A Brief Logical Analysis of Humor LanguageWord格式文档下载.docx
《A Brief Logical Analysis of Humor LanguageWord格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《A Brief Logical Analysis of Humor LanguageWord格式文档下载.docx(9页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
humor;
production;
interaction
1.Introduction
Humor,asapartofourlife,isacomplexdynamicsystem.Inaboardersense,humorisreflectedinallaspectsofoursociallife.Inanarrowersense,humoroftenrevealsthegeneralweaknessesoftheordinarypersonbut,withhumor,whatwouldoffendorcausepityinreallifecanberidiculouswithoutharm,sincetheaudiencelaughsnotatarealpersonbutacharacterwhotypifiesuglinessorbaseness.Moreover,humorhasitssoothingpower.Itinstantlytakesusawayevenifformomentsfromourtroublesandmakesthemeasiertobearanditgivesuspowerandanewperspective.Thiswaywegainachancetorelaxournerves,toreadjustourattitudestowardsourlifeandeventoourselves.
Humorhasbeenstudiedbypsychologists,physiologists,philosophersandlinguistsalike.Myinterestwillfocusonthefunnyeffectcausedbythedifferentperspectivesassumedbythetwospeakersinaconversation:
somethingthatwemaycall"
interactionalhumor."
Theword"
interactional"
standsfortherelationshipbetweenexecutantsandrespondentandbetweenthesuppositionsandentailmentsthatarethepragmaticorlogicalbasisoftheirrelationship.SinceIwillconductanalysisfromtheperspectiveoflogictoexplorehowhumorouseffectiscreated,Ibelievethatknowledgeoflogicwillillustratewhatislogicallywronginhumorouspiecesaswellasdeviantmodesofthinkingasreflectedinthem.Withtheseanalyses,wemayknowmoreabouthumor'
smechanisminsteadofmerelygettingfunfromit.
Asforthetheoreticalbasisofthepaper,mylogicalanalysiswillinvolvetwocorrelatedsub-perspectives:
violationsofthefundamentallogicallaws,anddifferentiationsfromhabitualmodesofthinking.Theformerstandsatthe"
surface"
levelinanalyzingillogicallanguage,whilethelatteratthe"
deep"
levelinanalyzingthemodeofthinkingthatgiverisetoillogicalutterances.Aristotleastherealfounderofthestudyoflogicdescribesthreelawsasthebasisofallvalidlogic:
theLawofIdentity(AisA),theLawofNon-contradiction(AcannotbebothAandnotA),andtheLawofExcludedMiddle(AmustbeeitherAornotA).Thesearefundamentallawsguidinghumanthinking.Ourthoughtshouldbeconsistent,definiteandclearincommunication.Somehumorproductions,however,seemridiculousexactlybecausetheyviolateoneormoreoftheselawsdeliberatelyorunconsciously.
2.CloseRelationshipbetweenLogic,LanguageandHumor
SincetheclassicalperiodinGreece,philosophershaveconcernedthemselveswiththenatureofhumorandthecausesoflaughter.Yet,afterthousandsofyearsspenttryingtounderstandhumor,thereisstillagreatdealofcontroversiesaboutitsmechanism.
Thecloserelationbetweenlanguageandlogicformstherootoftheinteractionbetweenhumorandlogic.ThequestionoftherelationshipbetweenlanguageandthoughthashauntedthephilosopherseversincethetimeofancientGreeceandhasbeenachallengetolinguists,psychologistsandanthropologistsalike.TheviewthatlanguageisthematerialappearanceofthoughtandthoughtsareexpressedinamentallanguagedatesbacktothetimeofPlato.Itiscommonlyacknowledgedthataspeaker'
srealintentioncanbeknownthroughhisownlanguage.Theremustbesomelogicalprinciplestoguidetheexpressionineachdiscourse.Logicalinconsistencyisakeyelementofhumorleadingtoalaugh.
Inanalyzinghumor,logicalmechanismisalsooneelementofthesixknowledgeresources(KR)whichisthecentralideaoftheGeneralTheoryofVerbalHumor(GTVH)presentedbyAttardo(2001).Acomplexpresupposition,afalsesyllogism,themismanagementofbecauseandtherefore,andcirclinglogicsareallthelogicaltriggerstohumor.
3.LogicalAnalysisofHumor
Logicaldeviationsometimesoccursateachleveloflogicalthinking,whichincludesfaultyreasoning,viciouscircles,falseanalogyandfalsesyllogism.Thissectionwillnarrowthescopedownbyrestrictinganalysistotheincongruity-basedhumorwherelikelihood,logicalmalpracticeconcerningtheviolationoflogicallaws,falseanalogytogetherwithunexpectedresultfromlogicalinferencefunctioninthehumorouseffect.
3.1ViolationoftheLawofIdentity
AccordingtotheLawofIdentity,anythingisalwaysconsistentwithitself.Itsaysthatthethingswerefertoinourcommunicationshouldbethesameones.Theformulaofthislawis:
AisA.Areferstoanyconceptionorproposition.Thatistosay,inthesamecontext,thesamemeaningshouldbeexpressedthroughthesamesemanticexpression.Humormayarisewhenthelawofidentityisnotfollowed.Commonmistakesofthisviolationincludeconceptconfusion,conceptsubstitution,topicsubstitutionortopicdivergence.
