外刊第1期.docx

上传人:b****6 文档编号:13108888 上传时间:2023-06-11 格式:DOCX 页数:26 大小:827.69KB
下载 相关 举报
外刊第1期.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第6页
第6页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第7页
第7页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第8页
第8页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第9页
第9页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第10页
第10页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第11页
第11页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第12页
第12页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第13页
第13页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第14页
第14页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第15页
第15页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第16页
第16页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第17页
第17页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第18页
第18页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第19页
第19页 / 共26页
外刊第1期.docx_第20页
第20页 / 共26页
亲,该文档总共26页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
下载资源
资源描述

外刊第1期.docx

《外刊第1期.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外刊第1期.docx(26页珍藏版)》请在冰点文库上搜索。

外刊第1期.docx

外刊第1期

2016年外刊第2期

Passage1:

BoJobreaksranks

BorisJohnsoniswrong:

inthe21stcentury,sovereigntyisalwaysrelative

Feb21st2016,15:

54 BYBAGEHOT

TODAYthecommentariat,andalmostnooneelse,hasbeenwaitingexcitedlyforBorisJohnsontoshowhiscoloursinBritain’supcomingEUreferendum.Thegreatmomentcameat3:

30pmwiththeBBC’sconfirmationofpriorreportsthatLondon’smayorwouldbackaBrexitvote.ThisnewsisbadfortheIncampaign—heisthecountry’smostpopularpolitician,afterall—thoughnotnearlyasmuchassomeexcitedEuroscepticswillclaiminthecominghours.ItpositionsMrJohnsontorunfortheConservativeleadershipshouldDavidCameronlosethereferendum,andperhaps,thoughnotasimmediately,ifhedoesnot.Butshamelesslyself-interestedandprobablycontrarytohisrealviewsontheEUthoughitis,themayor’smoveisperhapsnotentirelydisingenuous.HehasalwaysinsistedthathisdecisionwouldturnonhisconcernsthatEUmembershipisincompatiblewithBritishsovereignty.Expecthimtoconcentrateonthisobjectioninthecomingdays.

MrJohnsonhasthusalignedhimselfsquarelywithMichaelGove,thejusticesecretarywithwhomheconsortedearlierintheweekandwhodeclaredhissupportforBrexitonFridayina1,500-wordstatementthatoverwhelminglyconcentratedonnationalself-rule.The"decisionswhichgovernallourlives",MrGoveargued,shouldbetakenuniquelyby"peoplewechooseandwhowecanthrowoutifwewantchange".ItisworthtakingthisvarietyofEuroscepticismseriously—partlybecauseitcomesfromthemorethoughtful,liberalwingofthemovement(MrGoveisnottheLittleEnglanderofEurophilelore,forexample).ButalsobecauseitwillfeatureveryprominentlyinthedebatesbetweennowandJune23rd,especiallyasMrJohnsonwillnowpresumablybecomethefaceoftheOutcampaign.

TheJohnson-Goveargumentgoessomethinglikethis:

unlikemanycontinentalcountries,Britainhasanunbrokentraditionoflibertyandrepresentativedemocracy(a"goldenthread")datingbacktoMagnaCartaandsharedbyotherAnglophonenations.Thistraditionisalmostuniquelyuncompromisingaboutaccountability,steadfastintheconvictionthatpowershouldrestonlyinthehandsofleaderselectedbyandanswerabletoanationconstitutingademos,acommunityofsharedassumptionsandexperiences.ThustheEU,accountabletoforeignersaswellasBritons,breaksthesacredbondofmutualpowerbetweendecisionmakersandthoseonwhosebehalftheyact.

Theflawinthiscaseliesinthetradition'sidealisticdefinitionofsovereignty.ForMrJohnsonandMrGove,beingsovereignislikebeingpregnant—youeitherareoryouaren’t.Yetincreasinglyintoday’spost-Westphalianworld,realsovereigntyisrelative.Acountrythatrefusesoutrighttopoolauthorityisonethathasnocontroloverthepollutiondriftingoveritsborders,thestandardsoffinancialregulationaffectingitseconomy,theconsumerandtradenormstowhichitsexportersandimportersarebound,thecleanlinessofitsseasandthesecurityandeconomiccrisespropellingshockwaves—migration,terrorism,marketvolatility—deepintodomesticlife.Tolivewithglobalisationistoacknowledgethatmanylaws(boththosedevisedbygovernmentsandthosewhichbubbleupatnoone’sbehest)areinternationalbeastswhetherwelikeitornot.Ifsovereigntyistheabsenceofmutualinterference,themostsovereigncountryintheworldisNorthKorea.

ThustheEUisjustoneofthousandsofintrusionsonthesortofsovereigntythatthelikesofMrJohnsonsocherish.Britainissubjecttosome700internationaltreatiesinvolvingmulti-lateralsubmissionstomultilateralcompromises.ItsmembershipoftheUNsimilarlyinfringesitsself-determination,foritcanbeoutvotedtherejustasitcaninBrussels.LikewisetheWTO,NATO,theCOPclimatetalks,theIMF,theWorldBank,nucleartestbantreatiesandaccordsonenergy,water,maritimelawandairtrafficallrequireBritaintotoleratethesortoftrade-offsthatEurosceptic souverainistes finddistasteful:

influenceinexchangeforirksomestandardisation,lawsandrulessetmostlybyforeignersnotelectedbyBritons(regulationsthatBritainwouldnotapply,orwouldapplydifferently,iflefttoitsowndevices).Yetitsubmitstoalloftheseknowingthat,aswiththeEU,itisfreetoleavewheneveritwants—butatapricenotworthpaying.

