外文翻译.docx

上传人:b****1 文档编号:2037965 上传时间:2023-05-02 格式:DOCX 页数:38 大小:615.18KB
下载 相关 举报
外文翻译.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第17页
第17页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第18页
第18页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第19页
第19页 / 共38页
外文翻译.docx_第20页
第20页 / 共38页
亲,该文档总共38页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

外文翻译.docx

《外文翻译.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译.docx(38页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

外文翻译.docx

外文翻译

附录

原文:

Dividendpayouts:

EvidencefromU.S.bankholdingcompaniesinthecontextofthefinancialcrisis

JoséFilipeAbreu,MohamedAzzimGulamhussen

Abstract

Westudydividendpayoutsof462U.S.bankholdingcompaniesbeforeandduringthe2007–09financialcrisis.FamaandFrench(2001)characteristics(size,profitabilityandgrowthopportunities)explaindividendpayoutsbeforeandduringthefinancialcrisis.Theagencycosthypothesisexplainsdividendpayoutsbeforeandduring(morepronouncedly)thefinancialcrisis.Thesignalinghypothesisexplainsdividendpayoutsduringthefinancialcrisis.Regulatorypressurewasineffectiveinlimitingdividendpayoutsbyundercapitalizedbanksbeforethefinancialcrisis.Ourfindingshaveimplicationsforcorporatefinanceandgovernancetheories,andalsofortheregulatoryreformsthatarebeingdiscussedamongpolicymakers.

1.Introduction

Researchersapplycorporatefinanceandgovernancetheoriestofinancialfirmsonthegroundsoftheinherentinterplayofinterestsofawidersetofstakeholders(depositorsandregulators,aswellasshareholdersandmanagers),whichmaketheiragencyandgovernanceproblemsmorecomplex,andtherelevanceoffinancialfirmsforthegoodfunctioningandsoundnessofmodernfinancialsystems(see,amongothers,AndersonandCampbell,2004;Brooketal.,2000).Thefinancialcrisishasfurtherenhancedtheinterestintheapplicationofcorporatefinanceandgovernancetheoriesduetotheuniquemacroeconomiccontextandtheregulatoryshiftwhichisbelievedtohavehitfinancialfirmsthemost(see,forexample,Erkensetal.,2012).Wecontributetothisemergingstrandintheliteraturebystudyingbanks'dividendpayoutdecisionsbeforeandduringthefinancialcrisis.Oftheseveralcorporatefinanceandgovernanceissuesthatareattractingtheattentionofscholars,dividendpolicyisreceivingsignificantattention,particularlyfromregulatorsandinvestors.TherecentproposalstoincreaseoversightofthedividendpayoutsbytheFederalReserveBoard(FRB,2011)andtheBaselCommitteeonBankingSupervision(BCBS,2011)pointtowardstheincreasingregulatoryrelevanceofbanks'dividendpayoutpolicy.Forcingbankstoplowbacktheirearningsmayhoweverhavetheunintendedconsequenceofreducingtheirabilitytobothsignaltheirfuturegrowthprospectstosuppliersofdebtandequity,andreduceagencyconflictsoftheirmanagerswithdispersedshareholders.Ourpapershedscriticallightonthetensionbetweenthedividendpayoutdecisions(beforeand)duringthefinancialcrisisbyexplicitlyconsideringthemajorregulatoryshiftsthatoccurredduringthisperiod.

Dividendpolicyinthecontextoffinancialfirmshasbeenaddressedtosomeextentpreviously.WesummarizethemainstudiesinTable1.Forexample,FilbeckandMullineaux(1993),Collinsetal.(1994)andBoldinandLeggett(1995)testthesignalinghypothesisandtheevidencelargelyindicatesthatdividendsareusedasasignalingmechanismbybanks.Thesestudiesdonotaccountfortheinfluenceofregulatorypressure.AnexceptionthoughisTheisandDutta(2009)whointheirstudyontheinfluenceoftheinsideownershipondividendpayoutcontrolforthelevelofcapitalizationofbanks.WeextendthesestudiesbyconsideringtheFamaandFrench(2001)characteristicsofdividendpayers,andtheagencycosthypothesisalongsidethepreviouslytestedsignalinghypothesis.

Table1

Selectedliteratureonthedeterminantsofdividends.

ThistablesynthesizesselectedliteratureonthedeterminantsofdividendsforU.S.bankholdingcompanies.

 

Wetestfourhypothesesinthepresentstudy:

(i)theapplicabilityofFamaandFrench's(2001)characteristicsofdividendpayers(size,profitabilityandgrowthopportunities);(ii)thesignalinghypothesis,whichstatesthatdividendsareusedasanindicatoroffutureprospects;(iii)theagencycosthypothesis,whichstatesthatdividendscounterbalancetheincreasedneedformonitoringassociatedwithindependentbanks;and(iv)theregulatorypressurehypothesis,whichstatesthatundercapitalizedbankstendtoretainearningsratherthanpaydividends.Theanalysiscoverstwodistinctmacroeconomicenvironments:

beforeandduringthefinancialcrisis.Thesampleincludes462U.S.bankholdingcompaniesandcontains435observationsmadebeforethefinancialcrisis(i.e.,from2004to2006)and441observationsmadeduringthefinancialcrisis(i.e.,from2007to2009),foratotalof876observations.FocusingontheU.S.providesalargedataset,whilerestrictingthesampletobankholdingcompaniesreducestheproblemsassociatedwithunobservedheterogeneity.

