库存管理中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx
《库存管理中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《库存管理中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx(21页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
![库存管理中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx](https://file1.bingdoc.com/fileroot1/2023-4/28/e7f9feda-0c66-413f-b7a0-713a19b302b6/e7f9feda-0c66-413f-b7a0-713a19b302b61.gif)
文献信息:
文献标题:
A Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for InventoryManagement(库存管理的多准则决策框架)
国外作者:
PK Krishnadevarajan,S Balasubramanian,N Kannan,VRavichandran
文献出处:
《InternationalJournalofManagement》,2016,7
(1):
85-93字数统计:
英文3228单词,17138字符;中文5509汉字
外文文献:
AMulti-CriteriaDecisionFrameworkforInventory
Management
AbstractInventorymanagementisaprocess/practicethateverycompanyundertakes.Mostcompaniesfailtoapplyacomprehensivesetofcriteriatoranktheirproducts/items.Thecriteriaaretoofeworsubjectiveinnature.Inventoryisrequiredtostayinbusinessandmeetcustomerneeds.Ifitisnotdonerightitcausesdeteriorationincustomerserviceandcouldleadtodamagestobothcustomerandsupplierrelationsandeventuallycausebusinessbreakdown.Asimplemulti-criteriadrivenholisticframeworkdevelopedbyindustryinputiscriticaltothesuccessofinventorymanagement.AninventorymanagementframeworkusingFIVEmain-criteriacategories(revenue,customerservice,profitability,growth,risk),21(between3and6ineachcategory)metricsand4ranks(A,B,C,D)ispresentedinthispapertoassistcompanieswiththeirinventorymanagementprocess.Theframeworkthatispresentedhasbeendevelopedthroughliteraturereview,surveys,interviewsandfocus
groupswithseveralindustryowners,inventorymanagersandbusinessmanagers.TheinteractionwithcompaniesledtoasetofTHREEcriticalquestions:
1.Isthereacomprehensiveinventorymanagementframework?
2.Whatinventorymetricsshouldbetrackedormonitoredonaroutinebasis?
3.Howdoimplementamulti-criteriainventoryclassification?
Thispaperisanattempttoanswerthesecriticalquestionsandprovideaframeworkthatisdevelopedbybringingtogetherexistingliteratureavailableandinput/findingsfromindustryexecutivesintheareaofinventorymanagement.
Keywords:
Inventory,InventoryManagement,InventoryClassification,InventoryRanking,Multi-CriteriaInventoryManagement.
1.INTRODUCTION
Inventoryisacriticalassetandresourcethatishandledextensivelybymostbusinesses.Managinginventoryeffectivelyhasbeensomethingthateverycompanystrivesfor;however,itisalsoanareawherecompaniesoftenhavefailedandstillcontinuetofail.Companieshandlemultipleitems/productsbuttreatallitemsequallybecausethebusinessobjectiveistoservethecustomer.Asaresulttheyenduphavingexcessinventoryofthewrongitems.Asbusinessesexpandtherearesomanyproductsininventoryandthecompanyendsuphavingmorestockinginventoryforeachproductorendupinvestingmoreinthewronginventory.Item/inventorystratificationistheprocessofrankingitemsbasedonrelevantfactorsapplicabletothebusinessenvironment.AccordingtoPradipKumarKrishnadevarajan,GunasekaranS.,LawrenceF.B.andRaoB(2015)andPradipKumarKrishnadevarajan,SBalasubramanianandNKannan(2015)youshouldclassifyitemsintoacertainnumberofcategories(typicallylessthanfive)sothatmanagingthemday-to-daydoesnotbecomeunwieldy.Thisisespeciallyneededwhenhandlingseveralhundredsor
thousandsofitems,whereidentifyingandfocusingonthemostcriticalitemsisofutmostimportancetoallowresourcestobeusedeffectivelyandefficiently.Thisstratificationprocessistypicallydoneataphysicallocationlevel(atbranchesordistributioncenters)acrosstheentirecompany,althoughitcouldbeappliedathigherlevels(regionsortheentirecompany).Theitemstratificationprocessisusuallynotwell-definedorgivendueimportance,anditoftengetsover-simplified.Theinventorystratificationprocessshouldaddressseveralmetricsandamulti-criteriaapproachmustbetakenforeffectiveinventorymanagement.Thispaperattemptstopresentacomprehensiveframeworkthatcouldassistcompaniesinchoosingtherightsetofmetricstoperforminventoryrankingfortheirbusiness.
2.FRAMEWORKDEVELOPMENT
Theprocessofinventoryclassificationactuallybeginsbydevelopingorchoosingaframeworkthatsuitsthecompany’svisionandgoals.Thedevelopmentprocessoftheproposedinventoryframeworkprocesstookplaceintwostages.Thefirststagewastolookatexistingliteraturetounderstandthedifferentfactors/criteriathatarebeingusedforinventoryevaluationbyvariousindustries/businesses.Thesecondstagewasinteractionwithcompaniestogatherinput,understandmetricsusedandchallengesfacedinexecutingtheinventoryclassificationprocess.
2.1.LiteratureReview
(Pareto,1906)observedthatabout20%ofthepopulationofacountryhasabout80%ofitswealth(alsoknownasthe80-20rule).Thisruleholdstrueforitemssoldbyafirm:
about20%ofitemsaccountforabout80%ofafirm’srevenue.
