofasuccessfulimplementationofthistechnologicalinnovationinpracticewasreportedattheendof1996,whenthefrontendoftheAudiA6(madebyEcia,Audincourt/France)wasproducedasahybridstructure,combiningsheetsteelwithelastomer-modifiedpoly-amidePA6-GF30(DurethanBKV130fromBayer).Akeyfeatureofhybridstructuresisthatthematerialsemployedcomplementeachothersothattheresultinghybridmaterialcanofferanenhancedoverallstructuralperformance.
Currently,PMHsarereplacingall-metalstructuresinautomotivefront-endmodulesatanacceleratedrateandarebeingusedininstrument-panelandbumpercross-beams,doormodules,andtailgatesapplications.Moreover,newPMHtechnologiesarebeing
introduced.
ThemainPMHtechnologiescurrentlybeingemployedintheautomotiveindustrycanbegroupedintothreemajorcategories:
(a)Injectionover-moldingtechnologies[2];(b)Metal-over-moldingtechnologiescombinedwithsecondaryjoiningoperations[3];and(c)Adhesively-bondedPMHs[4].AdetaileddescriptionforeachofthesegroupsofPMHmanufacturingtechnologiescanbefoundinourrecentwork[5].
Theobjectiveofthepresentworkistoextendtheaforementionedtwo-stepoptimizationapproachtoBIWloadbearingPMHcomponents.Atypicalall-metalBIWloadbearingcomponent,Figure1(a),consistsoftwoflangedU-shapestampingsjoinedalongtheirmatchingflangesbyspot-welding(oftencomplementedbyadhesivebonding).Whensuchanall-metalcomponentisreplacedwithaPMHcomponent,Figure1(b),oneofitsstampingsisremovedandtheexterioroftheremainingstampingreinforcedusinganinjection-moldedthermoplasticrib-likestructure.Hence,theobjectiveofthepresentworkistoaddresstheoptimalarchitectureoftheribbingstructurewithrespecttodifferentloadingrequirements(axialcompression,bending,twisting)anddifferentdesignrequirements(e.g.stiffness,strength,bucklingresistance).Theexamplesconsideredshowhowtopologyoptimizationmaybeusedtosuggestgoodinitialdesigns,butalsodemonstrateshowatopologyoptimizationfollowedbyadetailedsizeandshapeoptimizationmaybeusedtoprovideefficientdesignssatisfyingperformanceandmanufacturingconstraints.
Fig.1(a)Atwin-shellall-metalrearcross-roofmemberand(b)itspolymermetalhybridcounterpartconsistingasinglemetal-shellstampingandinjection-moldedplasticribbing.
Theorganizationofthepaperisasfollows:
Anoverviewofthebasicsoftopology,
sizeandshapeoptimizationmethodsispresentedandabriefdescriptionofthemaincomputationaltoolsusedinthepresentworkisgiveninSectionII.TheresultsobtainedinthepresentworkarepresentedanddiscussedinSectionIII.ThemainconclusionsresultingfromthepresentworkaresummarizedinSectionIV.
2.ComputationProcedure
2.1TheBasicsofStructuralTopology,SizeandShapeOptimization
Structuraloptimizationisaclassofengineeringoptimizationproblemsinwhichthe
evaluationofanobjectivefunction(s)orconstraintsrequirestheuseofstructural
analyses(typicallyafiniteelementanalysis,FEA).Incompactform,theoptimization
problemcanbesymbolicallydefinedas:
Minimizetheobjectivefunctionf(x)
Subjecttothenon-equalityconstraintsg(x)<0andtotheequalityconstraints
h(x)=0
WherethedesignvariablesxbelongtothedomainD
where,ingeneral,g(x)andh(x)arevectorfunctions.Thedesignvariablesxformavectorofparametersdescribingthegeometryofaproduct.Forexample,x,f(x)
g(x)andh(x)canbeproductdimensions,productweight,astressconditiondefiningtheonsetofplasticyielding,andconstraintsonproductdimensions,respectively.
TopologyOptimization
Topologyoptimizationmethodsallowthechangesinthewaysubstructuresareconnectedwithinafixeddesigndomainandcanbeclassifiedas(a)discreteelement
(alsoknownasthegroundstructure)approach;and(b)continuumapproaches.Inthe
discreteelementapproach,thedesigndomainisrepresentedasafinitesetofpossible
locationsofdiscretestructuralmemberssuchastruss,frame,andpanels.Byvaryingthewidth/thicknessofeachmemberinthedesigndomainbetweenzero(inthiscasetheelementbecomesnonexistent)andacertainmaximumvalue,structureswithdifferentsizesandtopologiescanberepresented.Inthecontinuumapproach,thedesigndomainisrepresentedasthecontinuummixtureofamaterialand“void”andtheoptimaldesignisdefinedwithrespecttothedistributionsofthematerialdensitywithinthedesignspace.Sincethediscreteelementapproachutilizesacollectionofprimitivestructuralmembers,itallowseasyinterpretationoftheconceptualdesign.However,potentiallyoptimaltopologiesmaynotbeattainablebythenumberandtypesofpossiblememberlocationsdefinedinthedesigndomain.Thecontinuumapproach,ontheotherhand,doesnothavethislimitation,whileitmaybecomputationallymoreexpensive.Overthelastdecades,majoradvanceshavebeenreportedintheareaofthediscreteelementstructuraloptimization[6-10].
SizeOptimization
Withinsizeoptimizationapproach,thedimensionsthatdescribeproductgeometryare
usedasdesignvariables,x.Theapplicationofsizeoptimizationis,consequently,mostlyusedatthedetaileddesignstagewhereonlythefinetuningofproductgeometryisnecessary.Sizeoptimizationistypicallydoneinconjunctionwithfeature-basedvariationgeometry[11]whichisavailableinmanymodernCADprograms.Withpresent-dayavailabilityoffastpersonalcomputers,sizeoptimizationisrelativelyastraightforwardtaskandittypicallyrequiresnore-meshingofthefiniteelementmodelsduringoptimizationiterations.Adifficultymayarise,however,whenextremelylargefiniteelementmodelsorhighlynonlinearphenomenaneedtobeanalyzed,inwhichcasesurrogate(simplified)modelsaretypicallyemployed.
ShapeOptimization
Shapeoptimizationallowsthecha