TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx

上传人:聆听****声音 文档编号:675557 上传时间:2023-04-29 格式:DOCX 页数:43 大小:62.24KB
下载 相关 举报
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第17页
第17页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第18页
第18页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第19页
第19页 / 共43页
TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx_第20页
第20页 / 共43页
亲,该文档总共43页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx

《TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx(43页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

TheHealthofNations-DepartmentofEconomicsWord文件下载.docx

I.Introduction

Nationsgenerallymeasuretheireconomicperformanceusingtheyardstickofnationaloutputandincome.Itisnotwidelyrecognized,however,thatconventionalapproachesdoapoorjobofcapturingimprovementsinthehealthofthepopulationinourgrossdomesticproductorincomespercapita.Howwouldstandardeconomicmeasureschangeiftheyadequatelyreflectedimprovementsinthehealthstatusofthepopulationaswellasothergoodsandservices?

Thisisthequestionaddressedinthepresentstudy.

Thefirstsectiondiscussesthetheoryofthemeasurementofnationalincome,examinessomeoftheshortcomingsoftraditionalconcepts,andproposesanewconceptthatcanbeusedtoincorporateimprovementsinhealthstatus.Inthesecondsection,wediscusshowtheproposedmeasurefitsintoexistingtheoriesofconsumptionandvaluation.ThethirdsectionappliestheconceptstotheUnitedStatesoverthetwentiethcentury.

Attheend,weconcludethataccountingforimprovementsinthehealthstatusofthepopulationwouldmakeasubstantialdifferencetoourmeasuresofeconomicwelfareoverthetwentiethcenturyintheUnitedStates.

II.IncludingHealthStatusinMeasuresNationalIncome

CurrentApproachestoMeasuringtheContributionofHealthintheNationalAccounts

WhiletheGDPandtherestoftheNationalIncomeandProduct

Accounts(NIPA)mayseemtobearcaneconcepts,theyaretrulyamongthegreatinventionsofthetwentiethcentury.Muchasasatelliteinspacecansurveytheweatheracrossanentirecontinent,socantheGDPgiveanoverallpictureofthestateoftheeconomy.SincetheirfirstconstructionbySimonKuznets,whowontheNobelprizeinEconomicsforhiscontributionstonationalincomeaccounting,enormousstrideshavebeentakenindevelopingandimprovingindexesofeconomicwelfare.Startingwithrudimentarymeasuresofnationalincomeandoutput,nationsnowhaveawiderangeofindexesthatnotonlyincludeconventionalconceptsbutalsodisaggregatetheseforindustriesandregions,useimprovedtechniquesforaggregation,anddisplayawealthofdetail.

Nevertheless,sincethebeginning,therehavebeenconcernsthattheaccountsareincompleteandmisleadingbecausetheyomitmostnonmarketactivity.Tomeetthiscriticism,privatescholarsaswellasofficialstatisticalagencieshavebegunextendingthenationalaccountstoincludeseveralnonmarketsectors,includingnationalresources,theenvironment,transportation,leisuretime,andunpaidwork. SeeEisner[1989].ArecentreviewofenvironmentalandotheraspectsofnonmarketaccountingiscontainedinNationalResearchCouncil[1999].

Onequestionthathasbeenvirtuallyignoredinattemptstoextendthenationalaccountsistheneedtoaccountadequatelyforimprovementsinhumanhealth.Itislittleunderstoodoutsidethepriesthoodofnationalaccountantsthatthereisnoseriousattempttomeasurethezzrealoutput"

ofthehealth-careindustry.Thetechniquesusedtomeasurethepriceandquantityofhealthcarearehighlydefective,andtherearenoattemptstoaccountforimprovementsinthelengthoflifeintocurrentmeasuresoflivingstandards.

Itmightbearguedthatincludinghealthstatusissomeradical,far-out,andwoolly-headedattempttoincorporateintangible,non-economiczandsociologicalmeasuresintooursocialaccounts.Thisargumentiswrong,forhealth-careexpendituresarealreadyincludedinmeasuresofnationalincomeandoutput.IndeedtheyareagrowingfractionofGDP-thefractionofpersonalconsumptionexpendituresdevotedtomedicalcarerosefrom5.1percentin1959to15.3percentin1998.Whatisradicalisnottheinclusionofhealthcarebutthenotionadvancedherethatweshouldmakeaseriousattempttomeasuretheoutputofthehealthcaresectorandtovaluethisoutputcorrectly.

Bothcommonsenseandrecenteconomicstudiessuggestthatthereislittleconnectionbetweenmedicalspendingandthemeasuredeconomicvalueofhealth-statusimprovements.Atacommon-senselevel,thelackofconnectioncomesbecause"

real"

medical-carespendinginfactmeasuresspendingoninputsratherthantheresultsinhealthoutcomes.Thecurrentapproachistomeasurehealthoutputprimarilybythenumberofphysicianvisits,thenumberofhospital-days,andsimilarmeasuresratherthantheactualdeliveryofservicesorchangesinhealthstatus.Itwillcomeasasurprisetomostnon-economiststhatimprovementsthatcomefromnewproducts,suchasthediscoveryofantibioticsorthesubstitutionofdrugsforinvasivesurgery,arecompletelyomittedincurrentmeasuresofrealoutput.

