语言学讲义缩略版.docx
《语言学讲义缩略版.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《语言学讲义缩略版.docx(108页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
语言学讲义缩略版
Chapter1InvitationstoLinguistics
1.1Whystudylanguage?
(p.1)
Languageisanintegralpartofourlifeandhumanity.Manypeopletakeitforgrantedandtheydon’tthinkitisworthyofstudyandtheyjustthinkitisatoolforaccesstootherfields.
Thereareplentyofacademicandpersonalreasonstostudylanguage.Ontheacademiclevel,thestudyoflanguagecanprovideadeeperunderstandingofthesocialstudiesandhumanities.Knowledgeaboutlanguageisimportanttounderstandsocialstudiesontopicssuchaseducation,intelligence,personality,memory,groupinteraction,andcognition.Languageplaysanimportantroleinstudiesoflogic,composition,literature,history,internationalrelations,religion,andphilosophy.Onapersonallevel,wegrowupinalanguage-richenvironmentthatprovidesabasisforourpsychologicaldevelopmentandculturalawareness.Languageisourtoolforself-awareness,identitydevelopment,socialinteraction,problemsolvingandintellectualandpsychologicalgrowth.
Notmanypeoplewouldstopandthinkwhatmeaningstheordinaryword“language”has.Infact,itinvolvesseveraldifferentsenseswhichweneedtodistinguishinlinguistics.
First,languagecanmeanwhatapersonsaysorsaid,asin“whathesaidsoundsreasonableenough,butheexpressedhimselfinsuchbadlanguagethatmanypeoplemisunderstoodhim”.Inthissense,languagesimplyreferstheconcreteactofspeakingnagivensituation,ortheexpressiononeusesinspeech.
Secondly,apersondoesnotspeakinaparticularwayonlyononeoccasion;heoftenhasaconsistentwayofspeakingorwriting.So“language”issometimesusedtorefertothewholeofaperson’slanguage,asin“Shakespeare’slanguage”,“Luxun’slanguage”.Inthiscase,itisanindividual’spersonaldialectcalled“idiolect”.
Thirdly,“language”alsomeansaparticularvarietyorlevelofspeechorwriting,suchas“scientificlanguage”,or“languageforspecialpurposes”,“tradelanguage”andmanyothers.
Fourthly,whenwespeakof“theEnglishLanguage”,“theChineseLanguage”or“firstlanguage”,weareusing“language”torefertotheabstractsystemunderlyingthetotalityofthespeech/writingbehaviorofacommunity.Itreferstoeverythinginalanguagesystem.Thisiswhatwemeanwhenwesay“DoyouknowFrench?
”
Finally,thereisanevenmoreabstractsenseof“language”,referringtothecommonfeaturesofallhumanlanguages.Itmeansadefiningfeatureofhumanlanguagebehaviorascontrastedwithanimalsystemsofcommunication,oranyotherartificiallanguage.Whenwesay“Hestudieslanguage”,wemeanthathestudiestheuniversalpropertiesofallspeech/writingsystems,notjustoneparticularlanguage.
1.2Whatislanguage?
Thismayatfirstsoundlikeanaïveandsimplequestion.Yettothisextremelyfamiliar,everydayphenomenon,itisdifficulttogiveasatisfactorydefinition.Somepeoplemaysay“languageisatoolforhumancommunication”.Farfromadefinition,thisonlytellsuswhatlanguagedoes,orwhatitisusedfor,i.e.itsfunction.Othersmaysay“languageisasetofrules.”Thenthistellsnothingaboutitsfunctions,andthereareactuallyothersystemsthatarealsorule-governed.
Thefirstthreedefinitionsoflanguageofthefollowingwereproposedbysomemodernlinguists.Eachofthemhasitsownspecialemphasis,andisnottotallyfreefromlimitations.However,therearesomeimportantcharacteristicsofhumanlanguagelinguistshaveagreedon.
1.Languageisapurelyhumanandnon-instinctivemethodofcommunicatingideas,emotionsanddesiresbymeansofvoluntarilyproducedsymbols(Sapir,1921)
Languageistheinstitutionwherebyhumanscommunicateandinteractwitheachotherbymeansofhabituallyusedoral-auditoryarbitrarysymbols.(Hall,1968)
FromnowonIwillconsiderlanguagetobeaset(finiteorinfinite)ofsentences,eachfiniteinlengthandconstructedoutofafinitesetelements.(Chomsky,1957)
languageisasystemofarbitraryvocalsymbolsusedforhumancommunication.