3.Sample,variablesanddescriptivestatistics

Wecollectedfirm-leveldatafromBankscopeforU.S.listedbankholdingcompanieswithminimumtotalassetsof100millionUSD,whichyielded462institutions.Banksthatenteredbankruptcyduringthefinancialcrisiswerenotconsidered.Oursamplespanstwodistinctmacroeconomicenvironments:

theperiodbeforethefinancialcrisis,from2004to2006(435observations),andtheperiodduringthefinancialcrisis,from2007to2009(441observations).Thefinalsampleisanunbalancedpanelwithatotalof876observations.

Weusedthedividendpayout(dividendpayout)asthedependentvariableandconstructeditbyaveragingthedividend-to-totalassetratioforeachreferenceperiod.Weusedtotalassetstoscaledividendstoensurethattheresultswerenotdrivenbystockpriceandearningvolatilityassociatedwiththefinancialcrisis.Wefocusonthecharacteristicsofregulardividendpayoutsratherthanonthepredictionofthenextyear'sdividend.Therefore,weuseanaveragingperiodthatislongerthanoneyear.Weoptathree-yearaveragingperiodfortwomainreasons.First,thischoiceavoidstheimpactofthe2003taxcutondividendpayoutsintheU.S.(see,amongothers,Brownetal.,2007).Second,athree-yearperiodcoversthetimespanoftheentirefinancialcrisis(2007to2009).

Thesignalinghypothesisstatesthatbankswithpositivefuturegrowthopportunities(expectedgrowth)areexpectedtopayouthigherdividendstosignaltheirbanks'prospectsandincreasetheirpotentialtoattractdebtandequityfinancingwhenrequired;thereforeapositiverelationshipbetweenexpectedgrowthanddividendpayoutisexpected.Conversely,justlikehistoricalgrowth,bankswithpositivefuturegrowthopportunities(expectedgrowth)willplowbacktheirearningstoavoidcostlydebtandequityfinancing;thereforeanegativerelationshipisexpectedbetweenexpectedgrowthanddividendpayout.Thus,therelationshipbetweenexpectedgrowthanddividendpayoutcanbepositiveornegative.Wemeasuredexpectedgrowththroughtheratioofmarket-to-bookvalueofequityattheendoftheobservationperiod.Thesignalinghypothesiscannotberejectedifthecoefficientassociatedwithexpectedgrowthispositiveandstatisticallysignificant.

Theagencycosthypothesisstatesthatdividendscounterbalancetheincreasedneedformonitoringassociatedwithbankswithdispersedshareholders.Ahighdegreeofindependenceisassociatedwithsevereconflictsofinterestbetweenshareholdersandmanagers,whichexacerbatetheagencycostsandtheconsequentneedfortightermonitoring;thereforeapositiverelationshipisexpectedbetweenindependenceanddividendpayouts.WeusedthecommonlydeployedIndependenceIndicator(independence)developedbyBankscopetocapturetheeffectofagencycosts.Thisindicatorclassifiesthedegreeofindependenceoffirmsfromtheirshareholders.Basedonthedatafortheendoftheperiodunderanalysis,thedummyindependenceassumesavalueofunityforthemostindependentbanksandzeroforalltheothers(bankswithblockshareholders).Theagencycosthypothesiscannotberejectedifthecoefficientassociatedwithindependenceispositiveandstatisticallysignificant.

Sincebanksareregulated,andmajorregulatoryshiftsoccurredduringourreferenceperiod2004–09,itisnecessarytocontrolfortheirinfluenceinourmodel.Thedegreeofregulatorypressureshouldcapturethedifferencesinthedividendpayoutsacrossdistinctdegreesofcapitalizationandriskappetites.Theassumptionisthatbankswith(risk-weighted)capitalratiosbeloworclosetotheminimumrequirementswillbesubjecttoclosermonitoringbytheirsupervisors(seeSection1).Previousstudiescapturedtheeffectofregulatorypressurebydeployingtheratioofequitytototalassets.However,becauseregulatorscloselyfollowtheregulatorydefinitionofcapital,wemeasuredregulatorypressure(capitalization)astheaverageofthetier1leverageratio(tier1capitaltoassets)duringthereferenceperiod.Lowerleverage(i.e.,highervaluesforcapitalization)signalsstrongerfinancialhealthandisexpectedtobeassociatedwithhigherdividendpayouts.Therefore,apositiverelationshipisexpectedbetweencapitalizationanddividendpayout.

Additionally,weincludedadummyvariableforregulatorypressurebasedonthecapitalcategoriesoftheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationImprovementAct(FDICIA).14Section131oftheFDICIAestablishesasystemofpromptcorrectiveactions

derivedfromaclassificationsystemthatdividesbanksintofivecategories:

“wellcapitalized”,“adequatelycapitalized”,“undercapitalized”,“substantiallyundercapitalized”and“criticallyundercapitalized.”Banksareclassifiedaccordingtothresholdsusingrisk-basedcapitalandleverageratiosasthebasis.Themajorityofthebanksinoursamplewereclassifiedas“wellcapitalized”.Weconsiderthatregulatorsincreasetheirpressureonbankswhenbanksareapproachingtheminimumlevelsofcapitalandnotonlywhenthose

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 总结汇报 > 工作总结汇报

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2