ThisispreciselywhythetwomodelsforaBritainoutsidetheEU oftencitedbyEurosceptics(includingMrJohnson),NorwayandSwitzerland,constitutesuchweakargumentsforBrexit.UndertheJohnson-Goveview,thesecountriesarequitedramaticallymore"sovereign"thanBritain.Butinpracticetheireconomiesandsocietiesaresointertwinedwiththoseoftheirneighboursthattheymustsubjectthemselvestorulesoverwhichtheyhavenosay.Thisexposesafalsechoice:

inanincreasinglyinterdependentworld,countriesmustoftenoptnotbetweenpuresovereigntyandthepooledsort,but—howeverdistastefulthechoicemayseem—betweenthepooledsortandnone.

Perhapstheveryreasonwhythisseemsdistastefulneedsrevising.Thepremiseputforthbythe souverainistes isthatBritain,unliketheEUasawhole,isacoherent demos:

adiscretecivicunitwithadistinctsenseofrightandwrong,asharedcorpusofcivilassumptionsandmostofallacommondialecticalrealm(asBenedictAndersonnoted,theriseofnationalisminthe19thcenturywasassociatedwithemergenceofamassmedia,makingthe"imaginedcommunity"ofnationhoodpossible).InotherwordstheBritishelectoratecan,initscollectivewisdom,reachjudgmentsaboutpoliticiansandpoliciesinawayimpossibleamongtheEUpopulationasawhole,withits24languages,28nationalmedialandscapes,multiplelegalsystemsandvastrangeofhistoricalandideologicalhinterlands.Hence,notwithoutreason,theEuroscepticoffencetakenatcomparisonsofthedemocraticlegitimacyconferredbyEuropeanParliamenttothatconferredbynationalparliaments.

Muchofthisholdstrue.Buttowhatextent?

Themediaisfragmentingandinternationalising.Thecitizensofagivencountrydonotallwatchthesametelevisionprogrammesandreadthesamenewspapersanymore.AcrossEuropethereisevidenceofgrowingpoliticalpolarisationalongculturallines:

foralltheirdifferencesinexperienceandoutlook,votersindeclining,post-industrialpartsofEnglandandFrancehavemuchmoreincommonwitheachotherthanwiththoseincosmopolitanLondonorParis.Languagedividespeoplelessallthetime.Sub-nationalallegiancesaregrowinginstrength(noteScotland’sslidetowardsindependence)andformanincreasinglyappropriateandeffectivebasisforgovernment(consideralltherecentliteratureonthe"ageofmayors").Sowhileonecanstillarguethatpowerexercisedatanationallevelismoredemocraticallyvalidthanthatexercisedatasupra-nationalone,thatcasebecomeslesspressingwitheachpassingyear.

Afinalobservation.TalkofforeignersimposingtheirwillonBritain’selectedgovernmentisusually(andespeciallyinMrJohnson’scase)accompaniedbyapatrioticflourish:

theassertionthat,asoneofworld’sgreateconomic,culturalandmilitarypowers,thecountrydeservestogetitsautonomybackandcanmakeitonitsown.Butthischest-puffingdivergesfromtheunderlyingsovereigntyargument,whichonlyworksif,deepdown,youthinkBritainabitpuny.Considerthetrade-off:

letforeignershavesomeinfluenceoveryourcountryof64mandinreturnreceivequitealotofinfluenceoveraunionofmorethan500m.WhenEuroscepticsonlymentionthefirsthalfofthisbargain,theyimplythatBritainistooweedytotakeadvantageofthesecond. Whichisodd,asthenationalstrengthstheyotherwisecelebrategivethecountryatremendousabilitytodoso.Itsdiplomaticservice,itsglobalalliances,itslanguage,itshistoricalheft—nottomentiontheabsenceofapowersimilarlywellpositionedtoexercisecontinentalleadership—allputitinafantasticpositiontosettheagendainBrusselsatthoseraremoments(forexample,atthetimeoftheLisbonAgendaandtheunion’seastwardsexpansion)whenitputsitsmindtothetask.TheEUisBritain’storun,ifonlyitcouldovercomeitsinsecurityaboutscaryforeignbullies.Inaninterconnectedandineluctablyintegrated21stcentury,itisthat,farmorethantheEurosceptics’puritygames,thatisrealsovereignty. 

Passage2:

Fightingthenextrecession

Unfamiliarwaysforward

Policymakersinricheconomiesneedtoconsidersomeradicalapproachestotacklingthenextdownturn

Feb20th2016 | Fromtheprintedition

ATTHEstartofmostyearsinthepastdecade,thelistofworriesabouttheworldeconomyhasseemedlongerthanthatofreasonsforhope.Thefirstfewweeksof2016haveupheldthisnewtradition.Manyemergingmarketsarewrestlingwithexcessivedebts,slowgrowth,plungingcurrenciesandrisinginflation.China,theworld’ssecond-largesteconomy,isasourceofapeculiarlyintractableanxiety.Ifitsgrowthfalters,itstokesworriesabouttheprospectsforotheremergingmarkets;ifactivityholdsup,though,concernsshifttotheever-risingdebtthatmakessuchfeatspossible,butnotnecessarilysustainable.Theeuroarea’stroublesarenolongeracute;butachronicconditionwithanuncertainprognosisisahardthingfromwhichtotakemuchcheer.

TheonebighopehastendedtobetheAmericaneconomy.Someindicatorsthereremainrobust.Thehousingmarketshowsfewsignsofweakness.Newjobsarestillbeingadded.Butdespitethis,signsofimpendingrecessionarenowpilingup.Economicgrowthseemstohavestalledinthefinalquarterof2015.Corpor

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 经管营销 > 经济市场

copyright@ 2008-2023 冰点文库 网站版权所有

经营许可证编号:鄂ICP备19020893号-2