英语文体学课本510.docx

上传人:b****5 文档编号:8807133 上传时间:2023-05-15 格式:DOCX 页数:90 大小:271.22KB
下载 相关 举报
英语文体学课本510.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第17页
第17页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第18页
第18页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第19页
第19页 / 共90页
英语文体学课本510.docx_第20页
第20页 / 共90页
亲,该文档总共90页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

英语文体学课本510.docx

《英语文体学课本510.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英语文体学课本510.docx(90页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

英语文体学课本510.docx

英语文体学课本510

5FormalvsInformalLanguage

5.1TheInterpersonalFunctionofLanguage

Weknowlanguageperformsvariousfunctions:

theideationalorreferential,theinterpersonalorexpressive/social,andthetextual(see1.4fordetail).

Butmanytreatmentsoflanguagetendtoemphasizeonlytheideationalorreferentialfunctionoflanguage.Languageisusedtotalkaboutobjects,personsandideas,tonameanddefinethem,toimpartandcommunicateinformation,etc.Thatlanguagecanbedoingotherthingsatthesametimeisoftenignored.Weknow,forinstance,thatgreetingslike'Hello.Howareyou?

''Justfine,thanks.Andyou?

'arenotusedtogetinformationabouthowoneisfeeling,butrathergiventopeoplethatoneknowsandwantsto(ormust)recognize.Nottogivegreetingstoone'sacquaintanceswouldbetochangetherelationshiporevenpossiblyendit.Languageshapes,definesandidentifiesrolesandrelationships.Itcanbringpeopletogetherorseparatethem.Thesefunctionsarepurelysocialinnature.Correlatedwiththisaretenorsofdiscourse.

Tenorsinvolvetherelationshipbetweenparticipantsinthesituation,theirrolesandstatus.Theparticipantrelationsthatdeterminethetenorofdiscourserangethroughvaryingdegreesofpermanence.Mosttemporaryarethosewhentheparticipantsareataparty,orhavemetonatrain.Attheoppositeendarerelationssuchasthatbetweenparentsandchildren.Varioussociallydefinedrelations,asbetweenteacherandpupil,orlaborandmanagement,liesomewhereintermediately.Thenumberandtypesofrolestobeplayedbybothaddresser(speaker/writer)andaddressee(hearer/reader)areonalargepartdeterminedbythestructureofsociety:

byeconomicstatus,byeducation,byoccupation,byethnicgroup,bygenderetc.Everyindividualwillfitinsomeofthecategoriesandfindhis/herstatusinthecommunity.Ifapersonhashadagoodtrainingandhasbeenteachingforalongtime,thenthepersonisateacher;atthesametimethepersonmaybeamanorawoman,afatheroramother,afriendofsomebodyoratotalstranger,aheareratameetingoraspeaker.Thepersonwillplaysuchrolesandaccordinglywill'act'andspeakinanappropriatemannerforeachoftheseidentities.Ateacherwilltalklikeateacherinfrontofhisstudents,amotherwilltalklikeamothertoherchildren.Theintimateandcolloquialvocabularyinalover'slettercontrastswithahighdegreeoftechnicallanguageintheresearcharticle.Aninterviewforajobisdifferentfromcasualconversation.

Whatismore,thelanguageanindividualuseswillredefineeachsituation.Whenpeopleexchange'Howdoyoudo?

',weknowthattheyaredefiningtheirrelationshipasthatofstrangertostranger.Whenlaterontheysay'Hello,gladtomeetyouagain'toeachother,weknowtheyarenolongerstrangers.InChina,ifapersonispromotedtothepositionoftheheadofadepartment,thenhe/shewillbeaddressedasZhuren(DeaninEnglish)byhis/hersubordinates.Buthis/hersuperiors(forinstancethepresidentoftheuniversity)arelikelytocallhim/herbyname.Changesinstatuswillsurelybeshowninlanguage.Whatisinvolvedhereismainlythedegreeofformality.

5.2DegreesofFormality

FORMALITYreferstothewayinwhichthestyleoflanguagewillvaryinappropriatenessaccordingtothesocialcontext:

theoccasionandtherelationshipbetweenaddresserandaddressee(s).

Personaltenorexpressesthevariousrolesassumedbytheparticipantsandthedegreeofformalityoftheirrelationship.

Theaddressformspeopleuseareprobablythemostdirectandobviousmeanstoindicaterolesandrelationships.

TheaddressformsintheEnglishlanguagepresentthreemostfrequentlyusedpatterns:

1)thereciprocalexchangeofTitleplusLastName(TLN);2)thereciprocalexchangeofFirstName(FN);3)thenon-reciprocalpatterninwhichonepersonusesFNandtheotherTLN.GenerallymutualTLNindicatesanacquaintance-to-acquaintanceroleandrelationshipwhilemutualFNindicatesafriend-to-friendroleandrelationship.Thedegreeofformalityisnotthesameeither:

theformerbeingformalandthelatterintimate.Butinbothcasesthestatusoftheparticipantsisaboutthesame.Theuseofthenon-reciprocalpatternindicates,however,thattherolestobeplayedbytheparticipantsarenotthesame:

oneishigherinstatusthantheother.ChildrenaresupposedtouseTLNtoadultsandreceiveFN;thoseinsubordinatestatussuchasstudent,employee,areexpectedtouseTLNtothoseinhigherstatussuchasteacher,bossandreceiveFN.TheuseofTLNshowsdeference/respectanddistancewhiletheuseofFNshowscondescension/superiorityandintimacy.