(FloresandWhybark,1987)presentaninventoryrankingmodeldrivenbycriticalityanddollar-usage.Thefirststageisfortheuserstoranktheitemsbasedoncriticality,thesecondstageranksitemsbasedondollar/currencyusage.Basedonusage,itemsarerankedasA,BorC.
(Flores,OlsonandDorai,1992)proposetheuseofAHPasameansfordecisionmakerstocustomdesignaformulareflectingtherelativeimportanceofeachunitofinventoryitembasedonaweightedvalueofthecriteriautilized.Thefactorsappliedare–totalannualusage(quantity),averageunitcost(currency),annualusage(currency),leadtimeandcriticality.Theyalsopresentareclassificationmodelbasedonthefollowingfactorsandweights:
criticality(42%),followedbyleadtime(41%),annualdollarusage(9.2%),andaverageunitcost(7.8%).
(Schreibfeder,2005)recommendacombinationmodelusingcostofgoodssold(procurementpricefromsupplier),numberoftransactions(ordersorhits),andprofitability(grossmargin).
(Lawrence,GunasekaranandKrishnadevarajan,2009)statethatbestpracticesinitemstratificationarebasedonmultiplefactorssuchassales,logistics(hits),andprofitability(grossmargincurrencyorpercentage,orgrossmarginreturnoninventoryinvestment[GMROII])thathelptoattaintheoptimalsolutioninmostcases.Companies,however,canincludemorefactorsspecifictotheirbusinessenvironment,suchasleadtime,senseofurgency,productdependency,criticality,productlifecycleandlogisticscosts.Theyalsopresentamodeltoclassifyitemsbasedondemandpattern.Ademandstabilityindex(DSI)isestablishedusingthreecriteria–demandfrequencyorusagefrequency,demandsizeanddemandvariability.
(PradipKumarKrishnadevarajan,Gunasekaran,LawrenceandRao,2013)rankitemsinto4categories(High,medium-plus,medium-minus,low)forriskmanagementandpricesensitivity.Rankingisbasedonunitcostoftheitem.Itemsarealsorankedbasedonannualusage(currency),hits,grossmargin(currency)andgrossmargin(percentage).ThefinalranksareCritical(A&Bitems),important(Citems)andnon-critical(Ditems).
(DhokaandChoudary,2013)classifyitemsbasedondemandpredictability(XYZAnalysis).ItemswhichhaveuniformdemandarerankedasX,varyingdemandasY,andabnormaldemandasZ.
(Hatefi,TorabiandBagheri,2014)presentamodifiedlinearoptimizationmethodthatenablesinventorymanagerstoclassifyanumberofinventoryitemsinthepresenceofbothqualitativeandquantitativecriteriawithoutanysubjectivity.ThefourfactorsusedareADU(Annualdollarusage),CF(criticalfactor–verycritical[VC],moderatelycritical[MC]ornon-critical[NC]),AUC(Averageunitcost)andLT(LeadTime).ItemsarerankedasA,B,orC.
(Xue,2014)connectsthecharacteristicsofmaterialssupplyandtherelationshipbetweenpartsandproduction,aclassificationmodelbasedonmaterialsattributes.Theseveralcriteriaappliedinthedecisiontreemodelare:
Partsusagerate,carrying-holding-possessioncosts,ordering-purchasecosts,shortagecost,anddeliveryability.
(Šarić,Šimunović,PezerandŠimunović,2014)presentaresearchoninventoryABCclassificationusingvariousmulti-criteriamethods(AHP)methodandclusteranalysis)andneuralnetworks.Themodeluses4criteria–Annualcost,Criticality,LeadTime1andLeadTime2.
(Kumar,RajanandBalan,2014)rankitemsbasedontheircostinbillofmaterials(ABCranking).“A”items-70%highervalueofitemsofbillofmaterial,“B”items–20%MediumvalueofitemsofBillofmaterialand“C”items–10%LowervalueofitemsofBillofmaterial.Theyalsodeterminevital,essential,anddesirablecomponentsrequiredforassembly(VEDanalysis).
(SarmahandMoharana,2015)presentamodelthathas5criteria–consumptionrate,unitprice,replenishmentleadtime,commonalityandcriticality.
(PradipKumarKrishnadevarajan,Balasubramanian,andKannan,2015)presentastrategicbusinessstratificationframeworkbasedon:
suppliers,product,demand,space,service,market,customerandpeople.
(PradipKumarKrishnadevarajan,Vignesh,BalasubramanianandKannan,2015)presentaframeworkforsupplierclassificationbasedonseveralcategories:
convenience,customerservice,profitability(financial),growth,innovation,inventory,
qualityandrisk.Asimilarframeworkcanbeextendedbasedonthesupplierclassificationforitemsorproducts.
2.2.IndustryFeedback
Interactionwithcompanieswasperformedthroughsurveys,interviewsandfocusgroupswithseveralindustryowners,inventory/purchasingmanagersandbusinessmanagers.Theobjectivewastogetanideaofthemetricsbeingutilizedforinventoryclassification,challengesfaced,inventoryframeworkdeployedandtheeffectivenessoftheircurrentinventoryperformancemanagementprocesses.Keyfindingsfromtheindustryinteractionwerethefollowing:
•Lackofainventorymanagementfra