高级英语第二册第十一课学习辅导资料.docx
《高级英语第二册第十一课学习辅导资料.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《高级英语第二册第十一课学习辅导资料.docx(51页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
高级英语第二册第十一课学习辅导资料
1TowriteabouttheEnglishinstandardandcosmopolitanpoliticalterms,the
usualLeft-Centre-Rightstuff,isalmostalwayswastingtimeandtrouble.TheEnglish
aredifferent.TheEnglishareevenmoredifferentthantheythinktheyare,thoughnot
moredifferentthantheyfeeltheyare.Andwhattheyfeel—Englishnessagain-is
moreimportantthanwhattheythink.Itisinstinctivefeelingandnotrationalthought
thatshapesandcoloursactualeventsinEngland.
2Forexample,althoughtheEnglishseemtobesosharplydivided,always
indulginginplentyofloudpoliticalabuse,therearenothinglikesomanyCommunists
orneo-orpotentialFascistsinEnglandasthereareinmostothercountries.Again,
althoughtheEnglishseemtohavemorethantheirshareofrallies,protestmarches,
confrontationswithauthority,whatcouldbegintolooklikeamurderousencounterin
FranceorAmerica,ormightbeabloodystreetbattleinJapan,wouldinEnglandend
attheworstinafewscufflesandarrests.Thisisbecausetherearefewerfanatical
believersamongtheEnglish,andatthesametime,belowthenoisyarguments,the
abuseandthequarrels,thereisareservoirofinstinctivefellow-feeling,notyet
exhaustedthoughitmaynotbefillingup.Noteverybodycandrawonthatreservoir.No
doubtthereareinEnglandsomesnarlingshopstewardswhodemandfreedomforthe
workerswhenwhattheyreallywantistobringthewholesystemcrashingdown,
togetherwitheveryguaranteeofliberty.Nodoubttherearewealthyemployerswho
smileattheTVcamerasanddeclarethatalltheydesireisthefriendliestrelationwith
theirworkforce,whenathearttheywouldliketotakeawhiptothewholeidle
troublesomemobofthem.Buttherearenotmanyofthesemen,eitherontheboard
ortheshopfloor,andtheyarecertainlynottypicalEnglish.Somecancerintheir
characterhaseatenawaytheirEnglishness.
3TherealEnglish,whoare‘different’,whohaveinheritedEnglishnessandhave
notyetthrownawaytheirinheritance,cannotfeelathomeinthecontemporaryworld,
representingtheaccelerateddevelopmentofourwholeage.Itdemandsbigness,and
theyaresuspiciousofbigness.(AndthereisnownotonlyIndustrialbigness;thereis
alsoScientificbigness,needingmoreandmoretodiscoverlessandless.)Clearly
everythingcannotbedonebysmallishandreasonablyhumanenterprises.Nocosy
shipyardcanundertaketobuilda150,000-tonship,thoughwemaynotbeinourright
mindsifwewantsuchaship.ButitissafetosaythatwhileEnglishnessmay
reluctantlyacceptbigness,itsmonstersareneverheartilywelcomed.Theylookall
rightinAmerica,itselfsolarge,butseemaltogetheroutofscaleinEngland.Along
withthedemandforbignessgoesademandforsevereefficiency,oftenquiterational
butnotreasonable,thereforealientoEnglishness.Afurthernecessarydemand,to
feedthemonsterwithhigherandhigherfiguresandlargerandlargerprofits,isfor
enormousadvertisingcampaignsandbrigadesofrazor-keensalesmen.Finally,from
themonsterandallitsspokesmencomesamessage,endlesslyrepeated.Itruns
moreorlessasfollows:
‘Yououghttobehappy.Butyouarenothappy.Youcanbe
happy,though,ifyoubuywhatwearemakingforyou.’Andapostscriptmightbe
addedfromIago:
‘Putmoneyinthypurse.’
4Iliketocallthis‘Admass’,andwilldosofromnowon.Iwillalsoannounce
whatthefutureoftheEnglishhangsupon,whileatthesametime,unlikealmost
everybodyelse,keepingwellclearofeconomics.Ithangsuponthefinalresultofa
battlethathasbeengoingonforsomeyearsnowandthatexplainswhytheEnglish
seemsoodd,eccentric,unsatisfactory,notonlyabroadbuttomanypersonsathome.
ItisabattlethatisbeingfoughtinthemindsoftheEnglish.Itisbetween'Admass',
whichhasalreadyconqueredmostoftheWesternworld,and'Englishness',ailingand
impoverished,innopositiontoreceivevastsubsidiesofdollars,francs,deutschmarks
andtherest,forpublicrelationsandadvertisingcampaigns.Thetriumphsof'Admass'
canbeplainlyseen.Itoperatesintheoutervisibleworld,whereitoffersmoreand
morethings-formoreandmoremoneyofcourse-andcreatestheso-called‘Good
Life’.Againstthis,atleastsuperficially,'Englishness'seemsapoorshadowyshow–
afaintpencilsketchbesideaposterinfullcolour-belongingasitreallydoestothe
invisibleinnerworld,merelyofferingstatesofmindinplaceofthatrichvarietyof
things.Butthenwhilethingsareimportant,statesofmindareevenmoreimportant.