Oftenapersonisaddressedwithtitlealonelike'YourHonor'forajudge,'Sir'foragentleman,'Madam'foralady.Thisshowsahigherdegreeofformalityandalongerdistancebetweenaddresserandaddressee.FNusetowardtitularsuperior(theboss,thedirector)exhibitsprivilegeof,forinstance,oldco-worker,fellowstudent/countryman,orprivilegeofage,position(seniorengineer,professor).Ontheotherhand,whenapersonisaddressedwithmultiplenames,forinstance,tocallRobertWilliamsas'Williams','Robert','Bob','Willie',ortocallJamesScogginas'Scoggin','James','Jim','Scoggs',ahighdegreeofinformalitybetweenclosefriendsisconveyed.

ThereisatendencyforadultsofequalstatustobegintheiracquaintanceshipwithMutualTLNandmoveontoMutualFN(thoughyoungpeoplenowadaysuseFNevenwhentheyareintroducingeachother).Peopleofunequalstatusarelikelytobeginwithnon-reciprocalityandkeepthestategoingwithoutnecessarilymovingtothemutualFNpatternuntilthepersoninthesuperiorstatusinitiatesthemoveandencourageshis/hersubordinatetoexchangeFNwithhim/her.Husbandandwifeoftensimplyuse'love','dear',or'honey'toaddresseachother.

Theobservanceofimpersonalityisalsointeresting.Onaformaloccasion,aspeaker,outofconsiderationofpoliteness,wouldnotmakeanyreferencetotheimmediatecontextofsituationbetweenaddresserandaddresseebytheuseofpersonalpronounsyouand/,eventheTLNoftheaddressee,nortohis/herfeelingsandopinions.Thusinsteadofsaying

Ithinkyou/DrWoodshouldairyour/hisview.

Wesay

ItisthoughtthattheDeanshouldgivehisopinion.

Andnotsaying

Howmuchdoyougetforyourteachingjob?

whichislikelytobeconsideredasnosyandimpertinentasintrudingonotherpeople'spersonalmatters,wesay

IwonderhowmuchtheaverageAmericansgetforateachingjob.

Thelanguageused,dearly,isformal.

Peoplearegenerallyawareofthedifferenceinpersonaltenorbetweenformal(relativelystiff,cold,polite,impersonal)ontheonesideandinformal(relativelyrelaxed,warm,rude,friendly)ontheother.Thecorrespondinglinguisticcontrastinvolvesgrammar,vocabularyandphonology.Comparethefollowing,forexample:

Patronsarerequestedtoascendtothenextfloor.(formal)

OK,guys!

Getuptothenextfloor!

(informal)

Ishouldmostcertainlyliketoattendyourball,SirReginald.(formal)

I'dliketocometoyourdo,Reg.(informal)

5.3FunctionalTenorandDegreesofFormality

Functionaltenortellsustheaddresser'sintentionofusingthelanguage:

forteaching?

persuading?

amusing?

explaining?

controlling?

insulting?

arguing?

satirizing?

Functionaltenorisnotdifficulttodiscern.Differentsituationaltypesoflanguageareendowedwithdifferentpredominantfunctions,asadvertisingwithpersuasion,alecturewithexposition,apoliticalspeechwithagitation,andthesermonwithexhortationandteaching.

Certainfunctionaltenorscanhitanypointonthepersonaltenorformalitycontinuum.Anexpositoryspeechcanbeformal,withmanypassiveconstructionsandatechnicalvocabulary.Itcanalsobeinformal,inanad-libmanner,withpersonalanecdotes,referencetotheaudience.Aninsultmayalsobeformalorinformal.Aformalinsultingdependsonformalstructureandvocabularyaswellascalmordeliberatedelivery.Thus

Ishallallownos.o.b,totamperwithmyaffairs!

wouldbemoreformalthan

Keepoutofmyaffairs,yous.o.b.!

And

Sir,youareaswine!

HereisaMarkTwaininformalinsult:

Why,youturnip,ifyouhadlaidlowandkeptdark,there'schancestobuyanAmericanhorseformightylittlemorethanyoupaidforthatbloodyoldforeignrelic.

Inofficialese,formallanguagecanbeoverusedandbecomewhatiscalled'gobbledygook'--meaninglessbutimportant-soundingofficiallanguage.Suchlanguageisverboseandlong-winded,fullofmulti-syllabicwordsandemptyorvaguephrases,asareoftenseeninofficialbusinessreports.Forinstance,insteadofmakingaclearstatementthat

Somewerekilled.

theofficialspokesmanwouldsaysomethinglike

Althoughtherehavebeenclashes,onlyinafewcasesweretheinjuriesfatal.

andinsteadofsaying

Oneshouldhavenoracialprejudice.

thosewhoprefergobbledygookwouldsay

Itnecessitatesaprojectionofthehumanmindoverthebarrierofrace.

Theideabehindthisiseithertoconcealtheharshtruthofamatterortoaffectakindofprofoundnessforastatement.Naturallysuchpracticehasbeenmuchridiculedandcriticized.

5.4MartinJoos'Classification

MartinJoos(1967)describestherangeofformalityashavingfivelevels:

frozen,formal,consultative,casual,andintimate,whichisbelievedthateveryspeakerhasaccessto.

InJoos'analysis,thefrozenlevelisusedforwrittenlegaldocumentsorhighlysolemnspeechwhichconsistsofmemorizedsentencesthatmustberepeatedverbatim.Thesemightincludequotationsfromproverbsorritualexpressionswhicharepartofaformalcer

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 医药卫生 > 基础医学

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2