globlization.docx
《globlization.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《globlization.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
![globlization.docx](https://file1.bingdoc.com/fileroot1/2023-4/29/8f1ed626-26a5-45cd-9c52-b6902a5f63d7/8f1ed626-26a5-45cd-9c52-b6902a5f63d71.gif)
globlization
EB4602THEESSAY
Submittedby:
TerryJiRuan
TUTOR:
MunLingShields
DEADLINE:
25-01-2009
DepartmentofLanguagesandInternationalStudies
UniversityofCentralLancashire
MAIBC
Thesecondtopicofthewriting:
TheoriespresentedbyHofstedeandTrompenaarswereprimarilybasedonverylargesurveysconductedinmanycountries.Discusstherelevanceoftheirconceptsandclassificationsinthecontextoftoday's"globalvillage".
TheInvisibleBordersinthe"Globalvillage"
Duringthelastthreedecades,thewholeworldhasincreasinglypromotedconnectionsandcooperationtosuchadegreethatthe"globalvillage"seemstobenotacatchwordanylonger.GlobalvillageisatermcoinedbyWyndhamLewisinhisbookAmericaandCosmicMan(1948),whichcanberegardedasatermfordescribingtheworldasaplacewherepeopleareconsideredtoliveinaplanetwithoutbordersorboundaries.Timeandspaceshrink,distancesareshortened;thewholeworldbecomesasmall"village".Peoplecantraveltoanywhereveryquickly;cansharethesameenjoyment;canconsumethesamefoods,thesameservicesandthesameproductsfromallovertheworld.
But,istheplanetweliveina“globalvillage”now?
Itseemsthatwearejumpingtooearlytothisconclusionbecauseofculturaldifferences,whichbecomethe"invisibleborders",impactonalmostallaspectsoftheglobalizationprocessandenlargethedistanceamongpeople.Themoreglobal,themoreculturematterswewillmeet.Nomatterpeopledointernationaltrade,travelandstudyoverseas,workinaninternationalteamorshareinformationbyusingtheinternet,peoplefindmoreandmoreculturalclashesandderivativeconflictsaroundthem,whichmaybringalotoftroublesbothintheirlifeandtheirwork.
GeertHofstedecallsculturethe"softwareofthemind"(Hofstede,2003).Inotherwords,whilehumanbeingsallhavethesame"hardware",thehumanbrain,our"software”or"programming"isverydifferent.SomepeoplemayberunningWindowsXP,somemayberunningWindowsVista,andsomemayberunningLinux.Itisfineforyourcomputertorunprogramsforyouroperatingsystembutwhenyouwanttorunprogramsforanothersystemonthiscomputer,youwillgeterrormessages!
Itisthesameexperiencewhenyouinteractwithsomeonefromadifferentculture–theirwords,rules,tacitmodels,assumptions,gestures,manners,values,andotheraspectsoftheirculturewillnotmakesensewhentransferredtoyourframeofreference.
Therearethreeindispensableconditionsfortheworldtobecomeaglobalvillage:
themodernizationofcommunicationnetworks,high-speedtraffic,andculturalblending.Obviously,inrecentyears,themodernizationofcommunicationnetworksandthehigh-speedtraffichavebeendevelopingdramatically.Particularly,newerinformationandcommunicationsystemsarebindingtheworldtogetherinunprecedentedways. Interactionbetweencommunities,regionsandcountrieshasthusbeengreatlyenhanced.
However,therearestilltoomanyculturalclashesandderivativeconflictswhichcanbecalledthe"invisibleborders",bringingsomuchtroubletoallaspectsofpeople'sliveintoday'sglobalizedcircumstances.Inotherwords,intermsofthemodernizationofcommunicationnetworksandhigh-speedtrafficsystem,thisworldisquitelikea“globalvillage”,butintermsoftheculturalclashesandderivativeconflicts,itisnotappropriatetocalltheworlda“globalvillage”becausethe"invisibleborders"separatethepeopleinthe"village"whichisnomoreglobal.
Inthisessay,theimpactofculturaldifferencesinthe"globalvillage”willbediscussedfromtheaspectsofinternationalbusiness,internationalhumanresource,internationaltravellinganddiplomacy,thensomesuggestionsforbuildingthe“globalvillage”intoday'sglobalizingworldwillbegiven.
Intermsofinternationalbusiness,itseemsthatwearelivinginaglobalvillagewheremanagerscanmorerapidlytravel.Or,withoutleavingourcountry,evenourhome,wecanworkforaforeign-ownedcompany,buyrawmaterialsabroad,sellproductstonon-nativecustomersandhaveregularconferencecallswithourcolleaguesfromallovertheworld.
