Project MATCH baseline data set and the Project MATCH Reliability StudyWord文档格式.docx

Project MATCH baseline data set and the Project MATCH Reliability StudyWord文档格式.docx

《Project MATCH baseline data set and the Project MATCH Reliability StudyWord文档格式.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Project MATCH baseline data set and the Project MATCH Reliability StudyWord文档格式.docx（17页珍藏版）》请在冰点文库上搜索。

Relatedreferenceworkarticles 

AbstractAbstract|Figures/TablesFigures/Tables|ReferencesReferences

Abstract

Projectmanagementstrategyinthepublicsectorhasattractedtheinterestofmanyscholarssincethelate1980s,followingthegrowingpressureongovernmentstoabandonbureaucraticorganisationsinfavourofleanerstructures.ThoughItalyisconsideredalatedeveloperinthismovement,itsscope,speedandconsistencyofreformsisconsideredremarkable[OECD,（2001）,ReviewsofRegulatoryReforminItaly].WithinthiscontextmanyprojectshavebeenundertakentryingtoimplementtheideasofNewPublicManagement（NPM）[PublicAdministration（1991）69:

3;

Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety（1995）20:

93].ThispaperreportsonareengineeringprojectcarriedoutattheItalianMinistryofTreasurywhichtestedamethodologydrawnfromtheliteratureofprocessengineering.Multipledimensionsandactionsprovedtobecrucialinmanagingtheproject:

thepaperdiscussesthemandtheirrelativeimportanceoverthelifeofthereengineeringproject.

ArticleOutline

1.Introduction

2.TheItaliancontext

2.1.Businessprocessreengineering

3.Results

3.1.Europeanstructuralfundsandtheministryoftreasury

3.2.Dimensionsandactions

4.Conclusions

References

Purchase

$31.50

336

Socialpracticesandthemanagementofknowledgeinprojectenvironments 

InternationalJournalofProjectManagement,Volume21,Issue3,April2003,Pages157-166

MikeBresnen,LindaEdelman,SueNewell,HarryScarbrough,JackySwan

AbstractAbstract|ReferencesReferences

Increasingly,theimportanceofsocialaspectsofknowledgeretentionandtransferhasbeenemphasisedintheliteratureonmanagingknowledge,withtherecognitionthatknowledgeisoftentacitandsituatedandembeddedwithinparticularsocialgroupsandsituations.Thishasconsiderablerelevanceforunderstandingattemptstomanageknowledgeinsettingswhereactivityandlearningareproject-based.Knowledgemanagementinsuchacontextfacesmanychallenges,duetotheone-offnatureofprojectworkandthemanyresultingdiscontinuitiesinmethodsoforganisationandflowsofpersonnel,materialsandinformation.Oneimportantconsequenceisthatsocialprocessespotentiallyplayanimportantpartinthediffusionandtransferofknowledgeandlearning.Thispapersetsouttoexaminethesignificanceofsocialfactorsinenhancingknowledgemanagementcapabilitiesinsuchanenvironment,drawinguponcasestudyresearchfromtheconstructionindustry.Themainfindingfromtheresearchisthatprocessesofknowledgecapture,transferandlearninginprojectsettingsrelyveryheavilyuponsocialpatterns,practicesandprocessesinwayswhichemphasisethevalueandimportanceofadoptingacommunity-basedapproachtomanagingknowledge.

2.Managingknowledgeinprojectenvironments

3.Researchaimsandmethodology

4.Theregionalengineeringmanager（REM）project

4.1.Thecontextoftheproject

4.2.Networkingandmodesofcommunication

4.3.Enablersandbarrierstoknowledgecaptureanddiffusion

4.3.1.Organisationalstructureeffects

4.3.2.Culturalcontextandtheclimateforchange

4.3.3.Skillsandcapabilities

4.3.4.Communications,networksandinformationflows

4.3.5.Technologicalmechanisms

4.3.6.Objectivesandoutputs

5.Discussion

6.Conclusion

337

IssuesintheDevelopmentofReliableMeasuresinAddictionsResearch:

IntroductiontoProjectMATCHAssessmentStrategies 

PsychologyofAddictiveBehaviors,Volume10,Issue2,June1996,Pages67-74

FrancesK.DelBoca,JaniceM.Brown

Noabstractisavailableforthisarticle.

$30.00

Thisarticleprovidesanintroductiontothe5instrumentarticlesinthisspecialsection,eachofwhichpresentsapsychometricevaluationofaself-administeredquestionnairedevelopedforuseinaddictionstreatmentresearch.Anoverviewofmeasurementtheoryispresented,andsocial–psychologicalfactorsthataffectreliabilityandvalidityareconsidered.Theinstrumentsevaluatedinthisissuearesummarized,andthe2commondatasourcesforthe5reports,theProjectMATCHbaselinedatasetandtheProjectMATCHReliabilityStudy,aredescribed.Thearticleconcludeswithabriefsummarythatoffersrecommendationsregardinghowpsychometricinvestigationsshouldbeundertakenandappliedtothedevelopmentofself-reportquestionnairesinaddictionsresearch.