Shortasitis,thefourthdefinitionhascapturedthemainfeaturesoflanguage.First,languagemustbeasystem,sinceelementsinitarearrangedaccordingtocertainrules;theycannotbecombinedatwill.InEnglish,“skde”isnotapossibleword;“tableheiscleaninga”willnotbeanacceptablesentence.Second,languageisarbitraryinthesensethatthereisnointrinsicconnectionbetweenalinguisticsymbolandwhatthesymbolstandsfor.Forexample,thethingwewritewithiscalled“pen”inEnglishand“bi”inChineseand“stylo”inFrench.Thefactthatlanguageshavedifferentwordsforthesameobjectisagoodillustrationofthearbitrarynatureoflanguage.Thisalsoexplainsthesymbolicnatureoflanguage:
wordsarejustsymbols;theyareassociatedwithobjects,actions,ideas,etc.byconvention.ThisconventionalnatureoflanguageiswellillustratedbyafamousquotationfromShakespeare’splayRomeoandJuliet:
“Arosebyanyothernamewouldsmellassweet.”Third,languageisvocalbecausetheprimarymediumforalllanguagesissound.Allevidencepointstothefactthatwritingsystemscameintobeingmuchlaterthanthespokenformsandthattheyareonlyattemptstocapturesoundsandmeaningonpaper.Thefactthatchildrenacquirespokenlanguagefirstbeforetheycanreadorwritealsoindicatesthatlanguageisprimarilyvocal.Fourth,theterm“human”inthedefinitionismeanttospecifythatlanguageishuman-specific,i.e.,itisdifferentfromthecommunicationsystemsotherformsoflifepossess,suchasbirdsongsandbeedances.Thisbringsustoaquestionofgreatinterest:
Inwhatwaysarehumanlanguagesdifferentfromsystemsofnon-humancommunication?
Thisiswhatweconcernaboutinthenextsection.
1.3Designfeaturesoflanguage
Designfeature:
thedefiningpropertiesofhumanlanguagethatdistinguishitfromanyanimalsystemofcommunication.
1.3.1Arbitrariness
Bysayingthat“languageisarbitrary”,wemeanthatthereisnologicalconnectionbetweenmeaningandsound.
(1)Arbitraryrelationshipbetweenthesoundofamorphemeanditsmeaning.
Twopointshavetobeclarified.Ononehand,weshouldbeawarethatwhilelanguageisarbitrarybynature,itisnotentirearbitrary;certainwordsaremotivated.Thebestexamplesaretheonomatopoeicwords,suchasrumble,crash,banginEnglish.Besides,somecompoundwordsarealsonotentirelyarbitrary.Forexamplewhile“photo”and“copy”arebotharbitrary,thecompoundword“photocopy”isnotentirelyarbitrary.Ontheotherhand,agoodexampleisthefactthatdifferentsoundsareusedtorefertothesameobjectindifferentlanguages.
(2)Arbitrarinessatthesyntacticlevel
Syntaxreferstothewaysthatsentencesareconstructedaccordingtothegrammarofarrangement.Accordingly,syntaxisnotsoarbitraryaswords.Thiscanbeshownintheexamplesonpage5.
(3)Arbitrarinessandconvention
Wesaythatlanguageisarbitrary.Butwhydopeoplechoosethiskindoflinguisticsignsinsteadofothers?
Thisisoutofconvention.Itisthearbitrarinessthatmakeslanguagecreativeanditisconventionalitythatmakestheresearchintothelanguagepossible.Aslanguagelearners,wehavetopaymoreattentiontotheconventionalityoflanguages.
1.3.2Duality
Languageisasystem,whichconsistsoftwosetsofstructures,ortwolevels.Atthelowerlevel,thereisastructureofsounds,whicharemeaninglessbythemselves.Butthesoundsoflanguagecanbegroupedandregroupedintoalargernumberofunitsofmeaning,whicharefoundatthehigherlevelofthesystem.Forexample,thegroupingofthethreesound/k/,/a:
/,and/p/canmeaneitherakindoffish(carp),orapublicplaceforrestandamusement(park).Thentheunitsatthehigherlevelcanbearrangedandrearrangedintoinfinitenumberofsentences.Thisdualityofstructureordoublearticulationoflanguageenablesitsuserstotalkaboutanythingwithintheirknowledge.Noanimalcommunicationsystemhasdualityorevencomesneartopossessingit.
1.3.3Creativity
Languageiscreativeinthesensethatuserscanunderstandandcreatesentencestheyhaveneverheardbefore.Everydaywesendmessagesthathaveneverbeensentandunderstandnovelmessages.Muchofwhatwesayandhearforthefirsttime,yetthereseemsnoproblemsofunderstanding.Creativityseemspeculiartohumanlanguage.Agibboncallsystem,forexample,isnotcreative,forgibbonsdrawalltheircallsfromafixedrepertoirewhichisrapidlyexhausted,makinganynoveltyimpossible.Thebeedance,however,doeshavealimitedcreativity,asisusedtocommunicateaboutfoodsourcesinanydirection.Butfoodsourcesaretheonlykindofmessagesthatcanbesentthroughthebeedance;beesdonot“talk”aboutthemselves.
Note:
Recursiveness:
accordingtosomelinguistictheories,thecapacitythatenablesthegrammarofalanguagetoproduceaninfinitenumberofsentences.ThisviewofgrammarwasemphasizedinChomsky’earlygrammaticaltheories.Manylinguiststodayarguethatlanguageuseisinfactcharacterizedbytherepeateduseoffixedexpressionandcollocation.
Recursiverule:
arulewhichcanbeappliedrepeatedlywithoutanydefinitelimit.Forexample,arecursiverulefortheadditionofrelativeclausescouldproduce:
Themansawthedogwhichbitthegirlwhowasstrokingthecatwhichhadcaughtthemousewhichhadeatenthecheesewhich…
1.3.4Displacement
Languagecanbeusedtorefertothingswhicharenotpresent:
realorimaginedmattersinthepast,orfutureorinfar-awayplaces.Inotherwords,languagecanrefertocontextsmovedfromtheimmediatesituationsofthespeaker.Thispropertyoflanguageprovidesspeake