GMATAA高分作文模板Word文档下载推荐.docx
《GMATAA高分作文模板Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《GMATAA高分作文模板Word文档下载推荐.docx(9页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。
carefulexaminationwouldreviewhow
groundlessthisconclusionis.
(经典)结尾段模板Toconclude,this
argumentisnotpersuasiveasitstands.
Accordingly,itisimprudentfortheauthorto
claimthat….Tomakethisargumentlogically
acceptable,theauthorwouldhavetoshow
that….Inaddition,tosolidifytheconclusion,
theauthorshouldprovideconcreteevidenceas
welltodemonstratethat….Onlywithmore
convincingevidencecouldthisargument
becomemorethanjustanemotionalappeal.
(结尾中复述的理由就copy/paste开头中的理由).
高频理由(按频率由高到低排列)
时序性因果攻击Firstly,theauthorisengaged
in‘afterthis,therefore,becauseofthis'
reasoning.Thelineofreasoningisthat
becauseAhappenedbeforeB,theformer
causedthelatter.However,thisreasoningis
fallaciousunlessotherpossiblecausalfactors
havebeenconsideredandruledout.For
example,perhapsC.Asaresult,anydecision
aimedataddressingtheproblemofBmustbe
basedonamorethoroughinvestigationto
gatherdatainordertonarrowdownandlocate
theactualcauseofB.
同时性因果攻击Secondly,theauthor'
s
solutionrestsontheassumptionthatAisthe
causeofBjustbecauseAcoincidedwithB.
However,amerepositionalcorrelationdoes
notnecessarilyproveacausalrelationship.In
B,
ofcausesprospectiveotheralladdition,
suchasCandD,mustberuledout.Without
detailedanalysisoftherealsourceofB,it
wouldbegroundlesstoattributeBtoA.
错误类比攻击Additionally,itishighly
doubtfulthatstrategiesdrawnfromAare
applicabletoB.However,differencesbetween
thesetwoclearlyoutweighthesimilarities,
thereforemakingtheanalogymuchlessvalid.
Forexample,CandDallaffectAbutvirtually
absentinB.Accordingly,wecanseethatA
andBaresodissimilarthatBisunlikelyto
experiencethesameconsequenceifitadopts
A'
sstrategies.
非此即彼攻击Lastbutnotleast,theauthor
unfairlyassumesthatareadermustmakea
either-orchoice.However,theargumentfails
toruleoutpossibilitythatadjustingAandB
mightproducebetterresults.Moreover,ifthe
authoriswrongintheassumptionthatAandB
aretheonlycausesoftheproblem,thusthe
mosteffectivesolutionmightincludea
complexofotherfactors—suchasCandD.In
anyevent,theauthorprovidesnojustification
forthemutuallyexclusivechoiceimposedon
thereader.
必要性攻击Inthefirstplace,theauthor
unfairlyassumesthatBwasdeterminedsolely
byA.WhileAisaseeminglyimportant
elementindeterminingB,itishardlytheonly
orevennecessarilyrequiredelement.This
assumptionoverlooksothercrucialcriteriain
determiningB—suchasC,D.Without
accountingforthesepotentialfactors,the
authorconcludestoohastilythat…isthebest
waytoachievegoals.
充分性攻击Inthesecondplace,theauthor'
solutionrestsontheassumptionthatAis
goals.
desiredthetobirthgivetosufficient
However,ifitturnsoutthatBisduetoa
combinationoffactors,someofwhichwill
remainunchangedinthefuture,suchasCand
D,onlyAmighthavenoimpactonB.
选择性样本攻击Athresholdproblemisthat
theauthorprovidesnoevidencetoclaimthat
thegeneralgroupasawholeisofthesame
characteristic.Theexamplecited,while
suggestiveofthistrend,isinsufficientto
warrantthatthesampleisrepresentativeofthe
wholegroup.Forexample,Iquestion
that…Therefore,suchevidencewouldbe
obviouslyunrepresentative.Infact,infaceof
suchlimitedevidence,itisfallaciousforthe
authortodrawanyconclusionatall.