However,wehavetoknowthat,ifwelivedinarealglobalvillage,wewouldbeabletocommunicateeasilycrosscultureswithoutthe"invisibleborders".Thereductioninphysicaldistancehasmadeusmoreawareofculturaldifferenceswhicharestillabigbarrierforbusinessmen.Afewyearsago,IworkedforsomeceramicfactoriesinChinaasapart-timetranslatorandwhatproveddifficultwasnotthetranslation,buttheembarrassingsituationsIhadtoconfrontveryoftenbecausetheChinesebossesalwaysaskedmetotelltheforeigncustomerstochangethecontracts.Theproductshadtobemodifiedbecauseofsometechnologicalproblems.Theshippingdatehadtobedelayedbecausewewerehavingsomanyordersonhand;thepriceshadtobeincreasedbecausethematerialshadbecomemoreexpensive,etc.ThecustomersweresoannoyedbyourexplanationsandeverytimeIwasveryembarrassed.TheChinesebossesalwaysthinkthatthesituationhaschangedanditisimpossibleandunreasonabletofollowthecontracts.Otherwisethecustomerswillbeconsideredasunfriendlyandevenheartless.ButaccordingtothecustomersfromWesterncultures,aruleisarule,adealisadeal,noonecanchangeit.Trompenaarscallsituniversalism,whiletheChinesecultureisconsideredasparticularism(TrompenaarsandHampden-Turner,1993:
45).Universalism-Purticularismelucidatesthetwocontrastingstrategiesofdevelopingcorecompetenceandgettingclosetothecustomer.Thatistosay,relationshipisveryimportanttoChinesebusinessmen.Itmayincludenotonlyjointlydevelopedstrategiesandsharedsecretsbutalso"helpeachother"whichmeans"flexibleinreaction".Accordingtothisculturedimension,foranotherexample,manyChinesepeoplemayspendalotofmoneyonestablishingrelationshipswiththecustomers,likebigdinners,goodentertainmentandvaluablegifts,inordertogetparticularinteraction,butthatwouldbenotnecessaryandsometimehasnegativeresultsasmostWesternersdonotthinkthesameway.Theyprefertheruleof“businessisbusiness”torelationships.
Additionally,accordingtoHofstede’sfifthculturedimension,"long-versus,short-termorientation",thevalueoflong-termorientationwouldbe“Relationshipsorderedbystatusandthisorderobserved.”“Mostimportanteventsinlifewilloccurinfuture.”“…consider‘persistent’animportantpersonalitytrait.”sotheChinesebusinessmentrytheirbesttoentertaintheircustomersverywellinordertogetafirmandlongtermrelationshipwiththecustomerssothattheycangetbenefitinthefutureeventhoughtheydonothavebenefitatpresent.However,somecustomersfromtheWestvaluethepresentbenefitandmaythinkbuildingparticularrelationshipakindofcorruption.Apparently,culturaldifferencesoftenbecomethebarrierofbusinesscommunication.
Also,someWesterncustomerscomplainthatChinesebusinessmenareimpolitebecausetheydonotlookatyoureyeswhentheyshakehandswithyou.ButaccordingtothevalueofsomeChinesepeople,lookingatsomeone’seyesometimesmightbeakindofchallenge.Moreover,whenaChinesepersonmeetmanypeople,heorshewouldhaseyecontactwitheveryonewhenheorsheshakeshandswithoneofthem,asheorsheneedtoshowhisorherfriendlinesstoallthepeople.Inthiscircumstance,theChinesecandomanythingsatatime,whichiscalled"synchronoustime”,whilesomeWesternculturesdoonlyoneactivityatatime,whichiscalled"sequentialtime"(TrompenaarsandHampden-Turner,1993).
CulturalclashesnotonlyhappenbetweentheWesternandtheEasternbutalsoamongtheWesterncountries.WhenGermansdobusinessesinItaly,cultureshocksmayoccurbecausetheGermanCultureis"sequentialtime"whiletheItaliancultureismorelike"synchronoustime".AGermanmaybeannoyedbysomeinterruptingofphonecallsoraskingforsignaturewhenheishavingameetinginItalywithsomeItalianbusinessmen(TrompenaarsandHampden-Turner,1993).
Globalbusinessisaveryimportantsymbolof"globalvillage".However,therearetoomanyculturalclashesandconflictsamongthebusinessmen,justlikeinvisibleborders,separatingthemfromcooperatingwitheachotherfurther.
Intermsofglobalhumanresource,theworkforcehasbecomemoremulticulturalasaresultofglobalizationaswell.Organizationsareamixofpeoplefromdifferentculturalbackgroundswhohavetounderstandeachother,interactonadailybasisandoftenworkinmorethanonecountry.Understandingculturaldiversity,aswellastheneedtocommunicateeffectivelyacrossculturaldivideshasbecomeimperativeifwearetocompeteeffectivelyintheglobalmarketplace.
Forinstance,inaninternationalteam,Chinesecolleaguesmaycontactyouanddiscussyourworkoutofworkingtimeandevenatmidnight.Astheyareinahighcollectivismculture,Chinesecolleaguesmayplacethesociety,companyorfamilyabovetheirownselves.Thereforetheymaynotcareaboutpersonaltimeandfreedomsomuch(Hofstede,G.H.2003:
51).ButthatwouldreallyannoysomeWesternworkersfromahighindividualismculturewhichcaresaboutpersonaltimeandfreedomverymuch.Culturalclashesandderivativeconflictsoccur,whichmayinfluencetheunityandeffectivenessofthecompany.
AKoreanclassmatetoldmeastory:
anAmericanteacherteachingEnglishinanuniversityinKoreahada"badreputation"amongtheKoreanstudentsandteachers,becauseheoftentouchedtheshouldersandwaistsofthefemaleteachersandgirlsinhisclas