5Itiseasytounderstandwhythereshouldbethisconflictbetween'Admass'and
'Englishness'.Whatiscentralto'Admass'istheproductionandconsumptionof
goods.Ifthereisenoughofthis—thoughofcoursethereneveris,because
dissatisfactionisbuiltinto'Admass'-therewillbesufficientmoneytopayforits
‘GoodLife’.ButitisworthnotingalongthewaythatwhileAmericahasbeenformany
yearsthechiefadvocateof'Admass',Americahasshownustoomanydesperately
worriedexecutivesdroppingintoearlygraves,toomanyexhaustedsalesmentaking
refugeinbarsandbreakinguptheirhomes,toomanyworkmensufferingfrom
monotonyortime-and-motionstudiesandwonderinghowthehelltheygotintothese
traps.AndAmerica,toitscredit,canalsoshowusalotofsensiblemenandwomen
whohavedenouncedallthisandhavewalkedoutofit.Butthisbookisaboutthe
English,nottheAmericans.Now'Englishness',withitsrelationtotheunconscious,its
dependenceuponinstinctandintuition,cannotbreakitslinkswiththepast:
ithas
deeplongroots.Beingitselfastateofmind,itcannotignoreotherstatesofmindand
cannothelpfeelingthat'Admass',withitsruthlesscompetitiveness,itsideaofman
simplyasaproducerandconsumer,itsdependenceupondissatisfaction,greedand
envy,mustberesponsibleforbadandnotgoodstatesofmind.Furthermore,while
'Englishness'isnothostiletochange,itisdeeplysuspiciousofchangeforchange’s
sake,rejectingtheideathatwearenowcommittedtosomeinevitablemechanical
progress.Herewemighttakeaconcreteexample.'Englishness'wouldsupportan
immediatedemand,attheexpenseofmanyotherthings,formoreandbetterhousing.
Withoutadequateshelterandadecentplacetocalltheirown,peoplefeelwretched.
ButpeopleinEngland,notabigcountry,donothavetohavemoreandmoreand
largerandlargercars,withlongerandwidermotorways,wreckingthecountryside,to
takethecars.Iftheythinktheydo,thisis'Admass'atwork.Peoplehavewanted
housesforcenturies,andcarsoftheirownonlyforaveryshorttime.Toputcarsand
motorwaysbeforehousesseemsto'Englishness'acommunalimbecility.
6ThebattlethatwilldecidethefutureoftheEnglishisgoingonallroundus.At
thistimeofwriting,weinEnglandareinthemiddleofit.Imustaddthatwhile
'Englishness'canstillfighton,'Admass'couldbewinning.Therearevariousreasons
whythismaybehappening.Tobeginwith,notalltheEnglishholdfastto'Englishness'.
Someimportantandinfluentialmencarefullytrainthemselvesoutofit-politicians,
academics,bureaucrats,ambitiousfinanciersandindustrialists,canbefoundamong
thesemen-andahordeofothers,shallowandfoolish,wanderawayfromit,
shruggingofftheirinheritance.'Englishness'isnotasstrongasitwaseventhirtyyears
ago.Itneedstobenourishedbyasenseofthedignityandpossibledestinyof
mankind.Itmusthavesomemoralcapitaltodrawupon,andsoonitmaybeasking
foranoverdraft.TheZeitgeistseemstobeworkingfor'Admass'.Sodoesmostof
whatwereadandwhatwehear.Evenourinflation,whichkeepseverybodynudging
everybodyformoremoney,isoftenseennotasawarning,notasanenemyofthe
genuinegoodlife,butasaproofthatweneedmoreandnotless'Admass'.
7Somebattleshavebeenwonorlostbecausethecommanderofalargeforce,
arrivinglate,decidedalmostatthelastmomenttochangesides.Ifeelthatapowerful
sectionofEnglishworkers,togetherwiththeirunionbosses,isinthesamesituationas
thatcommanderjustbeforehecouldmakeuphismind.Thesemenbelievethatif
thereisa‘GoodLife’going,thenit’shightimetheyhadtheirshareofit.Butsome
remaining'Englishness'inthemwhispersthattheremaybeacatchinit.Where’sthis
‘GoodLife’insweatingyourgutsout,justbecausethemanagersareonthe
productivity-per-man-hourcaper?
It’sallaracketanyhow.Ifwedon’tworklikethe
oldmanusedtodo,we’renotturningoutthehoneststufftheoldmanwasexpected
toturnout.It’stheprofitnow,nottheproduct.Halfthetime,wecheattheforemen,
theforemencheatthemanagement,themanagementcheatsthecustomers.Okay,
wewantshorterhours,moreholidays,biggerpaypackets-thenthe‘GoodLife’ofthe
advertsforus.Orarewekiddingourselves?
8NowIamnotpretendingthatsomethinglikethisisbeingsaidineverybranchof
Englishindustry,andcertainlynotwherethereisagenuine-ifratherold-fashioned–
prideintheworkonhand.Butsomethinglikeitisbeingsaid,thoughtorfelt,inthevery
placeswherethereisthemostmoney,themostboredom,themosttroubleand
‘industrialaction’,andindeedthemost'Admass'.Behindtheconstantbickering,the
suddenwalk-outsandstrikes,the‘bloody-mindedness’,whichbewildersomany
foreigncommentators,istheconflictbetween'Admass',offeringsomuch,a