工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx

上传人:b****7 文档编号:16013553 上传时间:2023-07-09 格式:DOCX 页数:10 大小:23.09KB
下载 相关 举报
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共10页
工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共10页
亲,该文档总共10页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx

《工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献.docx

工程造价中英文对照外文翻译文献

(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)

中英文对照翻译

RiskAnalysisoftheInternationalConstructionProject

ABSTRACT

ThisanalysisusedacasestudymethodologytoanalysetheissuessurroundingthepartialcollapseoftheroofofabuildinghousingtheheadquartersoftheStandardsAssociationofZimbabwe(SAZ).Inparticular,itexaminedthepriorrolesplayedbytheteamofconstructionprofessionals.TheanalysisrevealedthattheSAZ’straditionalconstructionprojectwasgenerallycharacterizedbyhighrisk.Therewasaclearindicationofthefailureofacontractorandarchitectsinpreventingand/ormitigatingpotentialconstructionproblemsasallegedbytheplaintiff.Itwasreasonabletoconcludethatbetweenthemthedefectsshouldhavebeendetectedearlierandrectifiedingoodtimebeforethepartialrooffailure.Itappearedjustifiedfortheplaintifftohavebroughtanegligenceclaimagainstboththecontractorandthearchitects.Theriskanalysisfacilitated,throughitsmulti-dimensionalapproachtoacriticalexaminationofaconstructionproblem,theidentificationofaneffectiveriskmanagementstrategyforfutureconstructionprojects.Itfurtherservedtoemphasizethepointthatclientsarebecomingmoredemanding,morediscerning,andlesswillingtoacceptriskwithoutrecompense.Clientsdonotwantsurprise,andaremorelikelytoengageinlitigationwhenthingsgowrong.

KEYWORDS:

Arbitration,claims,construction,contracts,litigation,projectandrisk

ThestructuraldesignofthereinforcedconcreteelementswasdonebyconsultingengineersKnightPiesold(KP).QuantitysurveyingserviceswereprovidedbyHawkins,Leshnick&Bath(HLB).ThecontractwasawardedtoCentralAfricanBuildingCorporation(CABCO)whowasalsoresponsiblefortheprovisionofaspecialistroofstructureusingpatented“gangnail”rooftrusses.ThebuildingconstructionproceededtocompletionandwashandedovertotheownersonSept.12,1991.TheSAZtookeffectiveoccupationoftheheadquartersbuildingwithoutacertificateofoccupation.Also,thedefectsliabilityperiodwasonlythreemonths.

Theroofstructurewasinplace10yearsbeforepartialfailureinDecember1999.Thebuildinginsurancecoveragedidnotcoverenough,theCityofHarare,agovernmentmunicipality,issuedthecertificateofoccupation10yearsafteroccupation,andafterpartialcollapseoftheroof.

AtfirsttheSAZdecidedtogotoarbitration,butthisfailedtoyieldanimmediatesolution.TheSAZthendecidedtoproceedtolitigateincourtandtobringanegligenceclaimagainstCABCO.Thepreparationforarbitrationwasreusedforlitigation.TheSAZ’squantifiedlossesstoodatapproximately$6millioninZimbabwedollars(US$1.2m).

Afterallpartieshadexaminedthefactsandevidencebeforethem,itbecameclearthattherewasagreatprobabilitythatthecourtsmightrulethatboththearchitectsandthecontractorwereliable.Itwasatthisstagethatthedefendants’lawyersrequestedthatthematterbesettledoutofcourt.Theplaintiffagreedtothissuggestion,withthetermsofthesettlementkeptconfidential.

TheaimofthiscriticalanalysiswastoanalysetheissuessurroundingthepartialcollapseoftheroofofthebuildinghousingtheHQofStandardAssociationofZimbabwe.Itexaminedthepriorrolesplayedbytheprojectmanagementfunctionandconstructionprofessionalsinpreventing/mitigatingpotentialconstructionproblems.Itfurtherassessedtheextenttowhichtheemployer/clientandpartiestoaconstructioncontractareabletorecoverdamagesunderthatcontract.Themainobjectiveofthiscriticalanalysiswastoidentifyaneffectiveriskmanagementstrategyforfutureconstructionprojects.Theimportanceofthisstudyisitsmultidimensionalexaminationapproach.

Experiencesuggeststhatparticipantsinaprojectarewellabletoidentifyrisksbasedontheirownexperience.Theadoptionofariskmanagementapproach,basedsolelyinpastexperienceanddependantonjudgement,mayworkreasonablywellinastablelowriskenvironment.Itisunlikelytobeeffectivewherethereisachange.Thisisbecausechangerequirestheextrapolationofpastexperience,whichcouldbemisleading.Allconstructionprojectsareprototypestosomeextentandimplychange.Changeintheconstructionindustryitselfsuggeststhatpastexperienceisunlikelytobesufficientonitsown.Astructuredapproachisrequired.Suchastructurecannotandmustnotreplacetheexperienceandexpertiseoftheparticipant.Rather,itbringsadditionalbenefitsthatassisttoclarifyobjectives,identifythenatureoftheuncertainties,introduceseffectivecommunicationsystems,improvesdecision-making,introduceseffectiveriskcontrolmeasures,protectstheprojectobjectivesandprovidesknowledgeoftheriskhistory.