(与“选择性样本攻击”较类似)样本代表性攻击Moreover,apossiblemethodology
problemintheargumentisthatitisofbias.
be
tovaguetooismany'
‘sotermThe
statisticallymeaningful.Itisverypossiblethat
workerswhoweremoreinterestedinthe
surveymightbelikelytorespondtothe
questionnaire.Lackingintheinformation
aboutthenumberofworkerssurveyedandthe
numberofrespondents,itisimpossibleto
assessthevalidityofthesurvey.Forinstance,
if1000workersweresurveyedbutonly10
responded,theresultshouldbehighlysuspect.
Becausetheauthorfailstoaccountforother
interpretations,thesurveywouldbeuselessin
concludingthat….
其他理由
忽略他因攻击Thirdly,theauthorhasfocused
onlyonA.Amoredetailedanalysiswould
revealthatotherfactorsfaroutweighthefactor
onwhichtheauthorfocuses.Forexample,C.
Lackingamorecomprehensiveanalysisofthe
causes,itispresumptuousfortheauthorto
claimthatAsolelydeterminedB.
因果倒置攻击Atlast,itispossiblethatthe
authorhasconfusedcausewitheffect.Perhaps
AwasaresponsetoB.Sincetheauthorfailsto
accountforthispossibility,theclaimthat…is
completelyunwarranted.
样本数量攻击Anotherproblemthat
seriouslyweakensthelogicofthisargumentis
thatthesurveycitedisbasedontoosmalla
sampletobereliable.Offeredinsupportofthe
argument,theonlyevidenceisthat….Unless
itcanbeshownthatthesampleistypicalofall
generalgroup,thefactthat…isgroundlessto
claimthat…
Loadedquestion和诚实性攻击What'
more,themethodologyofthesurveyis
problematicfortworeasons.Foronething,we
arenotinformedwhetherthesurveyprovided
only3alternatives.Ifitdid,therespondents,
whomightverywellpreferanotherchoicenot
providedinthesurvey,mightbeforcedtogive
uptheirpreferences.Foranotherthing,weare
notinformedwhetherthesurveyresponses
wereanonymousorconfidential.The
respondentsmightsupplyresponsesfavored
bytheirsuperiorswhomightconductthe
survey.Botheventswouldleadthissurvey
unreliable,letalonedrawtheconclusion
that…
样本时效性攻击Lastbutnotleast,another
flawthatsignificantlyunderminesthis
argumentisthattheauthorneglectstoindicate
howrecentlythesurveywasactually
conducted.Whenusedtogenerallyclaima
particulargroup,thesamplesshouldbeclose
enoughtosupportthegeneralization,inorder
topreventhistoricalchangesfrominvalidating
thegeneralization.Allweknowisthatthe
surveyisrecentlypublished.Thelessrecent
thesurveyitself,thelessreliabletheresultsto
demonstratethat…
差异概念攻击Tobeginwith,wemust
establishthemeaningofthevagueconceptA.
IfthetermweresynonymouswithB,the
evidencecitedwouldstronglysupportthe
argument.However,Amaybedefinedinother
termssuchasCandD.Accordingly,theauthor
hasdrawntheconclusiontoohastilyduetothe
ignoranceofotherdefinitionsofA.
范围内推攻击What'
smore,themost
egregiousreasoningerrorinthisargumentis
thattheauthorusesevidencepertainingtoa
generalgrouponthebasisofaparticularB.
Evenifthereasoningmaybesoundingeneral
sense,theparticularsituationinwhichBis
the
ofrepresentativebenotmayinvolved
entiregeneralgroup.Itispossiblethat...Ifthis
isthecase,theclaimthat…isillfounded.
不随时变攻击Moreover,theauthorunfairly
assumesthatAwillremainunchangedoverthe
nextdecades.However,amererecent
one-yearAisinsufficienttoclaimthat.
Statisticsfromsuchlimitedanecdotalevidence
isnotagoodindicatorforthistrend.In
addition,itispossiblethatinthefuture,this
trendwouldgreatlyfluctuateorevenreverse,
thentheadoptionoftheauthor'
sproposal
mightgivebirthtoB,however,itmightalso
haveanegativeimpactonC1and,inturns,C2.
Admittedly,thisargumentwouldbeeven
weakerandweakereachdayastimegoesby