Attemptstomeasureimprovementsinthehealthstatusofthepopulation—includingeverythingfromvaccinations,microsurgery,andnewdrugstoairbags,exercise,andanti-cigarettesadvertizing—poseanewanddifficultchallengetomeasuringnationalincome.Recently,economistshavebegunprovidingbetteroutcome-orientedestimatesofthepricesandoutputsinthissector.OneofthemoststrikingfindingscomesfromastudybyCutleretal.,whoestimatedthatatruepriceindexforthetreatmentofheartattackswouldriseabout5.5percentperyearmoreslowlythanthecorrespondingcomponentoftheCPL Cutler,McClellan,Newhouse,andRemler[1998].

SimilarresultswerefoundinstudiesoftreatmentforglaucomabyShapiroandWilcoxandforcataractsurgerybyShapiro,Shapiro,andWilcox. SeeShapiroandWilcox[1997,1999].

Giventhelikelihoodthatwearedramaticallymismeasuring,andalmostcertainlyunderestimating,thecontributionofimprovementsinhealthcaretoeconomicwelfare,thisraisesthequestionofhowtoproceedtoobtainbetterestimates.Oneapproachwouldbetocontinuetheapproachjustdescribedofconstructingbettermeasuresofoutputandpricestoreflectthe(literal)declineinthecostofliving.ThisapproachwasadoptedbytheBoskinCommissionandisthethrustofmuchcurrentresearchonhealtheconomics.SeeAdvisoryCommission[1996]andMurrayandLopez[1996].

Anotherquitedifferentapproach,whichisusedinthepresentstudy,istoobtaindirectmeasuresofhealthstatus,weightthemwithappropriateprices,andthenestimatethevalueofimprovementsinhealthstatus.Thisapproachtreatsmedicalcareasaninstrumentalinputandsubtractsitfromconsumptionexpenditures.Wewouldinsteadadjustrealincometoreflectthevalueoftheimprovementofhealthstatus.Thisapproachisactuallymuchsimplerthan"

fixing"

priceandoutputindexesbecausemeasuresofhealthstatusaregenerallymuchbetterthandataontheimpactsofparticulartechnologiesonhealthstatus.Wewillseethatfollowingthispathhasradicalimpactsonourmeasuresofrealincomeandoutput.

AlternativeMeasuresofNationalIncome

Beforeproposingalternativeconcepts,itwillbeusefultodescribedifferentapproachestomeasuringnationalincome.Theconceptsofsocialincomeandnationalincomegobackcenturies.Theyarelargelybasedontheanalogousdefinitionsofindividualincomewithappropriateadjustmentsforaggregationandnationalboundaries.Wecandistinguishtwofundamentallydifferentapproachestomeasuringincome-onebasedonproductionandonebasedonutility.(Utilityinthiscontextmeanspreferences,notusefulness.)Theformeristhebasisofmodernnational-incomeaccountingwhilethelatterismoreappropriatewhenconsideringsustainableincomeandthecontributionofimprovementinhealthstatus.

Production-basedmeasures(HicksianIncome)

ThemodemtreatmentofsocialincomedatesfromthewritingsofJ.R.Hicks.Wheneconomistsandaccountantsmeasurenationalincome,theyhavealmostuniversallyrelyupontheHicksiandefinition.ThediscussionofsocialincomeinValueandCapitalstates,"

Thepurposeofincomecalculationsinpracticalaffairsistogivepeopleanindicationoftheamountwhichtheycanconsumewithoutimpoverishingthemselves.'

*Hicksthengoesontoprovidehisfirstdefinitionofsocialincome:

IncomeNo.1isthusthemaximumamountwhichcanbespentduringaperiodifthereistobeanexpectationofmaintainingintactthecapitalvalueofprospectivereturns...;

itequalsConsumptionplusCapitalaccumulation. Hicks[1939],p.172.

Hicks[1939],p.173,178,emphasisadded.ThisdiscussionignoresthesubtletyofHicks'

discussionofpricechanges,interestrateeffects,thedifferencebetweenexanteandexpostcapital,andanumberofotherfactors.

Thisdefinitioniswhatiscalled/zHicksianincome"

-themaximumamountthatcanbeconsumedwhileleavingcapitalintact.Inpractice,thismeansthatincomeequalsconsumptionplusageneralizedmeasureofcapitalaccumulation.

TheHicksianconceptisthestandarddefinitionofnetnationalordomesticproductusedinthenational-incomeaccountsofvirtuallyallnationstoday,whereconsumptionandinvestmentarelimitedtothoselegalgoodsandservicesthatpassthroughthemarketplace.Itisproduction-basedinthesensethatitattemptstomeasuretherateofproductionatagiventime.Suchmeasuresarenotconcernedwiththehealthstatusofthepopulationorwhetherpeopleareenjoyingthatproductionforalongerperiodoftime.

Utilitv-basedmeasures(Fisherianincome)

Whilestandardconceptsofincomeareusefultoolsformeasuringcurrentproduction,itisdifficulttoextractanywelfaresignificancefromthem.Theshortcomingofthetraditionalapproachisclearwhenweconsider

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > IT计算机 > 电脑基础知识

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2