Constructionprofessionalsneedtoknowhowtobalancethecontingenciesofriskwiththeirspecificcontractual,financial,operationalandorganizationalrequirements.Manyconstructionprofessionalslookatrisksindividuallywithamyopiclensanddonotrealizethepotentialimpactthatotherassociatedrisksmayhaveontheirbusinessoperations.Usingaholisticriskmanagementapproachwillenableafirmtoidentifyalloftheorganization’sbusinessrisks.Thiswillincreasetheprobabilityofriskmitigation,withtheultimategoaloftotalriskelimination.

Recommendedkeyconstructionandriskmanagementstrategiesforfutureconstructionprojectshavebeenconsideredandtheirexplanationfollows.J.W.Hincheystatedthatthereisandcanbeno‘bestpractice’standardforriskallocationonahigh-profileprojectorforthatmatter,anyproject.Hesaid,instead,successfulriskmanagementisamind-setandaprocess.AccordingtoHinchey,theidealmind-setisforthepartiesandtheirrepresentativesto,first,beintentionalaboutidentifyingprojectrisksandthentoproceedtodevelopasystematicandcomprehensiveprocessforavoiding,mitigating,managingandfinallyallocating,bycontract,thoserisksinoptimumwaysfortheparticularproject.Thisprocessissaidtonecessarilybeginasascienceandendsasanart.

AccordingtoD.Atkinson,whethercontractor,consultantorpromoter,therightteamneedstobeassembledwiththerelevantmulti-disciplinaryexperienceofthatparticulartypeofprojectanditslocation.Thisissaidtobenecessarynotonlytoallowalternativeresponsestobeexplored.Butalsotoensurethattherightquestionsareaskedandthemajorrisksidentified.Headsofsourcesofriskaresaidtobeaconvenientwayofprovidingastructureforidentifyingriskstocompletionofaparticipant’spartoftheproject.Effectiveriskmanagementissaidtorequireamulti-disciplinaryapproach.Inevitablyriskmanagementrequiresexaminationofengineering,legalandinsurancerelatedsolutions.

Itisstatedthattheuseofanalyticaltechniquesbasedonastatisticalapproachcouldbeofenormoususeindecisionmaking.Manyofthesetechniquesaresaidtoberelevanttoestimationoftheconsequencesofriskevents,andnothowallocationofriskistobeachieved.Inaddition,atthepresentstageofthedevelopmentofriskmanagement,Atkinsonstatesthatitmustberecognizedthatmajordecisionswillbemadethatcannotbebasedsolelyonmathematicalanalysis.Thecomplexityofconstructionprojectsmeansthattheprojectdefinitionintermsofbothphysicalformandorganizationalstructurewillbebasedonconsiderationofonlyarelativelysmallnumberofrisks.Thisissaidtothenallowageneralstructuredapproachthatcanbeappliedtoanyconstructionprojecttoincreasetheawarenessofparticipants.

Thenew,simplifiedConstructionDesignandManagementRegulations(CDMRegulations)whichcameintoforceintheUKinApril2007,revisedandbroughttogethertheexistingCDM1994andtheConstructionHealthSafetyandWelfare(CHSW)Regulations1996,intoasingleregulatorypackage.

ThenewCDMregulationsofferanopportunityforastepchangeinhealthandsafetyperformanceandareusedtoreemphasizethehealth,safetyandbroaderbusinessbenefitsofawell-managedandco-ordinatedapproachtothemanagementofhealthandsafetyinconstruction.Ibelievethatthedevelopmentoftheseskillsisimperativetoprovidetheclientwiththemosteffectiveservicesavailable,deliveringthebestvalueprojectpossible.

ConstructionManagementatRisk(CMatRisk),similartoestablishedprivatesectormethodsofconstructioncontracting,isgainingpopularityinthepublicsector.Itisaprocessthatallowsaclienttoselectaconstructionmanager(CM)basedonqualifications;maketheCMamemberofacollaborativeprojectteam;centralizeresponsibilityforconstructionunderasinglecontract;obtainabondedguaranteedmaximumprice;produceamoremanageable,predictableproject;savetimeandmoney;andreduceriskfortheclient,thearchitectandtheCM.

CMatRisk,amoreprofessionalapproachtoconstruction,istakingitsplacealongwithdesign-build,bridgingandthemoretraditionalprocessofdesign-bid-buildasanestablishedmethodofprojectdelivery.

TheAEcanreviewtheCM’sapproachtothework,makinghelpfulrecommendations.TheCMisallowedtotakebidsorproposalsfromsubcontractorsduringcompletionofcontractdocuments,priortotheguaranteedmaximumprice(GMP),whichreducestheCM’sriskandprovidesusefulinputtodesign.Theprocedureismoremethodical,manageable,predictableandlessriskyforall.

Theprocurementofconstructionisalsomorebusiness-like.Eachtradecontractorhasafairshotatbeingthelowbidderwithoutfearofbidshopping.Eachmustdeliverthebesttogettheprojec.Competitioninthecommunityismoreequitable:

al

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 党团工作 > 思想汇报心得体会

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2