3.1.1ConceptConfusion
Everyconcepthasitownintentionandextension.Conceptconfusionoccurswhentheintensionandtheextensionoftheconceptchange.Therealconnotationdiffersalthoughapparentlythesameliteralexpressionisused.Theincongruityleadstohumor.
Example1:
Theteacherasksthestudents:
"
What'
sthehalfofeight?
"
Onestudentanswersquickly:
Itshouldbetwozeros."
Thenanotherstudentsaid:
That'
stheanswerforbeingdividedupsideanddownside.Thereshouldbetwothreesifitwasdividedfromrighttoleft."
Thesetwostudentshaveconfusedthereferenceoftheword"
eight"
.The"
intheteacher'
squestionreferstothefigure.Butthestudent'
sperspectiveisthattheylooktheeightasthefigureitself.Theymakeconfusionbetweenthefigureitselfandthefigurereferredto.Itisareferentialambiguityscriptjoke.
3.1.2ConceptSubstitution
Conceptsubstitutionmeansthatthespeakersubstitutestherealmeaningofoneconceptforaspecificsituation,andusesitindicatinganothermeaningwhichisquitedifferentwiththepreviousone.Thecontrastofthesetwoconnotationsofthesameexpressioncreatesanincongruityandmakeslaughter.
Example2:
Employer:
Forthisjobwewantaresponsibleman.
Applicant:
Thenyouwantme.EverywhereI'
veworkedwhensomethingwentwrongtheysaidIwasresponsible.
Responsibleman"
meansthepersonshouldbestrictwithhisjob,andensurethathisworkiswellqualified.Buttheapplicant'
sunderstandingisnotinconformitywiththis.Whathesaystellsthatheshouldbeartheresponsibilityforhismistakes,andthatindicatesthatheiscareless,withoutasenseofresponsibility.Infact,thesame"
responsible"
carriestheoppositemeaning.Theambiguityofthewordgivesthechoiceofsubstitutionandcreatesthefunnyeffect.Inthisshortdiscourse,theword"
shouldcarryonedefinitemeaning.Infact,thedeviceofusingawordthatcanexpressambiguitymeaningsisaneasilyunderstoodone.
3.1.3Topicsubstitution
Topicsubstitutionmeansusingonejudgmenttosubstituteanother,orusingoneprerequisitetosubstitutethewholeprerequisite.
Example3:
Bride:
John,wouldyoulendmefiftydollarsifIaskedyou?
John:
Why,yes,Isupposeso."
Allright,then,lendmefifty,butjustgiveme25ofit."
0k,Butwhy?
Thenyou'
lloweme25andI'
lloweyou25andwe'
llbeallsquare."
Bridesubstitutesthemoneythatwillbelenttohimasthemoneyheownshimself.Onthatfalsebasishemakesinfactanunfairplan.ItisRightpremisesvs.Reasonfromfalsepremisesscriptoppositionandtheresolutionmakesalaugh.
3.1.4TopicDivergence
Topicsdivergencereferstoachangeinthedirectionoftheconversationinsteadoffollowingthecourseofcommunication:
Example4:
Marywassodisgustedatherhusband'
scigarettesmokingthatshecomplainedtohimoneday.
Ihopethatallthecigarettefactorieswillcatchfiresomeday."
Don'
tworry,dear.Allthecigaretteswillbeonfiresoonerorlater."
Hesaidwithasmile.
Thefirst"
fire"
meansthefactorieswillbedestroyedbybig"
whilethesecond"
meansthecigaretteswillbelitandthensmoked.Theirsemanticmeaningsdifferalotinthiscontext.Therealmeaningofasentenceislargelydeterminedbythecontextinwhichitoccurs.Aslanguagecanservemanypurposes,onlywiththeoverallconsiderationofthespecificbackgroundcanweobtainthecorrectintentionoftheexpression.Humorexploitstheambiguityandleadsthereaderuptothegardenpath.
3.2ViolationoftheLawofNon-contradiction
Accordingtothenon-contradictionlaw,AcannotbebothAandnotA.Itmeansthatifanythingissaidtohaveacertainattribute,itcannotbesaidnottohavethatattribute.Inotherwords,anexpressioncannothaveandhavenoneofacertainmeaningatthesametime.Manyhumorousstoriescomefromfloutingthislaw.
Example5:
MymotherandIwerestandingatthecheckoutinthesupermarketasthecashierscanned
thethingswebought.Whenthepriceofabottleoforangejuicewasscannedas$4,mymother
said,"
It'
sonly$3.95."
Thecashierstoppedwhatshewasdoinganddisappeareddownoneoftheaislestocheck
theprice.Shesoonreturnedandsaidthatthepricewas$3.95.Whenshehandedmymother
thechange,thefivecentcoinrolledontothefloor.Muchtomyamusement,asthecashierbent
overtosearchforit,mymothersaid"
Oh,don'
tbother,it'
sonlyfivecents."
T