338

Hybridnumericalmethodsinstaticanddynamicfracturemechanics 

OpticsandLasersinEngineering,Volume32,Issue3,September1999,Pages205-255

ToshihisaNishioka

Inthisarticle,theconceptofthehybridnumericalmethodsisclarified.Onthebasisofthisconcept,varioushybridnumericalmethodsusedinstaticanddynamicfracturemechanicsareclassifiedintofivecategories:

（i）hybridexperimental–numericalmethods,（ii）hybridnumerical–experimentalmethods,（iii）hybridanalytical–numericalmethods,（iv）hybridnumerical–analyticalmethods,and（v）hybridnumerical–numericalmethods.Featuresofeachcategoryofhybridnumericalmethodarepresentedwithpertinentnumericalresults.

2.Conceptofhybridnumericalmethods

2.1.Stateofhybridization

3.Hybridanalytical–numericalmethods

3.1.Movingsingularelementmethod

3.2.Superpositionmethod

3.3.Alternatingmethod

3.3.1.TheVNAsolution

3.3.2.Alternatingmethodforinteractingmultipleellipticalcracksininfinitebodies

3.3.3.Finite-elementalternatingmethodforellipticalcrackproblems

4.Hybridnumerical–analyticalmethods

5.Hybridexperimental–numericalmethods

5.1.Typesoffracturesimulation

5.2.Variousdynamicfracturesimulations

5.2.1.Dynamiccrackpropagationandarrest

5.2.2.Fastcurvingcrackpropagation

5.3.Hybridmoiré

-interferometryandfinite-elementmethod

6.Hybridnumerical–experimentalmethods

6.1.ThemethodofcausticsforthemeasurementoftheT*integral

7.Hybridnumerical–numericalmethods

7.1.Hybridboundary-elementandfinite-elementmethods

7.1.1.CouplingofFEMwithdirectBEM

7.1.2.CouplingofFEMwithindirectBEM

7.2.Otherhybridnumerical–numericalmethods

8.Concludingremarks

Acknowledgements

$39.95

339

Publicinvolvementinmulti-objectivewaterlevelregulationdevelopmentprojects—evaluatingtheapplicabilityofpublicinvolvementmethods 

EnvironmentalImpactAssessmentReview,Volume25,Issue3,April2005,Pages281-304

AriVä

ntä

nen,MikaMarttunen

Publicinvolvementisaprocessthatinvolvesthepublicinthedecisionmakingofanorganization,forexampleamunicipalityoracorporation.Ithasdevelopedintoawidelyacceptedandrecommendedpolicyinenvironmentalteringprojects.TheEUWaterFrameworkDirective（WFD）tookforcein2000andstressestheimportanceofpublicinvolvementincomposingriverbasinmanagementplans.Therefore,theneedtodeveloppublicinvolvementmethodsfordifferentsituationsandcircumstancesisevident.

ThispaperdescribeshowvariouspublicinvolvementmethodshavebeenappliedinadevelopmentprojectinvolvingthemostheavilyregulatedlakeinFinland.Theobjectiveoftheprojectwastoassessthepositiveandnegativeimpactsofregulationandtofindpossibilitiesforalleviatingtheadverseimpactsonrecreationaluseandtheaquaticecosystem.Anexceptionaleffortwasmadetowardspublicinvolvement,whichwascloselyconnectedtoplanninganddecisionmaking.Theappliedmethodswere

（1）steeringgroupwork,

（2）survey,（3）dialogue,（4）themeinterviews,（5）publicmeetingand（6）workshops.Theinformationgatheredusingthesemethodswasutilizedindifferentstagesoftheproject,e.g.,inidentifyingtheregulationimpacts,comparingalternativesandcompilingtherecommendationsforregulationdevelopment.

Afterdescribingourcaseandtheresultsfromtheappliedpublicinvolvementmethods,wewilldiscussourexperiencesandthefeedbackfromthepublic.Wewillalsocriticallyevaluateourownsuccessincopingwithpublicinvolvementchallenges.Inadditiontothat,wepresentgeneralrecommendationsfordealingwiththeseproblematicissuesbasedonourexperiences,whichprovidenewinsightsforapplyingvariouspublicinvolvementmethodsinmulti-objectivedecisionmakingprojects.

2.LakeKemijä

rvi—developingFinland'

sheaviestlakeregulation

3.PublicinvolvementintheLakeKemijä

rvicase

4.Experiences,feedbackandresults

4.1.Survey

4.2.Themeinterviews

4.3.Dialogue

4.4.Publicmeeting

4.5.Workshops

4.6.Steeringgroup

5.Conclusion